• Proceedings of the Korean Institute of Navigation and Port Research Conference
• /
• 2010.10a
• /
• pp.161-163
• /
• 2010

말하기는 곧 행위라는 주장이 화용론의 핵심명제이다. VTS 대화는 선박들의 효율적이고 안전한 항해를 위해 이루어지는 언어적 상호작용 행위이다. 본 연구에서는 모든 VTS 화행은 항해행위의 수행에 따른 부수적인 요소가 아니라 필수불가결한 요소라는 점에 주목하고자 하였다. 먼저 화용론에서 다루는 대화의 협력원칙, 공손원칙, 명령화행 및 약속화행의 적정성, 최소대화의 원칙을 VTS 대화 상황에 적용하여 VTS 화행의 특성을 정립하고자 하였다. 그리고 실제 발생했던 해양사고에서 선박 간 담화 또는 대화를 분석함으로써 화용론적 실패가 충돌사고에 어떻게 영향을 끼치는지를 검토해보았다. VTS 상황에서 이루어지는 담화 또는 대화분석을 통해 해양사고의 원인을 심도 있게 분석하는 방안과 이의 결과를 항해사 및 관제사 교육에 활용하는 방안을 제시하였다. 덧붙여서 co-Navigation 개념이 항해안전의 새로운 패러다임이 되어야 한다는 것을 주장하였다.

• Journal of English Language & Literature
• /
• v.55 no.1
• /
• pp.199-213
• /
• 2009

From the perspective of pragmatics, language is a mode of act that works in the order of motive and performs human purpose. The function of language is then primarily performative rather than informational or significative. Pragmatics, however, encounters a tough question: what is the relation of the linguistic act to meaning? Many language theories including pragmatic theories admit the autonomy of meaning while defining language as act. But in Deleuze and Peirce we find examples of maximalist pragmatics that denies the autonomy of meaning. However, Deleuze and Peirce are different in their view on the function of meaning. For Deleuze, language is the transmission of act, what he calls 'order-word.' He rejects meaning except as the minimal condition for the transmission. But his theory turns out to be contradictory in that meaning as the minimal condition is actually the function of constants that he denies for order-words that are always variables. On the contrary, Peirce's pragmatism as a radical pragmatics does not exclude meaning. For him, language is interpretative act serving the purpose of understanding reality, which is performed through the function of meaning and 'habit.' This shows that meaning is indispensable to language even in maximalist pragmatics.

• Annual Conference on Human and Language Technology
• /
• 2023.10a
• /
• pp.95-100
• /
• 2023

끊임없이 재생산되는 혐오 표현의 정확한 탐지를 위해서는 혐오란 무엇인가에 대한 본질적인 이해가 필요하다. 본 연구에서는 화용론에서 사용되는 적정성 조건이라는 분석 틀을 활용하여 모델이 '혐오하기' 화행을 어떻게 인식하고 있는지 평가하고자 했다. 혐오 화행의 적정성 조건을 명제 내용 조건, 예비 조건, 성실성 조건, 본질 조건으로 나누어 분석하였으며, 이를 진위형, 연결형, 단답형, 논술형 문항으로 구성했다. 그 결과 모든 문항 유형에서 50점이 넘는 점수를 받았으나 비교적 고차원인 사고 능력을 측정하는 단답형과 논술형 문항 유형의 점수가 가장 낮게 나타났다.

• Proceedings of the Korean Information Science Society Conference
• /
• 2004.04b
• /
• pp.544-546
• /
• 2004

최근 자연언어를 이용하여 정보를 제공하거나 업무를 수행하는 대화 에이전트가 활발히 연구되고 있다. 보다 다양한 사용자 질의를 분석하고 적절한 답변을 제공하기 위해서는 대규모의 답변 데이터베이스를 구축하여야 한다. 기존 답변 데이터베이스의 구축은 설계자가 수동으로 입력질의의 패턴을 분석하고 이에 대한 답변을 작성하여 패턴-답변쌍을 제작하여 이루어졌다. 따라서 패턴의 분석이 설계자에 의존적이어서 일반적이지 못하며 중복되거나 쓸모없는 패턴-답변쌍이 생성되기도 한다. 또한 초기에 구축된 답변 데이터베이스에 의해 성능이 제한되어 답변 성능의 향상을 위해서는 답변 데이터베이스를 수동으로 추가해야한다. 본 논문에서는 대화를 통해 필요한 정보론 수집하여 자동으로 괘턴-답변쌍을 생성하는 방법을 제안하다. 사용자 입력문장을 화행별로 구분하고 각 화행별 답변 템플릿을 이용하여 패턴-답변쌍을 완성한다. 기존의 수동제작 방식과 비교 실험을 통해 제안하는 방법이 지식구조 구축 속도나 사용자 평가 면에서 훨씬 우수함을 확인하였다.

• KIPS Transactions on Software and Data Engineering
• /
• v.5 no.1
• /
• pp.29-34
• /
• 2016

One of the most important aspects of the research on multi-agent systems is the definition of agent communication languages(ACLs) and the specification of a proper formal semantics of ACLs. In this paper, we propose an illocutionary effect-based FIPA-ACL semantics which overcomes the two traditional semantic approaches. The key idea of this new semantics is based on the semantic concepts of success and satisfaction conditions of illocutionary acts in speech act theory, and the common ground theory-based framework. As case studies using this new semantics, we define the primitive speech acts of FIPA-ACL such as inform and request. For the strengths of the proposed approach we illustrate our new semantics on an e-commerce agent purchase negotiation. Also, we compare this approach with two traditional semantic approaches for ACLs.

