• Title/Summary/Keyword: 치료계획시스템

Search Result 264, Processing Time 0.024 seconds

Implementation of rehabilitation treatment system using motion information discrimination technique (근육의 운동량 추정을 통한 재활치료 보조 시스템 구현)

  • Yang, Yoon-Jeong;Noh, Yun-Hong;Jeong, Do-Un
    • Proceedings of the Korean Institute of Information and Commucation Sciences Conference
    • /
    • 2017.05a
    • /
    • pp.505-506
    • /
    • 2017
  • 본 연구는 기존 재활치료전문가의 경험 기반 재활치료 훈련기법에서 진일보하여 보다 객관적인 데이터 기반의 효율적인 재활치료 지원이 가능한 보조시스템을 개발하고자 하였다. 근육의 움직임에 따른 활동전위를 측정하는 근전도와 실제 근육의 움직임에 따른 활동 상태를 가속도 및 자이로센서를 활용하여 측정함으로써 재활치료 시 보다 객관화된 데이터의 축적과 치료계획의 수립이 가능하다. 이를 위하여 본 연구에서는 재활치료 중 근전도 신호와 가속도, 자이로 센서를 결합한 재활운동효과 모니터링 시스템을 구현하였다. 그리고 구현된 시스템의 성능평가를 위해 피실험자 5명을 대상으로 다양한 재활치료 운동방법별 근전도 신호와 가속도 및 자이로센서 신호를 측정 및 분석하였다.

  • PDF

A Comprehensive Computer Program for Monitor Unit Calculation and Beam Data Management: Independent Verification of Radiation Treatment Planning Systems (방사선치료계획시스템의 독립적 검증을 위한 선량 계산 및 빔데이터 관리 프로그램)

  • Kim, Hee-Jung;Park, Yang-Kyun;Park, Jong-Min;Choi, Chang-Heon;Kim, Jung-In;Lee, Sang-Won;Oh, Heon-Jin;Lim, Chun-Il;Kim, Il-Han;Ye, Sung-Joon
    • Progress in Medical Physics
    • /
    • v.19 no.4
    • /
    • pp.231-240
    • /
    • 2008
  • We developed a user-friendly program to independently verify monitor units (MUs) calculated by radiation treatment planning systems (RTPS), as well as to manage beam database in clinic. The off-axis factor, beam hardening effect, inhomogeneity correction, and the different depth correction were incorporated into the program algorithm to improve the accuracy in calculated MUs. A beam database in the program was supposed to use measured data from routine quality assurance (QA) processes for timely update. To enhance user's convenience, a graphic user interface (GUI) was developed by using Visual Basic for Application. In order to evaluate the accuracy of the program for various treatment conditions, the MU comparisons were made for 213 cases of phantom and for 108 cases of 17 patients treated by 3D conformal radiation therapy. The MUs calculated by the program and calculated by the RTPS showed a fair agreement within ${\pm}3%$ for the phantom and ${\pm}5%$ for the patient, except for the cases of extreme inhomogeneity. By using Visual Basic for Application and Microsoft Excel worksheet interface, the program can automatically generate beam data book for clinical reference and the comparison template for the beam data management. The program developed in this study can be used to verify the accuracy of RTPS for various treatment conditions and thus can be used as a tool of routine RTPS QA, as well as independent MU checks. In addition, its beam database management interface can update beam data periodically and thus can be used to monitor multiple beam databases efficiently.

  • PDF

Dose Comparison of Treatment Plans Using Different Ir-192 Sources and Treatment Planning Systems for Intracavitary HDR Brachytherapy (고선량률 강내 근접치료에 사용되는 Ir-192 선원과 치료계획 시스템간의 계산선량 비교)

