• The Korean Journal of Financial Management
• /
• v.24 no.1
• /
• pp.85-107
• /
• 2007

In this study, I analyzed determinant factors of mutual fund return. The samples was distributed into three types according to the ratio of included stocks in funds. The proxies of mutual funds were set up three ways(returns of fund). As a result of the analysis, I found that growth positively affect to fund return, abnormal return and adjusted abnormal return in all samples. While, according to three types of sample, expected and unexpected fund cash flows had differently effect on fund return. Inferentially, it seemed that the ratio of included stocks in fund was the cause of that. But price pressure hypothesis are not supported. In conclusion, it was not found the possibility of stock market disturbance in this analysis.

• 한국벤처창업학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 2009.08a
• /
• pp.141-160
• /
• 2009

본 연구에서는 국내 공모 부동산펀드를 임대형과 대출형으로 나누어 이들 펀드수익률의 결정요인을 분석하여 보았다. 펀드수익률은 왜도와 첨도가 매우 높은 분포를 따르기 때문에, 본 연구에서는 회귀분석으로 추정된 잔차가 정규분포를 따르도록 극단 관찰치를 충분히 제거한 표본을 사용하였다. 분석 결과, 부동산펀드의 (초과)수익률에 영향을 주는 유의적인 요인으로 규모, 운용보수, 기간 등이 발견되었다. 또한 특이하게도 이들 결정요인은 두 유형에 대해 각기 상반된 방향으로 영향을 주고 있다. 임대형 부동산펀드의 경우는 규모, 운용보수가 펀드수익률에 유의미한 음의 영향을 미치는 반면, 대출형 부동산펀드의 경우는 규모, 운용보수 및 기간도 펀드수익률에 유의적인 양의 영향을 주었다. 이러한 결과는 국내 공모 부동산펀드는 임대형과 대출형이 매우 다른 경제적 성격을 가지고 있으며 향후 연구에서도 두 유형을 분리할 필요가 있음을 시사한다.

• Proceedings of the Korean Operations and Management Science Society Conference
• /
• 2006.05a
• /
• pp.1777-1783
• /
• 2006

일반적으로 펀드평가는 절대수익률이나 위험을 조정한 샤프지수 또는 트레이너 지수를 이용하고 있는데, 이러한 방법은 벤치마크 지수를 기준으로 평가하여 펀드규모, 비용 등을 고려한 펀드간의 상대적 성과는 측정하지 못하고 있다. 펀드간의 상대적 성과평가는 펀드의 실질적인 효율성을 측정할 수 있다는 측면에서 펀드평가의 유용한 수단이 될 수 있다. 본 연구에서는 샤프의 스타일 분석을 이용하여 펀드의 유형을 분류하고, DEA를 이용하여 펀드간의 상대적인 성과를 측정한다. 분석자료는 2000년 1월부터 2005년 12월 31일까지의 주식형 펀드의 월간수익률, 수익률 표준편차, 펀드비용, 펀드규모, 운용기간, 샤프지수 등을 이용한다.

• Proceedings of the Korean Operations and Management Science Society Conference
• /
• 2006.11a
• /
• pp.180-183
• /
• 2006

일반적으로 펀드는 벤치마크 대비 초과수익률 달성을 목표로 운용된다. 뮤추얼펀든, 헤지펀드, 연기금펀드, 사모투자펀드 등의 경우, 펀드의 운용 목표가 뚜렷하기 때문에 해당 펀드의 성과는 벤치마크와 목표수익률을 기준으로 측정될 수 있다. 그러나 우리나라 시장의 경우에는 펀드 내에 벤치마크운용, 사모전용, 헤지펀드기법, 절대수익 전략 등이 혼재되어 있기 때문에 이들 펀드에 대하여 전통적인 벤치마크 기법을 적용하는 것은 정확한 성과측정을 위한 방법으로는 적절하지 못하다. 본 연구에서는 펀드의 운용전략이나 목표가 혼재된 국내시장에서 비벤치마크 기법이 펀드 평가에 유용성이 있는지를 분석한다.

• Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship
• /
• v.14 no.6
• /
• pp.1-9
• /
• 2019

Since 2005, Korea Venture Investment Corp. (KVIC) has been managing Korean Fund of Funds (KFoF) which helped greatly the domestic venture capitals create their private funds. Its contribution, however, is not limited fetching the pump. When KFoF decides to invest in VC funds, it demands very strict rules the VC funds need to follow before and after their investments in private equities. Whether this tight control of investments does hinder GPs' creativity or rather enhance GPs' transparency and professionalism is an open question subject to empirical tests. If KFoF is only fetching the pump, and neither fund size or time horizon improves VC funds' return rates, then KFoF's involvement in VC funds should not be positively related to VC funds' return rates. If, on the other hand, KFoF harms GPs' creativity, KFoF's involvement should be negatively related to VC funds' performances. Still, if KFoF promotes GPs' transparency and professionalism, its presence in VC funds should positively affect the returns earned by VC funds. Even when KFoF only got to get quality VC funds because those GPs good enough to stand up to the tight conditions set forth by KFoF, the empirical implication will yield the same results. In this article, empirical tests are carried out using the data provided by Korea Venture Capital Association. The VC funds formed and liquidated from 2000 to 2018 are selected for the tests. The results show that VC funds with the presence of KFoF exceed VC funds without KFoF in returns, which supports the hypothesis that KFoF enhances transparency and professionalism of VC funds.

• Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship
• /
• v.17 no.1
• /
• pp.29-43
• /
• 2022

This study measures the realized rate of return of venture capital(VC) fund at the level of investment agreement(as opposed to fund level returns reported by most of the relevant studies). It also measures the stock price return of the VC's portfolio firms (unlisted start-ups) at firm level(as opposed to fund returns) and its variance for the first time using unique data of the VC funds held by the Korean Venture Capital Association. Results of the analysis confirm that VC fund returns exceed individual stock price returns. Additionally, it is confirmed that VC portfolio firms exhibit a positive relationship between risk and return measured by total risk. Finally, we find that stock price returns at firm level are lower than that implied by the associated levels of risk. Consequently, this may make individual investors hesitate to directly buy unlisted startups' stocks even when investment in individual startup companies guarantees high risk-high returns relationship.

• Proceedings of the Korean Operations and Management Science Society Conference
• /
• 2006.11a
• /
• pp.409-412
• /
• 2006

펀드의 성과 평가는 펀드선택 의사결정시 가장 중요한 고려요인이다. 전통적인 펀드 성과평과 지표인 샤프비율이나 트레이너 비율은 운용비용과 거래비용 등과 같은 다양한 요소들을 반영하지 못하고 있다. 펀드의 여러 수익과 비용요인들을 반영하기 위해, 본 연구에서는 DEA를 이용하여 펀드의 상대적인 효율성을 측정하였다. 분석자료는 2005년 12월 31일까지 국내에 존재하는 3년 이상 운용된 67개의 장기펀드를 대상으로 분석하였다. 입력변수는 비용과 관련된 총 보수율, 월수익률의 표준편차, 펀드 규모를 나타내기 위한 평균설정좌수를 이용하였고 출력변수는 이익과 관련된 예상 월평균수익률과 시장포트폴리오의 월수익률을 상회한 기간의 비율을 사용하였다. 본 연구결과, DEA를 통해 수익률만으로는 평가할 수 없는 펀드의 운용능력을 평가할 수 있었다.

• 주택과사람들
• /
• s.210
• /
• pp.76-81
• /
• 2007

부동산 펀드에 투자자들의 관심이 집중되고 있다. 정부의 각종 세금 정책으로 부동산 실물 투자엔 찬바람이 불고 있는 반면, 펀드는 정기 예금 금리보다 훨씬 높은 수익률로 재미가 쏠쏠하기 때문. 투자자들의 관심을 증폭시키는 부동산 펀드를 집중 분석한다.

• The Korean Journal of Applied Statistics
• /
• v.23 no.5
• /
• pp.783-797
• /
• 2010

Based on the importance of asset allocation in the return of an investment portfolio, this article attempts to verify the appropriateness of mutual funds as means of investment to obtain optimal asset allocation. The return-based style analysis is applied to determine a mutual fund's allocation(or a style) among a set of specified asset classes. Assuming a particular investor who defines a range allowed a fund's style to differ from its original one, it is examined whether or not the fund style is continued over an investment time horizon. After verifying the fact that the original style of the investment fails to remain unchanged from the empirical analysis limited to domestic equity mutual funds, we further investigated the reasons for the style drift. Despite several limitations of the analysis, it yields the conclusion that domestic equity mutual funds do not seem to be an appropriate investment tool to achieve a target asset allocation.

• The Korean Journal of Financial Management
• /
• v.27 no.2
• /
• pp.35-62
• /
• 2010

This paper examines the existence of the fund performance persistence and the smart money effect in Korean stock market and tests the flow-induced price pressure (FIPP) hypothesis, that is, fund flows affect individual stock returns and mutual fund performance. This paper also tests whether the FIPP effect can cause the performance persistence using the monthly returns and stock holdings data of 2,702 Korean mutual funds from January 2002 to June 2008. The empirical results indicate that the performance persistence exists significantly for a long time but the smart money effect does not. The hedge portfolio constructed by buying funds with the highest past 12 months performance and selling funds with the lowest past 12 months performance earns 0.11%~1.05% monthly abnormal returns, on average, in 3 years from portfolio formation month, but the hedge portfolio constructed by buying funds with the highest past net fund inflows and selling funds with the lowest past net fund inflows cannot earn positive monthly abnormal returns and the size of negative abnormal returns of the portfolio increase as time goes on. We find the evidence that the FIPP hypothesis is significantly supported. We first estimate the FIPP measure for each individual stock using the trading volume resulting from past fund flows and then construct the hedge portfolio by buying stocks with the highest FIPP measure and selling stocks with the lowest FIPP measure. That portfolio earns significantly positive abnormal return, 1.01% at only portfolio formation month and cannot earn significant abnormal returns after formation month. But, the FIPP effect cannot cause the performance persistence because, within the same FIPP measure group, funds with higher past performance still earn higher monthly abnormal returns than those with lower past performance by 0.08%~0.77%, on average, in 2 years. These results imply that the main cause of the performance persistence in Korean stock market is the difference of fund managers' ability rather than the FIPP effect.