• Communications of Mathematical Education
• /
• v.19 no.3 s.23
• /
• pp.543-556
• /
• 2005

우리 주변에는 수학영재 교육 대상자로 선발되어 영재교육을 받지 않는 학생 중에는 수학적으로 유망한 학생들이 많이 있으며, 이들에게 적절한 프로그램을 제공한다면 수학적 재능을 발휘할 수 있을 것이다. 본고에서는 수학적으로 유망성이 있는 학생들을 위한 프로그램 구성 및 운영 모델의 하나로 개방형 접근법(Open-approach heuristic)모델에 따른 구체적인 지도 방안과 프로그램에 대해서 살펴보고자 한다.

• (The)Korea Educational Review
• /
• v.24 no.1
• /
• pp.227-254
• /
• 2018

This study examines differences in perception between applicants and admissions committee members regarding evaluation criteria for admission to career and technical high schools in Seoul. This investigation, based on "The survey on policy for career and technical high school admissions," seeks to explore and consider the various criteria for selecting and evaluating students. The target populations of the survey were the educators in charge of admission and freshmen in Seoul career and technical high schools. We report three major findings, with the first pertaining to the existing criteria and policies for admission to career and technical high schools. While educators agreed with the intent and reasoning behind the school's competitive spots, they were overall dissatisfied with the selection method and the lack of a requirement for academic transcripts. Matriculated students, in comparison, expressed greater satisfaction with the existing criteria for admission. Secondly, when assessing the importance of various evaluation components in an application, educators viewed the interview and attendance record as the most valuable components of the application, followed by future plans, personal statement, volunteer work, and portfolio, in order of decreasing importance. Students ranked attendance record, interview, personal statement, portfolio, future plans, and volunteer work as most to least important components of their application. Thus, students regarded the personal statement and portfolios as being of higher priority than did the educators. The last major finding pertained to students' rationale for applying and educators' selection criteria. At the time of application, students focused on aptitude and job prospects after graduation, while educators valued personality and competence. In summary, the applicants' viewpoints and actions aligned much more closely with the mission of the Seoul Metropolitan Office of Education than did those of the educators in charge of admission. Thus, in order to establish a consensus between the policy and mission of career and technical high schools, each career and technical high school should clarify the exact criteria for their ideal candidate. There is also a need to bridge the gap in perception between the applicants and educators regarding selection strategy, to establish a harmonized evaluation criteria. These goals are necessary to attract and recruit talented, bright individuals who will meet the demands of today's society.

• Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education
• /
• v.19 no.4
• /
• pp.604-621
• /
• 1999

We analyze the admission test problems used in 1998 at the Science Education Center for Gifted Youth at Kyungpook National University (SECGY, KNU). The test consists of two parts, an evaluation of the scientific thinking skills and an evaluation of the achievement for Mathematics and Sciences, the former of which includes evaluations of scientific process skills and logical thinking skills. The problems for the test of scientific thinking skills were developed and standardized by the Korea Education Development Center, while those of the achievement for Mathematics and Sciences were made at SECGY. We calculate the indices of the difficulty and discrimination for each problem to determine whether or not the test is appropriate to apply for selecting number of gifted students among the recommended students from 389 middle schools in Taegu-city and Kyungsang-pook-do Province. We find that both indices of most problems for the test of scientific thinking skills were out range of the appropriate level and. moreover, even those problems which fall into the appropriate range showed very low efficiencies for distractors. We, thus, conclude that the problems of the test of scientific thinking skills are inappropriate to use as a test for admission to SECGY. On the other hand, the problems of the achievement test showed extreme results; the Mathematics problems appeared to be too difficult, whereas the Physics problems appeared too easy. However, overall scores showed a normal distribution, indicating that those problems played crucial role in selecting gifted students. We finally propose several suggestions in developing the test problems and in selecting students at the SECGY.

• The Science & Technology
• /
• v.32 no.2 s.357
• /
• pp.28-29
• /
• 1999

우리나라 교육은 너무나 동등과 평준화를 내세워 키워야할 인재를 제대로 키우지 못했고 세계적인 대학과 연구소를 세우지도 못한 것이 현실이다. 우수한 학생에게는 그에게 맞는 과목을 가르쳐야 평등이지 모든 학생에게 같은 것을 가르친다고 평등이 되는 것은 아니다. 신입생을 선발하고 교수를 채용하는 일은 완전히 학교측 자율에 맡겨야 한다. 획일적인 동등ㆍ평준화 아래선 일류대학 육성과 세계적 과학자ㆍ노벨상 수상자를 배출할 수 없다.

