• 월간 기계설비
• /
• no.10 s.183
• /
• pp.31-33
• /
• 2005

기계설비공사의 하자담보책임기간은 <건설산업기본법시행령 제30조 관련 별표 4>, <국가를 당사자로 하는 계약에 관한 법 시행규칙 제70조 관련 별표 1> 및 <주택법시행령 제59조 제1항 관련 별표 6>에 의하여 2년 이내로 규정되어 있다. 그러나, 일부 발주기관 및 건설업체에서 기계설비공사의 하자담보책임기간을 법으로 정한 기간을 초과 설정하여 하자보수 비용 및 하자보증수수료 증가 등의 민원이 발생되고 있어, 건설교통부 및 재정경제부는 하자담보책임기간을 법으로 정한 기간을 준수하여 줄 것을 발주기관에 협조 요청한 바 있다. 이와 관련 대한설비건설협회에서는 기계설비공사 하자담보책임기간을 법으로 정한 기간을 정하여 줄 것을, 시공능력 300위 이내의 일반건설업체 대표이사와 하도급계약담당 부서장에게 요청하였다. 또한 계약 체결한 기계설비공사의 하자담보책임기간이 법으로 정한 기간을 상회하는 경우에는 회계통첩에 의하여 계약서상의 기간을 조정하여 하도급계약시에는 법으로 정한 하자담보책임기간을 설정하여 줄 것을 요청하였다.

• Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
• /
• v.2 no.4 s.8
• /
• pp.69-79
• /
• 2001

Characteristics of Contactor's Defect Liability was too many discussed. But it's not clearly defined yet. Because recent Government Construction Projects are very complex and executed through long time, too many conflicts were appeared related to Contactor's Defect Liability. Therefore to analyse and to resolve the conflicts legal aspects of Contactor's Defect Liability stated in Civil Law and Government Contract Act was systematically compared. The result of this research is as follows : (1) Characteristic of Contactor's Defect must be regarded as a breach of Contract and be an incomplete contract implementation. (2) To decide the range of Damage, Characteristic of Defect must be regarded. (3) Contactor's Defect Liability must be effectual from the day of delivery. (4) Retainage must be added to secure the completion during the Contract Period and Defect Repairing Liability must be omitted in the Contract performance Security.

• 주택과사람들
• /
• s.201
• /
• pp.102-103
• /
• 2007

아파트 하자 담보 책임 기간이 지났어도 부실 시공에 따른 아파트 하자 보수 비용은 아파트 건설.분양 업체와 보증 회사에 존속된다는 법원의 판결이 나왔다. 하자 보수 비용에 따른 잇따른 소송으로 책임 소재가 불분명한 경우, 그 비용을 어떻게 해결해나가는지 실례를 들어 살펴보자.

• Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
• /
• v.23 no.2
• /
• pp.65-75
• /
• 2022

On 11 June 2021, the Supreme Court ruled that the judgment of the lower court was justified for the subject case, that the plaintiff could assert the defendant's liability for default due to incomplete performance even though the warranty period for defects which stipulated in the particular condition of the contract has expired. In Korean civil law, the concurrent between the exclusion period for defect warranty and the extinctive prescription for default liability is conceded, since the exclusion period and the extinctive prescription have their respective purposes in law, therefore these two should be judged by harmonizing them based on that they are mutually related. If the subject judgment is generalized, there is no reason to exist for the provisions of defect liability in the construction contract any longer. This study examines the subject judgments through the general theory and precedent case studies on the defect liability and default liability, then derived any problems that may arise if the subject judgment is generalized. In addition, based on a realistic model, it was suggested for a practical improvement method that both the provisions of the warranty period shall be changed realistic and to stipulate the character of its nature as written provisions in the contract.

• 레미콘
• /
• no.7 s.56
• /
• pp.52-61
• /
• 1998

• Korea Trade Review
• /
• v.42 no.6
• /
• pp.1-25
• /
• 2017

This is a comparative and analytical study which comprises of the analysis of the rules of the seller's liability for non-conforming goods of four legal systems under the CISG and the CESL. A purpose of this study is to examine all the rules as to, first, the concept and the nature of the seller's duty to deliver the goods in conformity with the contract, second, the contents of the seller's duty to deliver the goods in conformity with the contract, third, the time when the goods must be in conformity with the contract and the cases where the seller is exempted from his liability for non-conforming goods. Another purpose is to compare the rules of the CISG with those of the CESL, and to evaluate them in light of the discipline of comparative law. This is for the purpose of facilitating the systematic development and reform of one jurisdiction by any solution from the other jurisdiction found by the comparative study. In addition, this study provides legal and practical advice to the contracting parties when they intend to use one of those regimes in their contract as a governing law.

