• Proceedings of the Korean Institute of Information and Commucation Sciences Conference
• /
• 2016.05a
• /
• pp.208-209
• /
• 2016

This study explores how bargaining power and partnership effect on the SCM main results namely flexibility, agility, and control of uncertainty. To test the suggested model, this study used a data set generated from online and offline survey. The 140 sets of data collected, which companies use SCM, were tested against the model using SPSS 23 and smartPLS 3.2.3. The results of this study are as follows. First, Bargaining power had an effect on partnership. Second, partnership had an effect on the SCM agility, flexibility, control of uncertainty.

• The Journal of the Korea institute of electronic communication sciences
• /
• v.8 no.10
• /
• pp.1553-1560
• /
• 2013

This study focused on the residential real estate market, real estate for sale in the course of the bargaining power of buyers in terms of factors to be extracted was determined. In addition to rental housing, including the number of buyers have several alternatives, the more related information, the buyers have advantage over the sellers in the course of the housing sale process. And if the external conditions and the situations between the parties have changed, how much flexibility to respond to changing and the less costs of to changing, the buyers have advantage over the sellers in the course of the housing sale process.

• Proceedings of the Korean Institute of Navigation and Port Research Conference
• /
• 2016.05a
• /
• pp.228-229
• /
• 2016

Bargaining power or negotiation power departing from negotiators' economical beneficial point of view has long been an important research subject in a number of industries, and it has been widely studied by focusing on the various kinds of game theory. Although existing papers are mainly based on the strategies and results of bargaining process, ${\cdots}$(중략)${\cdots}$.

• Proceedings of the Korean DIstribution Association Conference
• /
• 2005.05a
• /
• pp.151-161
• /
• 2005

본 연구는 인터넷 전자상거래를 이용하는 소비자를 대상으로 인터넷 공동구매의 동기요인(시장불확실성, 가격의식, 집단주의, 혁신주의)이 협상력과 관여도에 따른 공동구매에 대한 태도와 공동구매의 의도에 미치는 영향에 대해서 실증 분석하였다. 시장불확실성, 가격의식, 집단주의, 혁신주의는 인터넷 공동구매태도의 선행변수로 가정하였으며 협상력, 관여도는 공동구매태도의 조절변수로 가정하였다. 그리고 공동구매태도는 인터넷 공동구매의도에 직접적인 영향을 미치는 것으로 가정하였다. 실증분석은 인터넷상에서 제품을 한번이라도 구매해 본 경험이 있거나 인터넷 공동구매를 한번이라도 해 본 경험이 있는 고객을 대상으로 설문조사 하였다. 조사분석 결과, 공동구매 동기요인인 시장불확실성, 가격의식, 집단주의, 혁신주의가 높을수록 공동구매태도에 정(+)의 유의한 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났으며 협상력이 높을 때보다는 낮을 때 공동구매태도에 부(-)의 유의한 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났으며 관여도는 낮을 때보다는 높을 때 공동구매태도에 정(+)의 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 또한 공동구매태도는 공동구매의도에 정(+)의 매우 유의한 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 결과적으로 인터넷을 통한 공동구매 시 동기요인인 시장불확실성, 가격의식, 집단주의, 혁신주의는 협상력이 낮을 때와 관여도가 높을 때 공동구매태도에 더 긍정적인 영향을 미치며 이러한 공동구매태도는 공동구매의도에 정(+)의 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다.

• Agrochemical news magazine
• /
• v.21 no.1 s.154
• /
• pp.18-21
• /
• 2000

• Health Policy and Management
• /
• v.12 no.4
• /
• pp.91-113
• /
• 2002

We report and analyze the Korean physicians' recent general strike over the implementation of the Separation of Prescribing and Dispensing Practice (SPDP) in which more than 18,000 private clinics and 280 hospitals participated. Utilizing game-theoretic models of bargaining we explain why the Korean physicians were so successful in organizing intense collective action against the government and securing very favorable policy outcomes. In particular, we highlight the role of distributional conflict among social actors in shaping the details of institutional reform. The introduction of the SPDP was a necessary first step in the overall reform of health care system in Korea. However, the SPDP was perceived to be a serious threat to the economic viability of their profession by the vast majority of Korean physicians who had long been relied on the profits from selling medicines to compensate for the loss of income due to the low service fee under the previous health care system. The strong political coalition among heterogeneous physicians enabled them to organize an intense form of collective action, the general strike. Thus, physicians were successful not only in dragging the government to a bargaining table, but also winning in the bargaining and securing an outcome vastly favorable to them. On the other hand, the lack of an overall reform plan in the health care policy area, especially the finance of the National Health Insurance and the need for maintaining an image as a successful reform initiator, motivated the government to reach a quick resolution with the striking physicians.

• International Area Studies Review
• /
• v.13 no.1
• /
• pp.417-444
• /
• 2009

In October 2005, the Russian government started an investigation if safeguard measures against the importation of Korean sodium cyanide products could be taken. With Russia being a non-WTO member country, the Korean side found themselves in different situation from previous negotiation cases with developed or WTO member countries. Although several elements of trade negotiation theories such as goal setting, bargaining power, and relationship could apply, new constraints of limited information access and uncertainty of administrative procedures should be overcome. Combination of the governmental negotiation, assistance of the Russian consumer group, and the application of related laws led the Russian authority to dismiss the case. I suggest that there be some built-in channels for gathering information of non-WTO member countries.

• Proceedings of the Korea Association of Information Systems Conference
• /
• 2000.11a
• /
• pp.16-30
• /
• 2000

• Korean Architects
• /
• s.625
• /
• pp.9-9
• /
• 2021

• Korean journal of communication and information
• /
• v.46
• /
• pp.212-244
• /
• 2009

This study examined the effects of cultural factors and demographic factors on the perceived appropriateness and likelihood of using five categories of inappropriate negotiation strategies. Five categories of inappropriate negotiation strategies consist of traditional competitive bargaining, attacking opponent's network, false promises, misrepresentation of information and inappropriate information gathering. Two kinds of cultural variables, Hofstede's cultural dimensions and 'Chemyon' dimensions were used as universal, etic variables versus indigenous, emic variables. Survey result shows age and gender had significant effects only for traditional competitive bargaining, but gender and personal negotiation style did not have any effects for the inappropriate strategies. Hofstede's dimensions as well as Chemyon dimensions had significant effect for perceived inappropriateness and likelihood of using inappropriate strategies. While both Chemyon and Hofstede's dimensions were significant, Chemyon accounted for more variance than Hofstede dimensions in most cases. This suggests Chemyon's vital role in explaining Korean negotiators' perception and attitude towards inappropriate negotiation strategies. Implications of the results and future research are discussed.