• 대학교육
• /
• s.96
• /
• pp.62-73
• /
• 1998

효율적인 학부제 운영을 위해서는 학생들의 전공지도를 철저히 하고, 제한된 교육여건을 감안하여 전공학생수의 상한선을 두며, 기초학문 전공자에게 장학금 지급을 확대하고, 학부 1, 2학년에게는 기초학문 과목만 개설한다. 또한 기초-응용학문의 연계전공을 우선적으로 개발하고, 응용학문 분야의 대학원생 선발 시 동계 진학률을 제한하여 타전공자, 특히 기초학문 전공자에게 문호를 개방함으로써 기초-응용학문의 조화로운 발전을 꾀한다.

• Proceedings of the Korean Society for the Gifted Conference
• /
• 1996.04a
• /
• pp.83-89
• /
• 1996

• Cartoon and Animation Studies
• /
• s.22
• /
• pp.1-16
• /
• 2011

The question acutely raised regarding Korea's entrance test is not just a matter of yesterday or today. It is not an exception to cartoon related fields, which lack of creativity and patterning trend, problems according to the types of autonomous performance tests for each school, problem of evaluation are being pointed out. As such alternative, methods such as expansion of time for performance test, introduction of extra performance test for evaluating creativity, and public sector exclusively taking in charge of creativity evaluation, and etc. will be made as the subject of discussion. Therefore, the most important assumption is to establish what Universities are intending to teach to students first, and to teach such thing, the questions of their entrance tests should contain relevant criteria so that students with relevant abilities would be selected. Even after entering school, constant monitoring would be necessary, and if it shows different results as expected, the criteria should be reviewed again. As such, the reason for Universities requiring much things is because the Universities are, the subject of student selection, the subject which requires certain abilities to students, and the subject of evaluation. Therefore, it is because a University can achieve its original purpose only when good talented students are obtained through such process of selection and are developed through education.

• The Korean Journal of Applied Statistics
• /
• v.23 no.5
• /
• pp.987-996
• /
• 2010

The goal of the entrance examination models is to promote promising and potential students who are suitable for post-secondary education purposes. Recently, a promotion system based on the admissions supervisors has been the major role for the promotion of students. Various statistical models and methods should be applied for the better and reasonable promotion of promising Korean and international students. In this study, we applied the proper methods in statistical methodologies and show the meaningful results on the performance evaluation of the several entrance examination models for a university in Seoul, Korea.

• Proceedings of the Korean Society of Computer Information Conference
• /
• 2012.07a
• /
• pp.183-185
• /
• 2012

본 연구의 목적은 지속적인 영재학생 관리를 위해 학생 관리 시스템의 구축 방향을 제시함으로써 영재교육 수혜 경험에 대한 정보들의 누적이 학생들의 진로 진학이나 자아실현을 하기까지 도움을 제공할 수 있도록 하는 것이다. 이를 위하여 학생 관리시스템 구축에 대한 선행 연구를 분석하였으며 분석 결과 효율적인 교육과정 운영을 중심으로 학생의 인적 사항을 관리하거나 그 기관 내에서 학생을 재 선발하고, 학부모와 상담, 영재교육에 대한 연구 자료로 활용하는 데 그치고 있었다. 따라서 본 연구에서는 학생 관리 시스템의 구축 방향으로 전국 영재교육기관에 공통적으로 적용 관리할 수 있는 중앙 센터의 마련, 영재교육기관 간의 시스템 연계, 학생 중심의 시스템 구축을 통한 자아실현 및 진로 진학에 도움 제공, 인성 측면을 반영할 수 있는 시스템 구축, 구체적인 진로 상담 작성이 가능한 항목 마련, 교육과정 반영, 영재교육 보조교사나 전담교사 파견을 통한 철저한 학생 관리를 제시하였다.

• Korean Journal of Comparative Education
• /
• v.26 no.4
• /
• pp.1-30
• /
• 2016

The purposes of this study are to analyze the higher education admission policy of France and to draw policy implications for Korea. For this study, literature reviews and interviews (face-to-face, email, telephone) were adopted for main research methods. The major findings were as follows: First, baccalaur?at diploma is necessary for higher education admission in France but each higher education has different admission policy according to their legal status. University has open enrollment policy and has no student selection process. Other higher institutions such as grands ?coles select students based on students' academic achievements. Second, baccalaur?at is national diploma which shows successful conclusion of the upper secondary education and gives right of access to higher education. This diploma is awarded to candidates who have passed a series of standardized written and oral tests drawn up at national level (10/20points). Third, students' academic achievements in high schools are major criteria for admission for higher institutions which has student selection process. Fourth, entrance exams implemented at college level are various according to higher institution. Last, 'Admission Post-bac-APB' site is used to support and facilitate the whole admission process. Based on these findings, several policy implications were suggested.