• Title/Summary/Keyword: 책무성

Search Result 208, Processing Time 0.026 seconds

대학교육에서의 질 평가에 대한 새로운 관심

  • Gang, Gyeong-Seok
    • 대학교육
    • /
    • s.87
    • /
    • pp.52-65
    • /
    • 1997
  • 대학교육의 질 향상과 책무성 제고의 목적을 지닌 외부평가(EQA)를 운영하는 것은 두 극단을 항해하는 것과 같다. 평가가 발전만을 목적으로 하면 외부로부터의 책무성 요구라는 암벽에 부딪쳐 침몰하게 되고, 책무성이 지나치게 강조되면 발전이 방해받아 소용돌이 속으로 사라지게 될 것이다.

  • PDF

A Study on Variables Affecting Kindergarten Teachers' Adaptation to the Teaching Profession : Focused on Background Variables, Development Stage, and Perception of Accountability (유아교사의 교직적응에 영향을 미치는 제 변인에 대한 연구: 배경변인, 발달단계, 책무성 인식을 중심으로)

  • Kim, Sun Nam;Choi, Hye Jin
    • Korean Journal of Childcare and Education
    • /
    • v.8 no.4
    • /
    • pp.53-76
    • /
    • 2012
  • The purpose of this study was to find out the effect of background variables, development stage, and perception of accountability on kindergarten teachers' adaptation to the teaching profession. The researchers surveyed 224 teachers in public and private kindergarten. The results of the study are as follows: First, in terms of age, the older they were, the better teachers adjusted to the teaching profession. As for their teaching career, the more teaching experience they had, the better teachers adapted to the teaching profession, but there were no significant differences between 6-10 years and more than 11 years. As to the level of education, four-year college graduates or graduate school graduates adjusted better than two-year college graduates. Second, teachers in the Capability Development Stage and Growth-Enthusiasm Stage showed a higher degree of adaptation than those in the Entrance-Acceptance Stage. Finally, the higher perception of accountability they have, the better teachers could adapt to the teaching profession. Among the categories of accountability, the professional accountability affected most highly the teachers' adaptation to the teaching profession.

The Comparative Analysis of PISA Reading Domain and AASL Standards for the 21st-Century Learner (국제 학업성취도 평가(PISA)의 독서영역과 AASL의 21세기 학습자 기준 비교에 관한 연구)

  • Lee, Byeong-Ki
    • Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society
    • /
    • v.43 no.3
    • /
    • pp.193-216
    • /
    • 2012
  • In recent years, strengthening educational accountability of school as the public institutions has been emphasized. Thus, most countries perform national student assessments and programme for international student assessment(PISA) in order to prove the educational accountability. The school library supported by the educational institutions are no exception, school library has demanding the educational accountability. The purpose of this study was to compare the reading domain of PISA and standards for the 21st-century learner of AASL, it is to investigate that the school library contributes to PISA achievement. In this study were analyzed domain of PISA 2009 reading literacy and questionnaires. The results, PISA questionnaire contains a lot of elements in the school library and PISA is consistent with standards for the 21st-century learner of AASL.

Efficiency and Public Accountability in Contracting Out: A Comparative Analysis of U.S. Bus Systems (민간위탁에 있어 효율성과 공적책무성: 미국버스시스템의 비교분석)

  • 모창환
    • Proceedings of the KOR-KST Conference
    • /
    • 2002.02a
    • /
    • pp.3-13
    • /
    • 2002
  • 미국의 전체 버스시스템의 횡단면자료를 가지고 민간위탁운영과 정부직영을 비교 분석한 결과, 민간위탁운영과 정부직영의 버스서비스 공급에 있어 효과성과 공적책무성 측면에서 중요한 차이점이 있는 것으로 분석되었다. 효율성 비교분석에서는 효율성 측정을 위해 어떤 지표를 사용하느냐에 따라 민간위탁과 정부직영중 어느 버스운영시스템이 더 효율적인지에 대해 전혀 다른 결과를 보였다. 즉 효율성은 어느 운영시스템이 더 효율적이라고 단정할 수 없었다. 효과성분석에서는 정부직영이 민간위탁보다 더욱 효과적인 것으로 분석되었다. 공적책무성 분석에서는 민간위탁운영은 공공성의 소극적지표인 공적책무성을 정부직영에 비해 감소시키는 것으로 분석되었다.