• Journal of Korean language education
• /
• v.29 no.4
• /
• pp.225-254
• /
• 2018

The purpose of this study is to contrast the patterns of realization and understanding of refusal speech acts between Korean and Thai learners. This study intends to answer the following questions: (1) Do Koreans and Thai learners perform refusal speech acts differently? (2) Do Koreans and Thai learners understand refusal speech acts differently? A DCT and a follow-up interview were conducted to collect data of two groups of 30 native Korean speakers and 30 native Thai speakers. For research question 1, we analyzed the refusal strategy and provided reasons given by Koreans and Thai learners depending on the context. For research question 2, we ran a chi-squared test on the elements of the follow-up interviews, such as the weight of burden of refusing, and whether the participant would actually refuse or not. The differences between the refusal strategies of the two groups could be categorized by the preceding inducing speech act. In refusing a request, the difference was prominent in the apologizing strategy, whereas in refusing a suggestion, the difference was mainly in the direct refusal strategy. When refusing an invitation, the most evident difference was the number of refusal strategies employed. When providing an explanation of refusal to people with high social status, Koreans gave more specific reasons for refusals, whereas Thai learners tended to use more vague reasons. Moreover, when refusing an invitation, Koreans primarily mentioned the relationship, and Thai learners showed the spirit of Greng Jai. When asked the weight of burden of refusing, Koreans felt pressured to refuse a request from people with high social status, and a suggestion or invitation from people with high level of intimacy while Thai learners found it highly difficult to make a refusal in all cases. In answering whether they would actually refuse or not, Koreans tried not to make a refusal to people with high level of intimacy, and such a trend was not evident among the Thai. This study can help us better understand the learner's pragmatic failure, and serve as a basis in establishing a curriculum for teaching speech acts.

• Cross-Cultural Studies
• /
• v.27
• /
• pp.435-470
• /
• 2012

This paper aims to examine directives and its adjacency pair directives-responses in the Chinese textbook Hanyu Kouyu from the speech act theory, and give some suggestions for Chinese speaking instruction. For analysis of directives, it is important to consider context surrounding it at first. Context includes space for speaking, person who speak with, adjacent speech act, etc., so this paper considers context firstly before explaining directives and discusses how each element of context effects interpretation of its meaning. From the politeness perspective, directives and rejection as one of the responses are easy to be FTAs(face-threatening acts) fundamentally, so they are required to have some strategies for minimizing the threat, and it is found that there are strategies for positive face and negative face in the textbook. In the textbook, it is also examined that directives-responses contribute for interlocutor to accomplish social acts, for example, negotiating, insisting, maintaining, making alternative ideas, etc.

• Journal of the Korean Geographical Society
• /
• v.45 no.6
• /
• pp.820-844
• /
• 2010

This study investigates the effect of GIS-integrated lessons on spatial thinking abilities and geographical skills using discourse analysis along with a comparative three-case case study method. A series of curricula were designed and implemented in an 8th grade classroom for a semester. The data collected consist of the dialogue transcripts of six consecutive GIS-integrated lessons. The transcripts were analyzed to identify the moves (speech acts) used by each student and to classify discourse content of spatial thinking and geographical skills. Based on three individual case studies, a cross-case study was performed to uncover any relationship between the phenomenon and the contexts. The empirical evidence from discourse analysis demonstrated that students were able to generate appropriate terms representative of spatial thinking and geographical skills although students appeared to possess primarily lower-order spatial abilities, followed by a moderate-level of spatial abilities. Considering that the unit was implemented in a biology class rather than a geography class the result reflected the fact that the student's spatial thinking and geographical skills were attributable to the GIS-integrated lessons. Thus, the results have a great implication for GIS-integrated lessons and geography education as an innovative tool for improving student's spatial thinking and geographical skills.

• Korean Journal of Cognitive Science
• /
• v.3 no.2
• /
• pp.161-174
• /
• 1992

The present discussion is concerned with showing the development of natural language processing and how it is related to information and cognition.On the basis of the computeational model,in which humans are viewed as processors of linguistic structures that use stored knowledge-grammar, lexicon and structures representing the encyclopedic information of the world,such programs of natural language understanding as Winograd's SHRDLU came out.However,such pragmatic factors as contexts and the speaker's beliefs,internts,goals and intentions are not easy to process yet.Language,ingormation and cognition are argued to be closely interrelated,and the study of them,the paper argues,can lead to the development of science on general.

• Annual Conference on Human and Language Technology
• /
• 1998.10c
• /
• pp.358-364
• /
• 1998

본 연구는 한국어 대화인지모형을 구축하는 데 필요한 화용론적 지식에 관한 연구의 일환으로, 부대화의 개시 및 종료 시점에서 나타나는 담화 참여자의 의도 및 그 의도와 관련된 표층표지를 분석하고, 나아가 필수 논항 성분의 하나로서 대화체에서는 자주 생략되어 나타나는 청화자 논항의 의미복원을 위한 예비적 단계로서 술어의 어미 특성 및 화자의 언어행위 혹은 화행과 관련하여 청자 논항의 생략 유형을 분류하고 분석했다. 이러한 연구는 한국어 대화 에이전트를 개발하는데 있어 필수적인 단계로서 향후 대화체 이해시스템 연구에 기초적인 틀을 제공해 줄 수 있다.