• Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education
• /
• v.32 no.2
• /
• pp.210-235
• /
• 2012

The purpose of this study was to develop a valid and reliable assessment tool for measuring scientific creative problem solving ability for middle school students. To achieve this aim, an assessment framework, four assessment items, and detailed rubrics for scientific creative problem solving were developed. The assessment framework had three dimensions (i.e. science contents, inquiry process, and thinking skills) and sub-elements for each dimension. The assessment items were tested with 320 middle school students in order to determine reliability, difficulty, and item discrimination. Science teachers and experts in science education checked the validity of the items and the rubrics. The results proved that the assessment tool was reliable enough to evaluate students' scientific creative problem solving skills.

• Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education
• /
• v.30 no.5
• /
• pp.647-667
• /
• 2010

The purpose of this study was to develop a brain-based analysis framework for evaluating teachinglearning program in science. To develop the framework, this study categorized educational constructs of the teachinglearning programs into one of three teaching-learning factors: cognition, motive, and emotion, using previous studies on science program. Ninety-three articles on the brain functions associated with science program were analyzed to extract brain activation regions related to the three educational constructs. After delineating the brain activation regions, we designed the brain function map, "the CORE Brain Map." Based on this brain map, we developed a brain-based analysis framework for evaluating science teaching-learning program using R & D processes. This framework consists of the brain regions, the bilateral dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, the bilateral ventrolateral prefrontal cortex, the bilateral orbitofrontal cortex, the anterior cingulate gyrus, the bilateral parietal cortex, the bilateral temporal cortex, the bilateral occipital cortex, the bilateral hippocampus, the bilateral amygdala, the bilateral nucleus accumbens, the bilateral striatum and the midbrain regions. These brain regions are associated with the aforementioned three educational factors; cognition, motivation, and emotion. The framework could be applied to the analysis and diagnosis of various teaching and learning programs in science.

• Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education
• /
• v.32 no.4
• /
• pp.604-624
• /
• 2012

This study aims to design a framework for analyzing group argumentation in terms of participants' interaction. Regarding the current group argumentation setting as argumentation on socio-scientific issues within participants who have had limited experience on group argumentation, the analytical framework was designed to explain (1) what was each participant's role on group argumentation, (2) how these roles were changed within each time of argumentation, and (3) how the patterns of interaction were changed through seven times of a series of argumentation on socio-scientific issues. Based on the literature review on analytical framework of argumentation in science education including the works on the structure of argumentation, the discourse formation through interaction, and the linguistic approach on participants' interaction, the current research framework was built. Showing the results of applying the designed framework on group argumentation as an example, strength of using the current designed framework was discussed.

• Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society
• /
• v.37 no.2
• /
• pp.97-126
• /
• 2006

According to the 7th education curriculum and advent of information society people expect the school library to do various things. Based on an evaluation model of education policy, the policy process of the school library was divided into an agenda setting, policy making and policy implementation. Then I developed a method of evaluation from an administrative and political point of view. Using this, I analyzed problems with school library policy and I categorized them. I suggested better solutions for Improving the school library policy.

• Asia Marketing Journal
• /
• v.3 no.4
• /
• pp.38-58
• /
• 2001

본 연구는 소비자들이 제품을 평가하는 과정에서 각 유형의 단서정보들이 평가과정에 어떻게 영향을 주는지를 살펴 봄으로써, 이론적으로는 정보단서와 관련하여 소비자의 제품평가 및 판단과정을 설명하는 기본적인 틀을 제시하고, 이를 통해 기업의 마케팅 및 광고전략에 대한 관리적 시사점을 제공하였다. 본 연구에서 이용된 단서의 유형은 외재적 단서(extrinsic cues)와 내재적 단서(intrinsic cues)를 이용하였다(Olson 1972; Olson and Jacoby 1973). 분석결과에 따르면 비전문가의 경우 내재적 단서는 제품평가에 영향을 미치지 못하지만 외재적 단서는 제품평가를 좀 더 우호적으로 수행하는 역할을 하였다. 이와는 달리 전문가는 외재적 단서가 아닌 내재적 단서가 제품평가에 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 그리고 전문가는 내재적 단서 관련 사고를 더 많이 하며 강한 내재적 단서에 접근 가능할수록 그 성향이 증가하나 비전문가의 경우에는 외재적 단서 관련 사고를 더 많이 함으로써 외재적 단서를 더 많이 처리한다. 그러나 비전문가는 전문가와는 달리 외재적 단서의 강도가 단서 관련 사고의 수를 증가시키지는 않는 것을 알 수 있다. 또한 전문가는 내재적 단서관련사고의 우호성이, 반대로 비전문가는 외재적 단서관련사고의 우호성이 제품평가에 미치는 영향을 매개하는 것으로 나타났다. 이러한 연구결과는 소비자의 제품평가과정에서 단서의 효과에 따른 영향을 제시해주는 유용한 개념적인 틀이 될 것이며 향후 연구에서 다양한 확장연구가 필요할 것이다.

• Journal of the Korean Chemical Society
• /
• v.65 no.1
• /
• pp.25-36
• /
• 2021

This study aimed to analyze achievement characteristics of Korean students in the results of PISA 2018 science domain. To this end, the characteristics of PISA 2009 to PISA 2018 science were analyzed in terms of the percentage of each performance level and the ratio of male and female by achievement level; in addition, the percentage of correct answers by framework subscale was compared with PISA 2015. The results showed that Korea has a higher percentage of students at the lower level of achievement as compared to the high-ranking countries of PISA, and the ratio of students at the higher level of achievement was lower. On average, the difference in achievement between boys and girls was negligible; however, but at the higher achievement level, the ratio of boys continued to be higher than that of girls. In addition, in the PISA science framework, the percentage of correct answers of the questions corresponding to 'personal' of 'contexts', 'evaluate and design scientific enquiry' of 'competencies', 'epistemic' of 'knowledge', and 'high' of 'cognitive demand' increased; similarly, and achievement improved as compared to PISA 2015. Based on these results of the study, we propose a method for improving teaching and evaluation to foster Korean students' scientific competence.

• Product Safety
• /
• s.61
• /
• pp.12-15
• /
• 1998

지난호에 이어 마지막으로 MB상 평가기준상의 7대영역의 기본개념을 살펴보면 이렇다. '리더십'은 비전과 방향을 제시하는 가운데 끊임없는 개선을 통해 전종업원이 고객의 니즈를 충족시키도록 이끄는 일을 뜻하며, '정보'는 현대의 경영상태를 올바로 파악하고 개선할 목적으로 고객정보와 경쟁사정보를 사실에 근거하여 수집평가하고 자사정보와 비교평가함으로써 객관적인 의사결정을 내릴 수 있도록 하는데 그 뜻이 있다.

• 한국지구과학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 2004.09a
• /
• pp.37-44
• /
• 2004

• 한국지구과학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 2004.09a
• /
• pp.45-50
• /
• 2004

• The Science & Technology
• /
• v.33 no.10 s.377
• /
• pp.53-57
• /
• 2000

우수연구자 등 지원체제 4가지 틀 유지, SCI 등 수준 높은 연구논문에 가중치