• Title/Summary/Keyword: 헤도니아

Search Result 3, Processing Time 0.018 seconds

Job Satisfaction of Social Workers from the Dimensions of Hedonia & Eudaimonia (헤도니아와 유데모니아 차원에서 분석한 사회복지사의 직무만족)

  • Song, In Han;Lee, Kyeongwon;Kim, Eunsil
    • Korean Journal of Social Welfare Studies
    • /
    • v.49 no.4
    • /
    • pp.131-157
    • /
    • 2018
  • The happiness of social worker's role in promoting the happiness of the people has been relatively overlooked. Despite the importance of the ultimate value and meaning of eudaimonic happiness felt by social workers as a value-oriented profession, negative aspects such as work-related burn-out or hedonic happiness such as pleasure has been mainly focused so far. Happiness is a concept that must be met with both hedonia and eudaimonia, and it is necessary to understand both two dimensions of job satisfaction experienced by social workers. The purpose of this study is to investigate 376 social worker's hedonic and eudaimonic job satisfaction and factors associated with them by analyzing "Social Worker's Eudaimonia" dataset in which the Korean Version of Global Hedonic & Eudaimonic Job Satisfaction(K-GHEJS) scale was used. The results showed that the factors affecting hedonia and eudaimonia were different so that hedonia was statistically significantly associated with the levels of education, income and workload while eudaimonia was not. Based on these results, how to improve the hedonic and eudaimonic job satisfaction among social workers was discussed.

Validation of the Korean Version of Global Hedonia-Eudaimonia Job Satisfaction Scale: A Study on Domestic Application of a Measurement for Happiness in the Social Welfare Profession (한국어판 전반적 헤도니아-유데모니아 직무만족(K-GHEJS) 척도 타당화 : 행복 척도 국내 적용을 위한 사회복지직 대상 연구)

  • Song, In Han;Lee, Kyeongwon;Kim, Eunsil
    • Korean Journal of Social Welfare Studies
    • /
    • v.49 no.1
    • /
    • pp.191-219
    • /
    • 2018
  • Although several measurements of happiness at work have been developed as interest in it has grown, most of them only deal with hedonia, emotional pleasure, and there exists no measurement of eudaimonia, ultimate happiness through meaning and worthiness in Korea. This study aims to examine the validity of the Korean version of Global Hedonic and Eudaimonic Job Satisfaction (K-GHEJS) scale which covers both hedonia and eudaimonia at work. Considering the job characteristics of social work which emphasizes the values and meaning of the helping profession, online survey was performed among a total of 376 social workers. Exploratory factor analysis confirmed the goodness-of-fit of 10 items, and confirmatory factor analysis confirmed that classification as two factors of hedonic and eudaimonic job satisfaction is appropriate. The reliability was found to be high as reliability coefficient Chronbach's ${\alpha}$ was .936. This K-GHEJS scale which measures eudaimonic happiness for the first time in Korea, is expected to be useful for measuring job satisfaction of the helping professions such as social work that pursues the values and meanings of work.

To whom is social value coaching useful? The effects of social value coaching on meaning of work, job satisfaction, and job crafting: The moderating role of regulatory focus (사회적 가치 코칭은 누구에게 유익한가? 사회적 가치 코칭이 일의 의미와 직무만족, 잡크래프팅에 미치는 영향: 조절초점의 조절효과)

  • Lee, Suran;Cho, Jeesun;Chung, Eun Kyoung
    • The Korean Journal of Coaching Psychology
    • /
    • v.5 no.2
    • /
    • pp.83-100
    • /
    • 2021
  • The purpose of this study was to investigate the positive impact that social value coaching has on employees, specifically highlighting the role of regulatory focus. Based on a coaching model, we developed a social value coaching program and applied it to the employees. We investigated whether the experimental group that participated in the social value coaching program would report higher levels of meaning of work, hedonic job satisfaction, eudaimonic job satisfaction, and job crafting compared to the control group, as well as whether regulatory focus would function as a moderator. We only analyzed the moderating role of prevention focus as promotion focus did not show any moderating effects. The results suggest that the experimental group that participated in the social value coaching program reported significant increases in all of the outcome variables compared to the control group. Additionally, for meaning of work, hedonic job satisfaction, and eudaimonic job satisfaction, the effects of the coaching program was stronger for those with a higher level of prevention focus than those with a lower level of it. Based on these results, we discussed the implications and limitations of this research, as well as suggestions for future research.

  • PDF