• Title/Summary/Keyword: 책임감리

Search Result 64, Processing Time 0.022 seconds

Improvement Strategies of Supervision Tasks through Analysis of Overseas Construction Supervision Systems (해외 건설공사 감리체계 분석을 통한 감리업무 개선 방안)

  • Jung, Yeon-Jong;Kim, Kyoung-Min
    • Journal of the Korea Institute of Building Construction
    • /
    • v.24 no.3
    • /
    • pp.371-380
    • /
    • 2024
  • This study investigated and analyzed overseas construction supervision systems to propose improvements for domestic supervision practices. The findings indicate a need for strengthening the role and responsibility of the ordering organization, sharing the workload and reducing the burden on supervisors, establishing a supervision work evaluation system. By implementing these recommendations, it is anticipated that the quality and effectiveness of construction supervision can be significantly enhanced.

An Analysis of Perceptions by Road Construction Engineers on ICEC Framework at the Time of System Transition, from Responsibility Supervision to Construction Management(I) - Main Focus on ICEC Framework - (책임감리가 건설사업관리(CM)로 전환시 도입된 역량지수(ICEC)에 대한 도로건설기술자들의 인식 분석(I) - 역량지수 등급 체계를 중심으로 -)

  • Park, Hyo-Sung;Kim, Nak-Seok
    • KSCE Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering Research
    • /
    • v.35 no.5
    • /
    • pp.1147-1156
    • /
    • 2015
  • The result of responsibility supervision system which has been enforced for the last twenty (20) years since January, 1994 is evaluated, and keeps an eye out the process of unification and absorption of the system into the construction management (CM). As a baseline data for this study, the grade framework of construction engineer's ICEC introduced with CM is summarized. In this manuscript, the questionaire survey for CM and ICEC was conducted toward the target group of road field construction engineers and analyzed the outcome of the respondents' answers. 50% of the respondents have answered positively for the question about converting responsibility supervision to CM. 48% of the respondents from construction works field have answered positively for converting responsibility supervision system to CM while 38% of the respondents from engineers of supervision field have answered positively, less positive than the answers from works field engineers. 46% of overall respondents have answered, however, to maintain the present system of 40%, 40% and 20% on the survey to the question asking the opinion on the ways of calculating ICEC to use the rates : 40% of career, 40% of qualification and 20% of academic achievements. However, it appeared that engineers who have comparative advantages with academic achievements and career, and engineers with lower grade qualification demanded higher rate for career.