  • PDF

An Empirical Study on Public Value Conflict in Cultural Administration: Comparison and Analysis Based on Administrators, Planners, and Artists (문화행정의 공공성 가치충돌에 관한 실증연구 - 행정인, 기획인, 예술인 집단 비교분석 -)

  • Jang, Seok Ryu
    • Korean Association of Arts Management
    • /
    • no.56
    • /
    • pp.39-87
    • /
    • 2020
  • This study empirically analyzed the value conflicts of cultural administration based on the needs of axiological discussions and the differences in intersubjectivity among the cultural administration groups and the contradicting attributes of culture and administration. The study classified the stakeholders into administrative staff, planners, and artists to compare their value priorities of publicness in cultural administration. A classification analysis was also conducted based on the normative by each group and the value distribution on a 2×2 value matrix between autonomy and accountability and fairness and efficiency. Based on the results of the quantitative study, the awareness of the relationships among the groups and cause and effects of value conflicts was analyzed through in-depth interviews. Thus, the study aimed to identify the directions for value distribution wherein the values of administration and culture can coexist and determine the implications of expanding this mutual understanding. The results revealed that in the conflict between autonomy and accountability, all groups had a greater awareness of accountability. In terms of normative aspects, it was possible to see a normative value line with an emphasis on autonomy, rather than on accountability from the lower stages on the budget hierarchy (administrators at the top, followed by planners and artists). In the conflict between autonomy and accountability, the size of dissonance between appropriateness and reality was the largest among the groups in the lower stages of the budget hierarchy, and became larger along the order of administrators, planners, and artists. In the conflict between efficiency and fairness, all groups had a greater awareness of efficiency. In terms of fairness in normative aspects, emphasis was placed on was artists, administrators, and planners, in that order. The size of dissonance between efficiency and fairness by groups became larger along the order of budget hierarchy-administrators, planners, and artists. Based on the results, the study compared and analyzed the 2×2 value matrix between the normative and actualities by groups. The normative value distribution emphasized Type 1 (accountability x fairness) as seeking communitarianism values through culture and Type 2 (autonomy x fairness) as seeking balanced values of cultural freedom of individualsonabalance. However, in actualities, although the communitarianism values of Type 1 were considered important, there were no distributions to the liberal values of Type 2, rather to the economic values of culture from Type 4 (accountability x efficiency). In summary, the Korean cultural administration isunderapressureof value distribution to emphasize the communitarianism and economic rather than liberal values, through bureaucratic control in actualities compared with the normative. This study will have significant implications on value distribution decision-making by groups and political implementations within the purview of cultural administration.

The Strategic Management of Government R&D Programs and the Balanced Scorecard (정부연구개발사업 전략관리를 위한 균형성과표 활용방안)

  • Lee, Jae-Keun
    • Proceedings of the Korean Operations and Management Science Society Conference
    • /
    • 2005.10a
    • /
    • pp.217-220
    • /
    • 2005
  • 과학기술이 국가경쟁력에서 차지하는 비중이 높아지면서, 국가 차원에서 과학기술역량의 확충을 위한 다양한 정책적 노력이 경주되고 있으며, 그 일환으로 정부연구개발사업과 관련된 예산도 지속적으로 증가하여 왔다. 이와 함께 최근 들어 공공부분에 책무성(accountability)에 대한 논의와 함께 성과주의 제도의 적극적인 도입이 검토되고 있다. 특히 다양한 특성을 가진 많은 정부사업들이 적절하게 추진되고 있는지 그 성과를 측정하고 관리하는 것은 책무성의 이행이라는 측면에서 상당히 중요하다. 이에 따라 성과를 보다 명확히 측정할 수 있는 도구의 필요성과 함께 균형성과표(Balanced Scorecard: BSC)가 새롭게 조명을 받고 있다. 본 연구에서는 BSC의 기본모형을 확장하여 정부연구개발사업에 적용해 보고자 한다.

  • PDF