• Proceedings of the Korean Institute of Navigation and Port Research Conference
• /
• 2012.06a
• /
• pp.591-593
• /
• 2012

매년 우리나라 태풍 내습 시에는 진해만으로 피항 선박이 폭주하여 피항선박들의 피항지에서의 해양사고 사고 발생 가능성이 매우 높은 실정이다. 본 연구에서는 진해만의 태풍 피항지로서의 특성과 피항선박들의 실태에 대해서 조사 분석하였다. 또한 피항지에서 체류하는 동안 발생한 해양사고 유형을 분석하여 유사사고를 예방하기 위한 대책을 검토하였다. 특히 VTS의 관제를 통한 해양사고경감 방안을 제시함과 동시에 피항선박들 및 선사 및 관련 기관들의 적극적인 협력이 절대적으로 요청되고 있음을 밝혔다.

• Proceedings of the Korean Institute of Navigation and Port Research Conference
• /
• 2018.05a
• /
• pp.147-149
• /
• 2018

선박에 대한 해적의 해상공격이 끊임없이 일어나고 있지만, 이를 피하기 위한 조선방법에 명확한 지침이 없는 것이 현실이다. 선박조종시뮬레이터를 이용하여 승선을 위해 접근하는 상황에서 해적선과 공격대상선박의 충돌에 대한 시뮬레이션 시나리오를 구성하였다. 선박조종시뮬레이션은 마주치는 상황, 횡단하는 상황, 추월하는 상황을 각각 구성하여 수행하였으며, 수행결과에 따라 적절한 피항 방법 및 피항침로 선정, 적절한 대처방안에 대한 결과를 도출하였다. 향후 보다 다양한 상황에서 승선을 위해 접근하는 해적선의 피항 방법 및 대처방안에 대한 추가적인 연구가 필요한 것으로 판단된다.

• Journal of the Korean Society of Fisheries and Ocean Technology
• /
• v.19 no.2
• /
• pp.99-105
• /
• 1983

In the Steering and Sailing Rules of International Regulations for Preventing Collicions at Sea, 1972, any relative distance between two vessels necessary for taking action to avoid collision in head-on situation is not referred. In this paper, the author analyzed the ship's collision avoiding actions from a viewpoint of ship motions and worked out mathematical formulas to calculate the relative distances necessary for collision avoiding actions. Figuring out the values of maneuvering indices through experiments of actual ships, the author applied these values to the calculationg formulas and calculated the minimum safe relative distances. On the assumption that two vessels same in size and condition are approaching each other in head-on situation, the minimum safe relative distance was calculated as 5.0 times, sufficient safe relative one as 10.0 times their own length.

• Journal of the Korean Society of Marine Environment & Safety
• /
• v.16 no.1
• /
• pp.101-106
• /
• 2010

Marine transportation system plays an important role in maintaining and promoting economic activities among countries. The accurate understanding of marine traffic flows are necessary for the further advancement of marine transportation system. While many existing researches on marine traffic have been conducted mainly on the basis of statistical analysis using traffic data, ship's traffic flow simulation model was developed in this study. A collision avoidance algorithm was conducted with categorizing of traffic factors such as ship's length and speed. The developed model was also verified by a simulation process.

• Proceedings of the Korean Institute of Navigation and Port Research Conference
• /
• 2011.06a
• /
• pp.10-12
• /
• 2011

과거 충돌회피를 위한 알고리즘은 충돌위험을 결정하는데 항해사 대신 위험도를 판단하여 충돌회피를 하려고 한다. 그러나 경우에 따라서 국제해상충돌예방규칙에 맞지 않게 충돌 회피를 시행한다. 또한 타선과의 피항 관계를 항해사가 주시하고 기억해야 하는 것은 항해사에게 부담을 줄 수 있다. 따라서 국제해상충돌예방규칙에 맞게 피항 관계를 정의하여 항해사에게 알려줌으로써 피항 행동을 결정하는데 시간 및 인적 실수를 줄여줄 것으로 기대한다.

• Journal of the Korean Society of Marine Environment & Safety
• /
• v.25 no.2
• /
• pp.169-177
• /
• 2019

It is very important to understand the intention of a target ship to prevent collisions in multiple-ship situations. However, considering the intentions of a large number of ships at the same time is a great burden for the officer who must establish a collision avoidance plan. With a distributed algorithm, a ship can exchange information with a large number of target ships and search for a safe course. In this paper, I have applied a Distributed Stochastic Search Algorithm (DSSA), a distributed algorithm, for ship collision avoidance. A ship chooses the course that offers the greatest cost reduction or keeps its current course according to probability and constraints. DSSA is divided into five types according to the probability and constraints mentioned. In this paper, the five types of DSSA are applied for ship collision avoidance, and the effects on ship collision avoidance are analyzed. In addition, I have investigated which DSSA type is most suitable for collision avoidance. The experimental results show that the DSSA-A and B schemes offered effective ship collision avoidance. This algorithm is expected to be applicable for ship collision avoidance in a distributed system.

