• Journal of the Korean Institute of Educational Facilities
• /
• v.16 no.2
• /
• pp.4-8
• /
• 2009

• Journal of the Korean Institute of Educational Facilities
• /
• v.23 no.6
• /
• pp.21-24
• /
• 2016

• Journal of the Korean Institute of Educational Facilities
• /
• v.23 no.5
• /
• pp.38-41
• /
• 2016

• Korean Journal of Air-Conditioning and Refrigeration Engineering
• /
• v.21 no.12
• /
• pp.678-687
• /
• 2009

The purpose of this study is to develop the assessment category, items, a detail standard for environmentally friendly evaluation on the school. and to analyze the plan to improve the level of certification criteria on the School's water resource and environmental pollution. The results of this study brings on promoted environmentally friendly appreciation, resource con servation, reduction of contaminant, accordance in and around building, etc. For this purpose, analysis of domestic and foreign environmental friendly architectural citation screening system-BREEAM (1991), LEED 2.0(2001) etc.-was preceded, and through interview, survey and forum with professional group, developed evaluation item was verified and reappraised. Developed evaluation item were composed of 40 schools about water resource and environmental pollution.

• Journal of the Korean Institute of Educational Facilities
• /
• v.16 no.5
• /
• pp.39-66
• /
• 2009

• Korean Journal of Air-Conditioning and Refrigeration Engineering
• /
• v.22 no.9
• /
• pp.589-598
• /
• 2010

The purpose of this study is to analyze 40 certified Education facilities and to find the way to acquire high scores and usefully method. As a result of analyzing the scores of 40 cases, We found the reasons why they had acquired low scores and high scores. Because the part of land use and transport is initial of the projects, this study focus on it and aim to pick out the items requiring improvement for the Education facilities. We expect to be helpful for the next design works through results of this study.

• The Magazine of the Society of Air-Conditioning and Refrigerating Engineers of Korea
• /
• v.39 no.9
• /
• pp.21-30
• /
• 2010

• Proceedings of the Korean Institute of Interior Design Conference
• /
• 2004.11a
• /
• pp.36-39
• /
• 2004

The purpose of this study is to extract the rage on exterior colors of Elementary schools in harmony with natural colors as the colors of sky and trees, of Which the colors is basically composing the natural environment. The theory of harmony in NCS relatively expressing the changed colors according to the color stimulation condition is the contrast of same color fit for the nature. NCS has a systematic open mind considering parts in the whole. The study suggests appropriate strategy for Eco-color scheme. The result shows that it's desirable to select YR Group in the elementray school of exterior color design, The Eco color planned by NCS is expected to clarify the interrelationship between children and environment. This practical use should be continuingly tried in the color design of interior for elementary schools.

• 월간 기계설비
• /
• s.235
• /
• pp.41-46
• /
• 2010

인천국제공항에서 불과 15분 거리며 비행거리 3시간 반 이내에 중국, 러시아, 일본 등을 빠르게 오갈 수 있는 곳. 바로 송도 국제도시이다. 지금 송도가 새롭게 변신하고 있다. 머지않아 송도는 한국을 동북아시아의 비즈니스 허브로 자리매김하는 데 핵심적인 역할을 할 것으로 예상된다. 송도는 송도국제업무단지 경제자유구역으로 지정된 세계 최초의 신(新) 지속 가능 개발 도시이다. 여러 종류의 주거용 건물과 상가 건물 및 학교뿐만 아니라 건강관리 시설과 쇼핑 외식 엔터테인먼트 시설까지 전세계에서 영감을 얻은 마스터플랜에 따라 최대의 시너지 효과를 내도록 설계되었다. 또한 건축물과 대중교통의 연계선 및 건물 설계상의 에너지 저감, 모든 종류의 녹지 공간 및 주거 공간의 효율적인 인프라 등 대규모 친환경 설계에 대한 새로운 기준이 되고 있다. 송도국제업무단지에서는 세계 최고 수준의 친환경 도시를 건설하기 위하여 대부분의 프로젝트에 LEED인증을 추진하고 있다. 본지는 인천 송도지구 개발의 기본 방향과 계획에 대해 살펴보고 특히 국제업무단지의 친환경 설계와 구체적인 설비기술에 대해 알아본다.

• The Journal of Sustainable Design and Educational Environment Research
• /
• v.10 no.2
• /
• pp.30-45
• /
• 2011

The purpose of this study is to verify the validity of items and to obtain basic information for spread of Korea Green Building Certification Criteria(KGBCC) by comparing items and school cases of KGBCC with those of LEED 2.1. LEED 2.1 is concentrating on 'Energy' and 'Indoor Air Quality' and KGBCC is relatively showing even distribution. And LEED 2.1 is not evaluate 'Ecology' that is important to us. And school cases of KGBCC and LEED 2.1 obtained similar scores by field or those of KGBCC obtained more scores. Domestic buildings need to ontain certification by KGBCC considering domestic situation. Also we need to lead activating of KGBCC through incentive programs.