• Korean Journal of Child Studies
• /
• v.27 no.1
• /
• pp.95-111
• /
• 2006

In this study of acculturation strategies and adjustment in Korean-Chinese and Chinese-Korean children, 273 Korean-Chinese and 207 Chinese-Korean were asked about levels of assimilation to the mainstream language and culture, ethnic identity, emotional attitude toward their schools, teachers' support, peers' support, and social distance from the mainstream. Results revealed that separation was the most preferred strategy followed by integration, assimilation, and marginalization for both subject groups. Children categorized by separation strategies reported highest scores in school adjustment variables and lowest scores in social distance. There were some differences between Korean-Chinese and Chinese-Korean children in cultural assimilation, ethnic identity, emotional attitude toward school, and teacher's support. These findings were explained by their immigration history and the uniqueness of each mainstream society.

• Korean Journal of Child Studies
• /
• v.28 no.1
• /
• pp.129-145
• /
• 2007

The short form of the Early Adolescent Temperament Questionnaire-Revised(Ellis & Rothbart, 1999) was translated into Korean for Korean(N=367) and Korean-Chinese(N=258) children and into Chinese for Chinese-Korean(N=232) and Chinese(N=211) children. This 43 item scale of self-ratings was administered to 4th graders by home-room teachers in China and in Korea. Korean-Chinese children rated themselves higher on affiliation, depression, fear, pleasure- and perceptual - sensitivity and shyness than other groups. Chinese-Korean children were higher on affiliation, aggression and frustration, Chinese children were higher on activation control and Korean children rated themselves lowest on all subscales. Korean girls were higher than boys on activation control and affiliation. Korean boys were higher than girls on pleasure sensitivity. Chinese boys were higher than girls on aggression.

• Korean Journal of Child Studies
• /
• v.27 no.2
• /
• pp.181-194
• /
• 2006

The influence of peer relationships and teacher's support on the development of self-concept was assessed in Chinese immigrant, Korean-Chinese, and Korean middle and high school students. Subjects were 205 Chinese immigrants in Seoul, Korea, 256 Korean-Chinese in Shenyang, China, and 368 Korean adolescents in Seoul and Ulsan, Korea. Data were analyzed by ANOVA, factor analysis, and multiple regression. Results showed that the self-concept score of Korean-Chinese was highest followed by Chinese immigrants in Korea, and Korean adolescents, in that order. The self-concept of Chinese immigrant adolescents was influenced by peer relationships, of Korean-Chinese by teacher's support, of Korean adolescents by both peer relationships and teacher's support.

• Proceedings of the KHEEA Conference
• /
• 2002.08a
• /
• pp.5-19
• /
• 2002

재한국, 1995년제일차출대국가제정적가정과교육과정. 지후, 한국적가정과교육과정경마료7차적수정여개혁과정. 재차과정중, 가정과정불단지추극출신, 기과목명칭재변화, 필수자선 등 선과성질야재변화, 과치함축, 여기술과정합. 이차, 가정과변위남녀생공수적과목, 저취순응료사회발전적수요. 종한국적교육과정래간, 1년급도10년급시국민공용기본교육계단, 11년급도12년급시자선교육계단. 거차, 가정과교육과정적접배위여하 : 소학(5~6학년)위실과, 중학화고중(7~10학년)위"기술.가정", 고중(11~12학년)위"가전과학". 장종2003년개시실시적가정과과시안배위여하 : 소학각2과시, 7~12학년시각2.3.3.3과시, 11~12학년위6개등차. 최근, 청소년문제, 교육환경, 상시인성, 가정파양, 소비과잉, 학대아동, 등사회문제도근가정생활유착밀절적연계, 인차, 재반지교육중, 가정교육응수중시. 단시, 실제상병불시여차. 작위교육주체적교사화부모도몰유인식도저개실정. 인차, 가정학자여교사유심요주근지거연구가정교육. 우기시, 유필요근중국, 일본, 등저사아주국가호상교류화합작적과정중거탐색가정교육적안정발전. 하면파미래가정학육발전적방향건의여하 : 1) "가정" 과시이가정과위연구대상적가정학적독립적연구요영역. 가정경적연구감상시 "가정", 타이가정생활질량적제고위기연구목적. 인차, 재가정교육중, 과목적명칭명명위 "기술. 가정", "가정일반". "가사" 시부합리적. 이응위 "가정" 2) 가정교육웅사중시성각색적변환, 직업적인직변고적각도출발, 사소학도고중분개위필수화선수과, 유남녀생공수. 3) 가정과과시재축점축단. 도시유우교육과정적축단이인기적피면불료적현상. 단시고 여가정과시실천, 실험성과목응보장기최저적과시, 최기마필수유지현재적과시. 4) 향래, 한국적가정교육과정기이가정과위기본철학배경화리념, 우급시파국가교육과정적배경화이념, 가정학적발전동태반영재교육과정중, 즉강조즘요교. 단시, 경력료반복적변혁지후, 최근, 각중시즘양거배양학생적십 요 양적능력여가치. 인차, 가정교육파교육목라방재즘루거제고가정생활적질량, 즘루거호조화가정생활화직업생활, 즘양거개발합리지해결화실천가정생활적가치관. 5) 최근, 가정교육파교육방향화목라방재거배양학생작위독립적개인, 작위가족적성원, 작위사회성원래주인생도로적능력. 인차, 가정교육이인적생활위중심. 우거섭급학생재성장과정중소우도적문제,재거포괄재가정화사회생활중소우도적문제. 즉거배양해결가정생활중소우도적소유적 문종적종합능력. 6) 가정과재교학방법화교학평개상, 응채용실험, 실습, 관찰 등방식, 응반체험성, 실천성경험. 위차, 응필편기험적실험, 실습설비. 7) 확정교육과정편제적치후, 응제고일반교육학자적참여율, 가정교육학자응적극참여 제정교청정책적유관교육적각종위원회. 재제정정책적과정중각진소능, 적극제출건고성적의황. 8) 한, 중, 일 삼국권원층립가정교육과정도작사, 위삼국교육과정적량호발전주공헌.