• Journal of the Korea Institute of Building Construction
• /
• v.10 no.1
• /
• pp.101-109
• /
• 2010

Under the Civil Code and related law in Korea, the liability for defects after delivery belongs to the Contractor. However, various disputes have occurred in relation to the remedy of such defects and the compensation for damages, which are the main liability of a contractor in the event of defects. Despite court decisions regarding defect liability, many problems prevail in the real world. For this reason, this working-level research considers the introduction of a performance warranty contract system. To establish the system successfully, it is necessary to analyze the trend of various warranty cases in the US. Therefore, the warranty system of the US was first examined, and the effect of acceptance, notification and burden of proof, remedies under warranty clauses, and default termination were investigated and analyzed in this study.

• Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture
• /
• v.40 no.4
• /
• pp.104-113
• /
• 2012

This study aimed to find out the improvement plan through analyzing the perception of the expert group engaged in landscape architectural construction and to focus on analyzing the expert groups' experience on Landscape Construction Defects (LCD), defect liability, warranty period, and implementation of the defect liability. The results are as follows: 1. Regarding the experience on the LCD, landscape construction contractors were an awareness of the LCD issue at a serious level, while public-sector clients recognize moderately the LCD issue; and on the first priority in defect implementation, landscape construction contractors considered repair cost while public-sector clients value the identifying causes of defects. 2. In disagreement on the defect liability, landscape construction contractors attributed it to client's lack of responsibility for maintenance while public-sector clients ascribed it to the absence of dealing a criteria with LCD, and regarding the appropriate defect implementation, public-sector clients preferred the following objective by dealing the criteria with LCD while landscape construction contractors advocates by sharing the responsibilities for dealing with LCD based on the identified causes of construction defects. 3. Regarding the warranty period, the public-sector clients considered the 2-year warranty period as appropriate while landscape construction contractors considered it comparatively long, and concerning the commencement of defect warranty period, the public-sector clients viewed it as it should commence to cover the overall completion of the construction while landscape construction contractors perceived it to start on the completion of each work. 4. As for the improvement of the defect implementation system, public-sector clients considered it necessary to establish the objective dealing the criteria with LCD while landscape construction contractors viewed the legislation of maintenance duty. Also, with regard to the important value in establishing and dealing the criteria with LCD, public-sector clients pointed out the objective of the criteria for determining the defects per work type while landscape construction contractors suggested client (user)'s maintenance duty. Because of research, because the system in dealing with LCD is an absence of LCD management agency and dealing the criteria with LCD, it is needed to establish an LCD management agency and make the system in dealing with LCD.

• Proceedings of the Korean Institute Of Construction Engineering and Management
• /
• 2004.11a
• /
• pp.366-369
• /
• 2004

Construction demands will become high. Defects liability is treating with a consumer on a defect. Maintenance bond is overlooking excessive responsibility of construction industry participants. This study classified the problem that are divided to systematic and internal matter. And this study presented an improvement proposal. An improvement proposal of a process may reduce a financial burden of contractors and sub-contractors. And improved rate decision will do additional consideration of the study result, so that it is appropriated a rate rationally.

• Proceedings of the Korean Institute of Building Construction Conference
• /
• 2017.05a
• /
• pp.274-275
• /
• 2017

Decree on the Management of Apartment Houses. Article 36 (Liability for warranty Repair Defects), Article 37 (About Repair Defect, etc), and its implementing ordinances, Article 36 (Term of warranty liability) Article 37 (Defect criteria), Article 38 (procedure of Repair defect), Article 39 (type of warranty liability), Enforcement Rule Article 17 (Certifiation of warranty liability). On the basis of the upper Decree, In spite of Standard and forms of 'Completion of Repair Defect' was exist, it was hard to receive 'End of Confirmation' in practice. The purpose of this study is to propose basics in order that Practitioners can apply problems and improvements about Decree on the Management of Apartment Houses.