  • Park, Dong-Wook;Kim, Young-Seok;Park, Sung-Ho;Choi, Eun-Kyung;Kim, Jong-Hoon;Lee, Sang-Wook;Song, Si-Yeol;Ahn, Seung-Do;Noh, Young-Joo
    • Progress in Medical Physics
    • /
    • v.20 no.1
    • /
    • pp.1-6
    • /
    • 2009
  • For HDR intracavitary brachytherapy with ovoids and a tandem, we compared the dose discrepancy of treatment plans using two different Ir-192 sources (microSelectron, Varian) and generated on two different treatment planning systems (PLATO, BrachyVision). The treatment plans of ten patient treated from Oct. 2007 to Jan. 2008 were selected for these comparisons. For the comparison of dose calculation using different sources, the average discrepancies were $-0.91{\pm}0.09%$, $-0.27{\pm}0.07%$, $0.22{\pm}0.39%$, and $0.88{\pm}0.37%$ in total treatment time and at B-point and ICRU bladder and rectum reference point, respectively. Comparing the two systems, the average dose discrepancies between treatment planning programs were $-0.22{\pm}0.42%$, $-0.25{\pm}0.29%$, $-0.23{\pm}0.63%$, and $-0.17{\pm}0.76%$, and the average dose discrepancies between positioning methods (PLATO with film and BrachyVision with digitial image) were $-0.61{\pm}0.59%$, $-0.77{\pm}0.45%$, $-0.72{\pm}1.70%$, and $0.35{\pm}2.82%$ at A-point, B-point, and ICRU bladder and rectum reference points, respectively. The rectal dose discrepancies between two systems were reached 5.87%. The difference in the dwell position expected by each TPS are mainly affected by the differences in the positioning method in TPSs and have an effect on dose calculations of rectal and bladder located in AP direction.

  • PDF

Evaluation of Planning Dose Accuracy in Case of Radiation Treatment on Inhomogeneous Organ Structure (불균질부 방사선치료 시 계획 선량의 정확성 평가)

  • Kim, Chan Yong;Lee, Jae Hee;Kwak, Yong Kook;Ha, Min Yong
    • The Journal of Korean Society for Radiation Therapy
    • /
    • v.25 no.2
    • /
    • pp.137-143
    • /
    • 2013
  • Purpose: We are to find out the difference of calculated dose of treatment planning system (TPS) and measured dose in case of inhomogeneous organ structure. Materials and Methods: Inhomogeneous phantom is made with solid water phantom and cork plate. CT image of inhomogeneous phantom is acquired. Treatment plan is made with TPS (Pinnacle3 9.2. Royal Philips Electronics, Netherlands) and calculated dose of point of interest is acquired. Treatment plan was delivered in the inhomogeneous phantom by ARTISTE (Siemens AG, Germany) measured dose of each point of interest is obtained with Gafchromic EBT2 film (International Specialty Products, US) in the gap between solid water phantom or cork plate. To simulate lung cancer radiation treatment, artificial tumor target of paraffin is inserted in the cork volume of inhomogeneous phantom. Calculated dose and measured dose are acquired as above. Results: In case of inhomogeneous phantom experiment, dose difference of calculated dose and measured dose is about -8.5% at solid water phantom-cork gap and about -7% lower in measured dose at cork-solid water phantom gap. In case of inhomogeneous phantom inserted paraffin target experiment, dose difference is about 5% lower in measured dose at cork-paraffin gap. There is no significant difference at same material gap in both experiments. Conclusion: Radiation dose at the gap between two organs with different electron density is significantly lower than calculated dose with TPS. Therefore, we must be aware of dose calculation error in TPS and great care is suggested in case of radiation treatment planning on inhomogeneous organ structure.

  • PDF

A study on the effect of collimator angle on PAN-Pelvis volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) including junction (접합부를 포함한 PAN-전골반암 VMAT 치료 계획 시 콜리메이터 각도의 영향에 관한 고찰)

