• Transactions of the KSME C: Technology and Education
• /
• v.4 no.1
• /
• pp.19-26
• /
• 2016

This paper presents the measurement and analysis results for the performance of HGCHP system using a cooling tower as a supplemental heat rejector. In order to demonstrate the performance of the hybrid approach, we installed the monitoring equipments including sensors for measuring temperature and power consumption, and measured operation parameters from February 1, 2014 to February 28, 2015. Leaving load temperatures to building showed an average value of $11.7^{\circ}C$ for cooling and $39.5^{\circ}C$ for heating, respectively. From the analysis, the daily PF of hybrid GCHP system varied from 2.6 to 6.6 over the measurement period.

• 한국신재생에너지학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 2006.11a
• /
• pp.202-205
• /
• 2006

최근 지열원 열펌프 시스템 설치가 해마다 평균 10-30%젓도 꾸주히 증가하고 있다 주요 연구동향은 토양열전도 측정, 지열히트펌프 시스템 전주기 성능평가 하이브리드 시스템의 초기비용 저감과 이러한 지열원 열펌프 시스템 설계방법분야 개발에 대해 초점이 맞춰지고 있다. 특히 국내에서 현재 시공되어진 많은 시스템들이 부실시공의 문제에 노출되고 있으며 이러한 시점에서 현재의 저가 입찰제도 보다는 외국 사례와 같은 성능확인 제도로의 전환 및 많은 연구가 필요하다. 성능확인제도는 사전 성능 예측과 사후 성능 확인 검증으로 구성되며 본 기술현안 보고서는 최근 국내외 연구동향 및 사전 성능 예측과 사후 성능 검증 관하여 정리하여 본다.

• Korea Journal of Geothermal Energy
• /
• v.7 no.3
• /
• pp.33-37
• /
• 2011

• Proceedings of the SAREK Conference
• /
• 2006.06a
• /
• pp.1238-1243
• /
• 2006

최근 열펌프 시스템 설치가 해마다 평균 10-30% 정도 꾸준히 증가하고 있다. IEA HP Annex 28, 29('열펌프 성능평가 기술', '열펌프 시장 현황 현안')등 국제공동연구를 통한 꾸준한 지열원 열펌프 시스템 응용분야의 발전은 기존의 지열원 시스템에 비해 비용과 더불어 보다 많은 에너지 절감효과를 가져왔다. 지열기술의 성공적 사용여부는 기술의 견실함, 설계기술의 개발, 기반시설설치, 히트펌프와 부품제조업자의 반응에 기인한다. 최근 주요 연구동향은 토양열전도 측정, 지열히트펌프 시스템 전주기 성능평가, 하이브리드 시스템의 초기비용 절감과 이러한 열펌프 시스템 설계방법분야 개발에 대해 초점이 맞춰지고 있다. 본 기술현안 보고서는 최근 국내외 연구동향을 정리하여 본다.

• The Magazine of the Society of Air-Conditioning and Refrigerating Engineers of Korea
• /
• v.42 no.12
• /
• pp.94-97
• /
• 2013

• Journal of the Korean Society for Geothermal and Hydrothermal Energy
• /
• v.17 no.4
• /
• pp.59-67
• /
• 2021

In this study, the performance of the single heat source system and the hybrid system was comparatively analyzed. Case 1 is a ground heat source system, and Case 2 is a water heat source system. Case 3, a hybrid system, reduced the capacity of the ground heat source and applied a water heat source as an auxiliary heat source, and Case 4 was composed of a system that applied a water heat source as an auxiliary heat source to the ground heat source system. As a result of the simulation, in case 3, energy consumption was reduced by up to 2.67% compared to ground sources for cooling. In Case 4, COP was improved by up to 10.02% compared to ground sources during cooling, and EST was calculated to be 2.42℃ lower. During heating, 0.83% was improved compared to the water heat source. At this time, the EST was calculated to be 2.25℃ higher than the water heat source.

• Journal of the Korean Society for Geothermal and Hydrothermal Energy
• /
• v.18 no.3
• /
• pp.19-30
• /
• 2022

In this study, comparative analysis of energy performance in Taebaek city, a test area, by applying hydrothermal, geothermal source and hybrid heat pump system to office, school and smart farms with different internal heat loads. The conclusion is as follows. In the load characteristics by use of buildings, it was found that office had a large cooling load compared to heating load, school had a large heating load compared to cooling load, and smart farm had only cooling load year-round. Performance analysis of the heat pump system in office shows that the cooling COP of the hydrothermal source is 5.12% and the heating COP is 3.22% lower based on the geothermal source, the cooling COP of the hybrid is 0.41% higher, and the heating COP is the difference in performance appeared sparsely. The performance analysis of the heat pump system in school showed that the cooling COP of the hydrothermal source was 10.44% and the heating COP 3.22% lower based on the geothermal source, and the performance difference between the hybrid cooling and heating COP was insignificant. Heat pump system performance analysis in smart farm only occurred with cooling load. Based on geothermal sources, the cooling COP of the hydrothermal source was 46% and the cooling COP of the hybrid was 19.65%, respectively.

• The Magazine of the Society of Air-Conditioning and Refrigerating Engineers of Korea
• /
• v.39 no.6
• /
• pp.41-46
• /
• 2010

시설 재배용 온실에 적용된 냉온수 축열이 결합된 지열 히트펌프시스템에 대하여 설치사례를 소개하였다.

• Journal of the Korean Society for Geothermal and Hydrothermal Energy
• /
• v.16 no.3
• /
• pp.8-16
• /
• 2020

This paper presents the heating performance analysis results of a ground-source heat pump (GSHP) system using hybrid ground heat exchanger (HGHE). In this paper, the HGHE refers to the ground heat exchanger (GHE) using both a surface water heat exchanger (SWHE) and a vertical GHE. In order to evaluate the system performance, we installed monitoring sensors for measuring temperatures and power consumption, and then measured operation data with 4 different load burdened ratios of the HGHE. During the entire measurement period, the average heating capacity of the heat pump was 37.3 kW. In addition, the compressor of the heat pump consumed 9.4 kW of power, while the circulating pump of the HGHE used 6.7 kW of power. Therefore, the average heating coefficient of performance (COP) for the heat pump unit was 4.0, while the system including the circulating pump was 2.7. Finally, the parallel use of SWHE and VGHE was beneficial to the system performance; however, further researches are needed to optimize the design data for various load ratios of the HGHE.

• Korean Journal of Air-Conditioning and Refrigeration Engineering
• /
• v.24 no.2
• /
• pp.102-110
• /
• 2012

The objective of this study is to improve the performance of a hybrid ground source heat pump (HGSHP) by optimizing the flow distribution ratio of secondary fluid flow rate between a ground loop and a supplemental loop. Initially, a conventional ground source heat pump (GSHP) was tested to determine an optimum flow rate of the secondary fluid. Based on the selected optimum value, the HGSHP was also tested by varying the flow distribution ratio of the secondary fluid flow rate between the ground loop and the supplemental loop, such as 9:1, 7:3, 5:5, and 3:7. The results showed that the optimum flow distribution ratio of the secondary fluid flow rate was 7:3. The COP of the HGSHP was improved by 19% over the GSHP at a flow distribution ratio of 7:3 and an entering water temperature of $40^{\circ}C$.