• 발명특허
• /
• v.12 no.2 s.132
• /
• pp.46-47
• /
• 1987

• 발명특허
• /
• v.12 no.4 s.134
• /
• pp.26-27
• /
• 1987

• Korea Trade Review
• /
• v.41 no.4
• /
• pp.21-40
• /
• 2016

This study mainly deals with a recent case held as to the formation of contract under the United Nations Convention on International Sale of Goods(CISG). In order to analyse the fact of the case and the justification of its holdings, it examines the rules on the formation of contract under the CISG, focusing on the requirements of offer and acceptance, the time when such offer and acceptance become effective, the issues on the battle of forms. In addition to these, it particularly investigates the rules on a delayed acceptance under the CISG. After looking into those rules, it criticizes the holdings and provides legal and practical advice to contracting parties who intend to conclude a contract under the CISG as a governing law. It finds that whose e-mail in the case amounts to an offer and an acceptance is depended upon the interpretation of intention of the parties expressed in their statement. According to such interpretation, even if a purchase order is requested by the seller for the formation of contract, a contract may be concluded by a simple statement which commits the buyer himself to purchase the seller's goods. This is particularly the case where such request is made only to clarify the buyer's intention to purchase them.

• Review of KIISC
• /
• v.26 no.5
• /
• pp.44-53
• /
• 2016

본 논문에서는 그동안 축적된 디지털 증거 관련 판례를 분석하여 디지털 증거가 법정에서 유효하게 사용될 수 있는 증거 능력 요건을 검토하였다. 법정에 제출된 디지털 증거가 증거능력을 인정받기 위해서는 다음과 같은 요건을 충족해야 한다. 첫 번째 요건으로서 적법하게 수집된 증거이어야 한다. 영장주의에 위반하거나, 압수수색절차에 피압수자의 참여권을 보장하지 않은 경우에는 증거의 증거능력이 인정되지 않는다. 또한 그동안 논란이 되었던 별건정보도 앞서 살펴본바와 같이 대법원이 제시한 요건을 충족해야 한다. 두 번째 요건으로는 법정에 제출된 디지털 증거의 진정성이 인정되어야 한다. 대법원은 디지털 증거의 진정성이 인정되기 위해서는 무결성과 동일성, 신뢰성이 인정되어야 한다고 판시한바 있다. 세 번째 요건으로 법정에 제출된 증거가 전문증거인 경우에는 당사자의 동의가 없는 한 전문법칙의 예외에 해당되어야 한다. 2016년 5월 형사소송법 제313조가 개정되기 전에는 법정에 제출된 디지털 증거를 진술자가 진정성립을 부인하는 경우, 해당 문서가 업무상 필요로 작성한 통상문서나 기타 특히 신용할 만한 정황에 의하여 작성된 문서에 해당되지 않는 한 증거능력을 인정받을 수 없었다. 그러나 형사소송법 제313조 제2항의 개정으로 인하여 이제는 진술자가 진정성립을 부인하는 경우에도 "과학적 분석결과에 기초한 디지털 포렌식 자료, 감정 등 객관적 방법"에 의해 성립의 진정을 인정받을 수 있다. 과학적 분석결과에 기초한 디지털 포렌식 자료, 감정 등 객관적 방법에 대한 구체적인 내용은 앞으로 판례를 통해 정립해 나아가야 할 것이다.

• Journal of the Korean Society for information Management
• /
• v.18 no.4
• /
• pp.127-142
• /
• 2001

It has been criticized that the right of reproduction and right of communication to the public in the Copyrigt Act of Korea, which was amended in the year of 2000 in line with new environments around digital networks, limited the limitation to author’s property right in private use and library exemption too much. Solving the problem above, this study analyzes comparatively WCT, Amended Proposal for a Directive on Copyright and Related Rights in the Information Society, Copyright Law of the United States of America, Copyright Amendment(Digital Agenda), and Copyright Act of Korea. Based on the results from related case analyses and a survey on how stakeholders view copyright issue, in addition, this study presents a reasonable way of limiting rights of reproduction and rights of communication to the public.