  • Kim, Hyeon Yeong;Chang, Nam Jun;Jung, Hae Youn;Jeong, Yun Ju;Won, Hui Su;Seok, Jin Yong
    • The Journal of Korean Society for Radiation Therapy
    • /
    • v.32
    • /
    • pp.61-71
    • /
    • 2020
  • Purpose: To investigate the effect of collimator angle on plan quality of PAN-Pelvis Multi-isocenter VMAT plan, dose reproducibility at the junction and impact on set-up error at the junction. Material and method: 10 adult patients with whole pelvis cancer including PAN were selected for the study. Using Trubeam STx equipped with HD MLC, we changed the collimator angle to 20°, 30°, and 45° except 10° which was the default collimator angle in the Eclipse(version 13.7) and all other treatment conditions were set to be the same for each patient and four plans were established also. To evaluate these plans, PTV coverage, coverage index(CVI) and homogeneity index (HI) were compared and clinical indicators for each treatment sites in normal tissues were analyzed. To evaluate dose reproducibility at the junction, the absolute dose was measured using a Falmer type ionization chamber and dose changes at the junction were evaluated by moving the position of the isocenter in and out 1~3mm and setting up the virtual volume at the junction. Result: CVI mean value was PTV-45 0.985±0.004, PTV-55 0.998±0.003 at 45° and HI mean value was PTV-45 1.140±0.074, and PTV-55 1.031±0.074 at 45° which were closest to 1. V20Gy of the kidneys decreased by 9.66% and average dose of bladder and V30 decreased by 1.88% and 2.16% at 45° compared to 10° for the critical organs. The dose value at the junction of the plan and the actual measured were within 0.3% and within tolerance. At the junction, due to set-up error the maximum dose increased to 14.56%, 9.88%, 8.03%, and 7.05%, at 10°, 20°, 30°, 45°, and the minimum dose decreased to 13.18%, 10.91%, 8.42%, and 4.53%, at 10°, 20°, 30°, 45° Conclusion: In terms of CVI, HI of PTV and critical organ protection, overall improved values were shown as the collimator angle increased. The impact on set-up error at the junction by collimator angle decreased as the angle increased and it will help improve the anxiety about the set up error. In conclusion, the collimator angle should be recognized as a factor that can affect the quality of the multi-isocenter VMAT plan and the dose at the junction, and be careful in setting the collimator angle in the treatment plan.

Assessment of Dosimetric Leaf Gap According to Measuring Active Volume of Detector (검출기 측정 용적에 따른 Dosimetric Leaf Gap 변화와 정확성 검증에 대한 연구)

  • Dae-Hyun, Kim
    • Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology
    • /
    • v.16 no.7
    • /
    • pp.863-870
    • /
    • 2022
  • DLG (Dosimetric Leaf Gap) and transmission factor are important parameters of MLC modeling in treatment planning system. In this study, DLG and transmission factor of HD-MLC were measured using detector with different measuring volumes, and the accuracy of the treatment plans was evaluated according to the DLG values. DLG was measured using the dynamic sweeping gap method with Semiflux3D and MicroDiamond detectors. Then, 10 radiation treatment plans were generated to optimize the DLG value and compared with the measurement results. Photon energies 6, 8, 10 MV, the DLG measured by Semiflux3D were 0.76, 0.83, and 0.85 mm, and DLG measured by MicroDiamond were 0.78, 0.86, and 0.9 mm. All plans were measured by portal dosimetry and analyzed using Gamma Evaluation. In the 6 MV photon beams, the average gamma passing rate were 94.3% and 98.4% for DLG 0.78 mm and 1.15 mm. In the 10 MV photon beam, the average gamma passing rate were 91.2% and 97.6% for DLG 0.9 mm and 1.25 mm. HD-MLC needs accurate modeling in the treatment planning system. DLG could be used measured data using small volume detector. However, for better radiation therapy, DLG should be optimized at the commissioning stage of LINAC.

Implementation and Evaluation of the Electron Arc Plan on a Commercial Treatment Planning System with a Pencil Beam Algorithm (Pencil Beam 알고리즘 기반의 상용 치료계획 시스템을 이용한 전자선 회전 치료 계획의 구현 및 정확도 평가)

  • Kang, Sei-Kwon;Park, So-Ah;Hwang, Tae-Jin;Cheong, Kwang-Ho;Lee, Me-Yeon;Kim, Kyoung-Ju;Oh, Do-Hoon;Bae, Hoon-Sik
    • Progress in Medical Physics
    • /
    • v.21 no.3
    • /
    • pp.304-310
    • /
    • 2010
  • Less execution of the electron arc treatment could in large part be attributed to the lack of an adequate planning system. Unlike most linear accelerators providing the electron arc mode, no commercial planning systems for the electron arc plan are available at this time. In this work, with the expectation that an easily accessible planning system could promote electron arc therapy, a commercial planning system was commissioned and evaluated for the electron arc plan. For the electron arc plan with use of a Varian 21-EX, Pinnacle3 (ver. 7.4f), with an electron pencil beam algorithm, was commissioned in which the arc consisted of multiple static fields with a fixed beam opening. Film dosimetry and point measurements were executed for the evaluation of the computation. Beam modeling was not satisfactory with the calculation of lateral profiles. Contrary to good agreement within 1% of the calculated and measured depth profiles, the calculated lateral profiles showed underestimation compared with measurements, such that the distance-to-agreement (DTA) was 5.1 mm at a 50% dose level for 6 MeV and 6.7 mm for 12 MeV with similar results for the measured depths. Point and film measurements for the humanoid phantom revealed that the delivered dose was more than the calculation by approximately 10%. The electron arc plan, based on the pencil beam algorithm, provides qualitative information for the dose distribution. Dose verification before the treatment should be mandatory.

