• Title/Summary/Keyword: 회전 케비테이션

Search Result 2, Processing Time 0.017 seconds

Measurement Uncertainty Analysis for Fluctuating Hull Pressure (선미변동압력 계측시험에서의 불확실성 해석)

  • G.I. Choi
    • Journal of the Society of Naval Architects of Korea
    • /
    • v.30 no.4
    • /
    • pp.46-60
    • /
    • 1993
  • Accurate measurements of fluctuating pressure in the cavitation tunnel are necessary to predict vibration and noise intensities in full scale ship. In this paper, the results of an experimental study on fluctuating pressure induced by a cavitating propeller are presented and discussed. Extensive measurements at several propeller revolutions are made using the flat plate to understand controversial problems of the effects of propeller revolution in the cavitation tunnel. The analysis of the uncertainties in experimental measurements and results is used to estimate the errors in uniform flow.

  • PDF

Experimental Study on the Unsteady Cavitation of Turbopump Inducer (터보펌프 인듀서의 비정상 캐비테이션에 관한 실험적 연구)

  • Hong, Soon-Sam;Kim, Jin-Sun;Choi, Chang-Ho;Kim, Jin-Han
    • 유체기계공업학회:학술대회논문집
    • /
    • 2003.12a
    • /
    • pp.333-339
    • /
    • 2003
  • Steady and unsteady cavitation characteristics of turbopump inducer were investigated in this paper. To see the effect of blade angle on the inducer performance, three inducers with inlet tip blade angle of $7.8^{\circ},\;7.0^{\circ},\;6.1^{\circ}$, respectively, were tested. For $7.8^{\circ},\;7.0^{\circ}$ inducers in the non-cavitating condition, head decreased linearly with flow rate, but head-flow rate curve had a dip at the flow coefficient ${\Phi}=0.065\;for\;6.1^{\circ}$ inducer. Rotating cavitation and cavitation surge were found in the $7.8^{\circ},\;7.0^{\circ}$ inducers in the cavitation tests. During the rotating cavitation one cell rotated at the same rotational speed as that of the inducer. The cavitation surge did not rotate and the oscillating frequency was $7{\sim}20\;Hz$. From the curve of the critical cavitation number versus flow rate, it was found that the steady cavitation performance of $6.1^{\circ}$ inducer was much lower than that of $7.8^{\circ},\;7.0^{\circ}$ inducers.

  • PDF