• Korean Journal of Comparative Education
• /
• v.27 no.3
• /
• pp.75-100
• /
• 2017

The 2015 revised national curriculum has been implemented to first year students in elementary school, and will be expanded to middle school and high school from next year, 2018 school year. As of this year, the ways of implementing the curriculum and supporting teachers to better implement the curriculum into their classrooms are crucial. This study explores the implications for building curriculum supporting and implementing system by investigating relevant systems in foreign countries, such as Australia and England. In order to achieve the purpose, this study conducts literature review and previous studies in regards to the curriculum implementing and supporting system, interviews with curriculum developers and teachers, and analyzes their web-sites of the two countries. The results shows that active communication is essential among curriculum developers and curriculum implementers including school teachers and other stake-holders, and this communication can be achieved by building systematic ways; second, professional development for teachers should be recommended by supporting integrated and systematic teaching-learning process; third, the principal agent for curriculum implementation, school teachers, should have the autonomy for implementing the curriculum. The detailed ways for realizing the three implications are suggested.

• Ingenium
• /
• v.27 no.1
• /
• pp.25-29
• /
• 2020

• Ingenium
• /
• v.24 no.1
• /
• pp.17-21
• /
• 2017

• Proceedings of the Korea Society of Mathematical Education Conference
• /
• 2009.10a
• /
• pp.45-76
• /
• 2009

본 연구는 1992학년도부터 2008학년도까지의 수학과 중등교사 신규임용후보자 선정 경쟁시험(이하 중등교사 임용시험)과 2009학년도의 개정 시행된 시험(2008년 11월 9일), 그리고 이에 앞서 한국교육과정평가원에서 시행한 2009학년도 수학과 중등교사 임용시험 모의평가(2008년 6월 14일 시행)을 분석하고 평가문항의 내용별 분포와 적절성을 검토함으로써 수학과 중등교사 임용시험의 개선방안을 모색하기 위하여 다음과 같은 연구문제를 설정하고 이에 대한 분석을 하였다. 수학전공과목 임용시험 출제 평가문항의 내용영역별 분류는 어떠한가? 수학과 중등교사 임용시험 평가 문항들의 각 영역별 출제 빈도수는 어떠한가? 전국 사범대학교 수학교육과의 교육과정은 어떠한가? 임용시험 평가문항들이 사범대 수학교육과의 기본 이수과목을 포함한 교육과정을 적절하게 반영하고 있는가? 향후 중등교사 임용시험의 개선점에는 무엇이 있겠는가? 각 연구문제에 대한 분석결과에 대해 심층적으로 알아보고 중등교사 임용시험 평가문항들과 전국의 사범대학교 수학교육과의 기본 이수과목들에 대한 관련성에 대해 알아볼 것이다.

• Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education
• /
• v.27 no.4
• /
• pp.328-336
• /
• 2007

In this research we conducted a survey on the actual status of the 7th National Earth Science I & II curriculum to explore ways of revising the next Earth Science curriculum for better education. Of the 180 Earth Science teachers, 60% responded to the survey. The domains of the survey consist of (1) the necessity of Earth Science I & II curriculum revision, (2) educational goals, (3) content coverage, (4) level of difficulty and students' interest for Earth Science content, and (5) ways to overcome the crisis of Earth Science education. Majority of the respondents demanded the revision of Earth Science I, II curriculum because of overlapping and repetition of contents among 10th grade science and Earth Science I and overcrowded Earth Science II contents. Based on the survey results, recommendations on how to improve Earth Science I, II curriculum and how to adjust Earth Science contents are suggested. In addition to curriculum improvement, systematic supports are required for Earth science not to be excluded and turned down by the student and the scholastic aptitude test for university admission.

• Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education
• /
• v.44 no.1
• /
• pp.119-130
• /
• 2024

This study explores the possibility of using a generative artificial intelligence, ChatGPT, for student assessment in science subjects. In order to achieve our goal, we developed assessment items, collected students' responses, and input them into ChatGPT to implement the assessment procedures. Subsequently, we shared the assessment results from ChatGPT with science teachers and compared them to the teachers' assessment process to investigate the use of ChatGPT in student assessment. Regarding the results, in terms of setting the scoring rubric, we found the rubric generated by ChatGPT to be generally appropriate. However, the consistency between the scoring results obtained from ChatGPT and those determined by the teachers was relatively low. This inconsistency was more pronounced in items with additional assessment components and a more intricate rubric. In regard to feedback on student responses, there were some instances where the feedback generated was scientifically incorrect or beyond the scope of the curriculum, but there were also some positives, such as the provision of exemplary answers to questions and additional examples that helped students learn further. From these results, the teachers perceived limitations in using ChatGPT to conduct assessment in terms of reliability, which is considered crucial in student assessment, but suggested that it could be used to support assessment. Finally, synthesizing these findings, implications for utilizing ChatGPT in student assessment were suggested.

• Ingenium
• /
• v.26 no.3
• /
• pp.18-22
• /
• 2019

• Ingenium
• /
• v.27 no.2
• /
• pp.31-33
• /
• 2020

• Ingenium
• /
• v.25 no.4
• /
• pp.19-22
• /
• 2018

• Ingenium
• /
• v.26 no.2
• /
• pp.17-19
• /
• 2019