• Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology
• /
• v.7 no.3
• /
• pp.233-238
• /
• 2013

Chest lateral decubitus radiation exposure PA be carried out in general, but emergency patient or the patient's discomfort in the body examination had a lot of inconvenience. In this study, we compared AP and PA image quality, patient safety, and analysis of the examination effectiveness between the two tests was to evaluate the usefulness. Pleurisy or pneumothorax in patients with suspected or diagnosed chest lateral decubitus radiation exposure 30 consecutive patients (male 20 patients, 10 females) were included in the study. Image quality evaluation method microstructure of lung, wide areas of diagnosis, a clear air-fluid interface, the patient rotate, cardiac shadow and sharp diaphragmatic was based on Department of Radiology specialist, division of pulmonology resident blind test was evaluated by four people. Chest decubitus by radiation exposure the AP and PA position examination the usefulness of comparative analysis Image quality in the AP and PA, whereas there was no significant difference in attitude, Stability of the patient and Radiation's examination efficiency AP position compared to the position of PA scores were higher. PA position does not require a examination may be of AP position in a position to suggest that.

• Journal of radiological science and technology
• /
• v.34 no.4
• /
• pp.263-269
• /
• 2011

Since the spine radiography were explained differently at every several hospitals and textbooks. the technique has not been accurately defined and interfered each other. We would like to define the most appropriate positioning for clinical cases, and reference books, by comparing scoliotic angle and lordotic angle. From Mar 2009 to Sep 2011, 85 patient cases were studied, who had not been undergone surgical treatment among spondylopathy patients. Scoliotic angle and lordotic angle were measured, using Cobb's method. We analyzed statistically using t-test(SPSS 18), and evaluated spine general radiography position. Moreover, we researched on the actual condition at 10 university hospitals in Seoul. The results of scoliotic angle measurement, the value at erect position showed 20.98% higher than supine position, and it has statistical significance (p<.01). In lordotic angle measurement, the value at neutral holding position represented 29.3% higher than supine position, and it also has statistical significance(p<.01). The results of clinical survey, supine posine(70.0%) took much higher possession than erect position(30.0%). In conclusion, compare to supine position, erect position shows increased scoliotic and lordotic angle. It was agreed with the importance of clinical erect position radiography, which gravity affects. So clinical radiologist must recognize the difference, and conduct an accurate study.