• Proceedings of the Korean Institute of Building Construction Conference
• /
• 2011.05a
• /
• pp.201-203
• /
• 2011

Because of a wide range of performance and diversity of project and uncertainty caused by complexity and a number of stakeholder, conflict occur necessarily in Urban generation including large-scale and many project which do the same time, for long time. So active conflict management which recognized risk before the fact and deal with conflict is necessarily needed. This paper based on the conflict cases related an urban regeneration. In those cases, we proposed the reason of the conflicts by analysis the most frequent combination of the conflicts and a case of conflict between each group.

• Annual Conference on Human and Language Technology
• /
• 2022.10a
• /
• pp.461-464
• /
• 2022

법원도서관이 발간하는 판례공보를 기반으로 판결문 자동요약을 위한 학습 데이터들이 구축되고 있다. 그런데 판결문 요약에서는 뉴스 요약과는 달리 추출요약과 생성요약 방식이 함께 사용되는 특수성이 있고, 이러한 특수성 때문에 현재 판결문 요약 데이터셋이 요약 프로그램의 성능 향상을 이끌지 못하고 있다고 생각된다. 따라서 법률가들이 판결문을 요약하는 방식을 반영하여, 추출요약 방식으로 작성된 판결요지와 생성요약 방식으로 작성된 판결요지를 분리해서 요약 데이터셋을 만들 필요가 있다. 추출요약과 생성요약에 관한 데이터셋을 따로 구축하기 위해서는 판례공보의 판결요지를 추출요약과 생성요약으로 분류하는 작업이 필요한데, 감성 분석에 사용되는 알고리즘이 판결요지의 분류 작업에 응용될 수 있다는 것을 실험 결과로 알 수 있었다.

• Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society
• /
• v.19 no.3
• /
• pp.180-185
• /
• 2018

The literature of unfair labeling and advertising(ULA) was reviewed, along with the requirement for establishing an obligation to compensate for damage(OCD) by it based on the Act on Fair Labeling and Advertising(FLAA). ULA covers cases of possible deception or misleading consumers and thereby undermining fair trade order, or making other business entities do so. FLAA regulates OCD by ULA, but the Civil Act should also be considered for its effective results since the Act regards ULA as unlawful and duty bound to make compensation for damages arising therein. In this context, the study analyzed qualitatively 17 supreme court precedents related to OCD by ULA among a total of 119 by advertising to find the characteristics of the judgemental principles. It is found that most principles came from FLAA and the Act focusing on the meaning of false or exaggerated advertising, which is one of the following five ULA types according to its standards of judgment: its requirement for fraudulent acts, the meaning of damage by it, the perspective of calculation of damages, the requirement of OCD, and the characteristics of claim for damages. A more effective policy is suggested based on FLAA and related research should be continually carried on.

• Korea Trade Review
• /
• v.42 no.1
• /
• pp.69-97
• /
• 2017

This study purpose to examine the importer's risks that may arise from origin investigation by Customs authorities. We have drawn the important factors affecting the application of FTA preferential tariffs and divided the stages from the conclusion of the contract for the importer to the undergoing origin investigation. In addition, we demonstrate empirically that the risks that arise in areas where importers are difficult to control exist. As a management method of the uncontrollable risk from the importer, we have provided the methods that the seller stipulated the seller's responsibility in the trade contract, prepared for situations in which no one was responsible, and formulated a friendly and cooperative supply chain. Even if the seller's liability is clarified in the contract for sale, the risk of the investigation into the origin of the imported goods is not completely eliminated. This is because, under the current agreement and system, there is no way for the customs authority of the contracting party of the FTA to claim compensation for damages incurred by importers due to breach of agreement such as not returning the result of the origin verification. Importers are subject to customs duties, but there may actually be situations in which no one is responsible for them.

• The Korean Society of Law and Medicine
• /
• v.4 no.2
• /
• pp.299-332
• /
• 2003