• Korean journal of communication and information
• /
• v.66
• /
• pp.242-272
• /
• 2014

This study examines why follow-up investigative programs about the sinking of the Cheonan Patrol Combat Corvette(ROKS Cheonan) have not been produced, despite much speculation surrounding the cause of the sinking since November 2010, when KBS investigative program, In-Depth 60 Minutes which had covered the incident was aired. We have uncovered four reasons through a series of in-depth interviews with producers and reporters, as follows. First, Korean military authorities monopolized relevant information, while the producers could not prove or confirm the validity of the findings of the JIG(Joint Civilian-Military Investigation Group)'s report because the facts had been revealed partially and selectively by the authorities and the press' scientific investigation were rejected by the authorities. Second, the crew of In-Depth 60 Minutes was subjected to severe disciplinary action by the Korea Communications Commission. This caused a chilling effect, - it broke the producers' resolve to further explore the reason behind the sinking. Furthermore, the screening of the investigative documentary, Project Cheonan Ship was cancelled without prior notice, presumably by the power of the State and markets. Third, the reorganization and shake-up of personnel by broadcasting stations' presidents appointed by the power of the State crushed the spirit of PD Journalism. Finally, the "red purge" factions stigmatized by the political or military, or the mainstream press, caused the producers or broadcasters to engage in self-censorship. The idea has been used in Korea as a smoke screen to deflect public attention. Nevertheless, the producers hope to shed light on the Cheonan sinking incident and to prove reasonable doubts by pursuing follow-up investigations.

• 도로교통
• /
• s.102
• /
• pp.20-32
• /
• 2005

• The monthly packaging world
• /
• s.35
• /
• pp.100-103
• /
• 1996

• Proceedings of the Korean Quaternary Association Conference
• /
• 2005.06a
• /
• pp.31-36
• /
• 2005

• Journal of the Korean Institute of Educational Facilities
• /
• v.11 no.1
• /
• pp.102-113
• /
• 2004

• 한국사회복지학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 2000.04a
• /
• pp.313-336
• /
• 2000

• Proceedings of the Korea Air Pollution Research Association Conference
• /
• 1998.10a
• /
• pp.377-378
• /
• 1998

• Proceedings of the Korea Air Pollution Research Association Conference
• /
• 2000.11a
• /
• pp.69-70
• /
• 2000

오늘날 환경보전이 중요한 관심사가 되면서, 환경파괴를 막고 환경의 질을 쾌적하게 유지하고자 하는 운동이 범 지구적으로 일어나고 있다. 본 연구는 천안시의 환경보전을 위한 노력의 일환으로서, 현재 신도시 건설과 고속철도 건설 등의 도시화와 산업화로 대기질의 특성분석이 필요한 상황이다. 이에 따라 쾌적한 대기질을 유지하기 위한 문제가 현안문제로 등장하고 있다. 본 연구에서는 1997년부터 2000년 하반기까지 약 4년에 걸쳐 각 연도별 4회의 대기오염도를 측정하여 대기오염실태 및 문제점을 파악하고, 문제점을 도출하여 개선, 장래 대기오염방지대책을 마련하고 보다 깨끗하고 쾌적한 대기질을 유지하는데 도움을 주고자 한다. (중략)

• Journal of Korean Society of Transportation
• /
• v.17 no.1
• /
• pp.223-233
• /
• 1999

본 연구는 호남고속철도 계획에서 검토되어야 할 쟁점들을 다룬다. 이 연구에서는 프랑스의 TGV 노선망을 검토하고, 호남고속철도 기점 역으로서 청주역과 천안역을 비교·평가하며, 그밖에 계획의 주요 쟁점을 정리하는 데 중점을 두고 있다. 연구결과를 요약하면 다음과 같다. 우선 프랑스의 TGV 경험과 IMF 체제라는 상황에 비추어 호남고속철도 계획은 경부고속철도와 기존 철도의 활용이라는 관점에서 출발해야 한다. 둘째, 노선대안을 비교·분석한 결과 대안 I (청주기점역)이 대안 II(천안기점역)에 비해 모든 평가항목에서 바람직한 것으로 판단된다. 셋째, 노선대안 외의 쟁점으로는 계획과정의 투명성 확보, 21세기 고속철도의 위상정립, 기존철도의 개량계획과의 조화, 수송의 효율성과 지역개발 간의 갈등 등이 있으며, 이에 대한 지속적인 논의가 필요하다.

• The Korean Journal of Applied Statistics
• /
• v.30 no.5
• /
• pp.719-731
• /
• 2017

In September 2010, the Korea government increased the speed limit on the Gyeongbu Expressway (Cheonan IC.-Yangjae IC) from 100 to 110 km per hour. This paper considers ARIMA-Intervention model to analyze the effects of the speed limit change on the incidences of traffic accidents and injuries. In addition, in order to investigate the effects more clearly, we also analyze the difference between the two lines of Cheonan IC-Yangjae IC and Busan IC-Cheonan IC. As a result, we observe that the numbers of accidents and injuries have increased after the speed limit change. The increases are strikingly distinctive in comparison to other lines (Busan IC-Cheonan IC) where there have been no changes in the maximum speed limit.