• Proceedings of the Korean Institute of Navigation and Port Research Conference
• /
• 2009.10a
• /
• pp.119-120
• /
• 2009

It has been reported that most accidents are caused by human factors. and especially collisions occurred by human are more than 80 percent. Thus we have to understand how mariners generally deal the own operating ship to avoid the target ship. what information they require. and so on. The aim of this paper is to clarify the important factors influencing mariners' decision-making in the situation of collision avoidance. As a result, main factors in each process for collision avoidance were analyzed.

• Journal of the Korean Society of Fisheries and Ocean Technology
• /
• v.32 no.4
• /
• pp.363-371
• /
• 1996

The Steering and Sailing Rules of International Regulations for Preventing Collisions at Sea now in use direct the best aid - action to avoid collision by the stand - on vessel. But these rules do not refer to the safety relative distance between two vessels when she should take such action. In this paper, the author analyzed the ship's collision avoiding actions from the viewpoint of ship motions and worked out mathematical formulas to calculate the relative distances necessary for taking action to avoid collision. Figuring out the values of maneuvering indices through experiments of 11 actual ships of small, medium, large and mammoth size, the author applied these values to the calculating formulas and calculated the minimum relative distances. The main results are as follows: 1. It was confIrmed that the stand - on vessel should keep the greatest relative distance for taking best aid - action to avoid collision when the cross angle of course was $90^{\circ}$ and near it(70-$90^{\circ}$ ). 2. When the cross angle of course was $90^{\circ}$ , the minimum relative distance of small vessel(GT: 160-650tons) was found to be more than about 6.8 times of her own length, and those of medium(GT : 2,300-3,500tons), large(GT : 22,OOO-62,OOOtons) and mammoth(GT : 91,000-139,000tons) vessels were found to be more than about 9.0 times, about 5.4 times and about 6.8 times of their own lengths. 3. It was confIrmed that collision danger was greater when crossing angle was obtuse than in an acute angle, therefore greater relative distance was to be kept by the stand - on vessel for taking best aid - action to avoid collision in the case of the obtuse angle. 4. In every vessels, in the case of $90^{\circ}$ cross angle of course the safety minimum relative distance was found to be more than about 9.0 times of their own lengths.

• Proceedings of the Korean Institute of Navigation and Port Research Conference
• /
• 2011.11a
• /
• pp.21-22
• /
• 2011

In this study, an analytical algorithm for collision avoidance is proposed, which is applicable to designing collision avoidance maneuvers for two encountering ships. The minimum separation distance is defined and an appropriate maneuver sequence is computed for safe and effective collision avoidance. Two approaches: 1) collision avoidance through speed change and 2) collision avoidance through heading change, are considered, and the initiation point of the avoidance maneuver is computed analytically using the geometric configuration of the two encountering ships. To verify the feasibility of the proposed algorithm, numerical simulations are carried out using a set of ship-to-ship encountering scenarios.

• Journal of the Korean Society of Fisheries and Ocean Technology
• /
• v.14 no.2
• /
• pp.97-112
• /
• 1978

The rule 15, 16 and 17 of International Regulations for Preventing collisions at Sea direct actions to avoid collision when two power-driven vessels are crossing. But these rules do not present the safety minimum approaching distances outside which a give- way vessel deeps out of the way of a stand-on vessel. In this paper, the author analyzed the ship's collision avoiding actions from a viewpoint of ship kinematics as the method to calculate this distance. The author worked out mathematic formulas for calculating the safety minimum approaching distances outside which the give-way vessel takes the actions to avoid collisions in accordance with the cross angles of the crossing vessels' courses. Figuring out actually the values of maneuvering indices of the M. S. Koan Ack San (GT: 224tons), the training ship of the National Fisheries University of Busan and the M. S. Golden Clover (GT: 101, 235tons) of the Eastern Shipping Co., Ltd. through their Z test, the author applied these values to the calculating formulas and calculated the safety minimum approaching distances. The results of calculations are as follows; 1. The greatest distance is to be kept by the give-way vessel to avoid collision when the cross angle of courses is 90$^{\circ}$ or near it. In such case the safety minimum approaching distance of a small vessel must be more than 5 times of her own length and that of a large vessel more than 11 times of her own length. 2. Collision danger is greater when crossing angle is obtuse than in an acute angle, therefore greater distance is to be kept by the give-way vessel to avoid collision in the case of the obtuse angle. 3. The actions to be taken to avoid collisions by the give-way vessel in Rule 16 and by the stand-on vessel in Rule 17(a)(ii) of International Regulations for Preventing Collisions at Sea, must be done outside the above safety minimum approaching distance. When inevitably such actions are to be taken within the safety minimum approaching distance, they should be accompanied with engine motions.