Multiagent-based Autonomic Planning and Plan Execution (다중 에이전트 기반의 자율적 계획수립과 계획실행)

  • Lee, Seon-A;Hwang, Gyeong-Sun;Lee, Geon-Myeong
    • Proceedings of the Korean Institute of Intelligent Systems Conference
    • /
    • 2007.11a
    • /
    • pp.407-410
    • /
    • 2007
  • 자율컴퓨팅은 관리자나 사용자의 개입없이 시스템이나 서비스가 원활하게 동작되는 환경으로 구조조정, 최적화, 치료, 방어 등을 위한 여러가지 기술이 복합적으로 요구된다. 태스크를 자율적으로 완수하고 최적으로 수행하기위한 자율적 계획수립 및 계획실행은 자율컴퓨팅에서 필요한 요소기술이다. 이 논문에서는 목표의 실패없는 수행을 위한 여러 잠재적인 실행경로를 포함하는 강건한 계획수립과 다중 에이전트 구조를 이용하여 가용한 자원에 대한 전반적인 고려와 함께 실행시점의 상황을 반영하여 최적의 실행경로에 따라 계획을 실행하게 하는 방법을 제안한다.

  • PDF

Integration of a Radiotherapy Robot System (방사선 로봇 시스템 통합)

  • Choi, You-Rak;Jeong, Gyoeng-Min;Choi, Young-Su
    • Proceedings of the Korea Information Processing Society Conference
    • /
    • 2017.04a
    • /
    • pp.1060-1061
    • /
    • 2017
  • 방사선 로봇 시스템은 X-Ray를 이용하는 로봇 기반 자동 치료 시스템으로 방사선 치료계획 시스템, 방사선가속기, 방사선 치료 로봇, 호홉 추적 시스템, 스마트베드로 구성된다. X-Ray를 이용하는 치료 시스템인 관계로 안정적인 제어가 요구되며, 환자의 호흡에 의한 병소 위치 변위 발생에도 X-Ray를 병소에 정확하게 정량 조사해야한다. 본 논문에서는 방사선 로봇 시스템을 구성하는 서브시스템 간의 데이터 송수신 동기화와 시스템 안정성 확보, 그리고 시스템 통합을 위한 문서 작업을 획기적으로 줄이면서 시스템 통합을 단시간에 수행한 과정에 대하여 기술한다.

The Clinical Implementation of 2D Dose Distribution QA System for the Patient Specific Respiratory-gated Radiotherapy (호흡동조 방사선치료의 2차원 선량 분포 정도관리를 위한 4D 정도관리 시스템 개발)

  • Kim, Jin-Sung;Shin, Eun-Hyuk;Shin, Jung-Suk;Ju, Sang-Gyu;Han, Young-Yih;Park, Hee-Chul;Choi, Doo-Ho
    • Progress in Medical Physics
    • /
    • v.21 no.2
    • /
    • pp.127-136
    • /
    • 2010
  • Emerging technologies such as four-dimensional computed tomography (4D CT) is expected to allow clinicians to accurately model interfractional motion and to quantitatively estimate internal target volumes (ITVs) for radiation therapy involving moving targets. A need exists for a 4D radiation therapy quality assurance (QA) device that can incorporate and analyze the patient specific intrafractional motion as it relate to dose delivery and respiratory gating. We built a 4D RT prototype device and analyzed the patient-specific 4D radiation therapy QA for 2D dose distributions successfully. With more improvements, the 4D RT QA prototype device could be an integral part of a 4D RT decision process to confirm the dose delivery.