• Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society
• /
• v.13 no.3
• /
• pp.1122-1128
• /
• 2012

This study was aimed at identifying the factors of creative ability influencing problem-solving skills for University students majoring in nursing science. A descriptive study was conducted with a sample of 248 students enrolled in a 4-year undergraduate academic program for nursing in one University located in an urban area of Korea. This study used: (a) 25 items of Process Behavior Survey, and (b) 35 items of the Integrative Creativity Scale. The data were collected from Nov. 8th toward Nov. 26th, 2010; the research was conducted through voluntary participation after an explanation about the research. The data were also analyzed with SPSS 18.0 program, using Pearson correlation and stepwise multiple regression methods. Mean score of the level of problem-solving process was 3.62(${\pm}.448$). Problem-solving process was significantly related to creative ability(p<.01). Problem-solving process was significantly influenced by flexibility and elaboration in account for 42.4%. These results imply that in order to foster problem-solving ability, nursing professors need to develop nursing students' creative ability and its factors.

• Proceedings of the Korea Technology Innovation Society Conference
• /
• 1999.11c
• /
• pp.379-398
• /
• 1999

본 연구는 창의적 문제해결과정에 대한 개념을 신제품 개발 프로젝트에 적용하여 문제해결 관점에서의 신제품개발 성과 모델을 제시하고 있다. 연구개발 프로젝트 팀과 관련한 연구논문들이 그 동안 많이 있었으며, 각각의 이론들은 상호 이질적이고 다른 관점을 취해 연구자와 실무자들에게 다소의 혼란을 야기하여 왔다. 대표적으로 살펴보면 합리적 계획, 의사소통 망, 훈련된 문제해결의 세 개의 차원으로 나누어진다. 이러한 이유로 국내외 학자들은 통합모델을 제시하려고 노력하여 왔다. 그러나 그러한 접근은 신제품 개발의 본질적 성격을 반영하는 새로운 깊이 있는 차원으로서의 모델 통합이 아니라 단순히 영향 요인들의 나열 또는 종합하는 특징을 지니고 있다. 본 연구는 신제품 개발 R&D 팀이 본질적으로 문제해결 집단이라는 전제하에 창의적 문제해결을 위한 구성원들의 문제해결 몰입과 해결안의 질적 수준의 향상을 높이기 위하여 R&D 팀의 인지적 다양성과 R&D팀의 위상과 관련하여 R&D 환경 성숙도라는 새로운 변수를 추가하였다. 여기서 제시하는 창의적 문제해결과정으로서의 R&D팀 성과와 관련된 연구모델은 본질적인 것을 다루면서 단순화 된 모델로서 그 동안 여러 관점에서 다루어져 온 개념들을 통합할 뿐만 아니라, 새로운 차원에서 R&D 성과를 높이는데 개념으로 많은 도움을 줄 것이다.

• Communications of Mathematical Education
• /
• v.17
• /
• pp.159-168
• /
• 2003

본 연구는 창의적 수학문제해결력의 검사도구의 요소들을 제시하고 있다. 수학적 창의성을 과정적 관점에서 출발하여 수학적 창의성을 창의적 수학문제제해결과 동일시하고 그에 따른 검사도구의 기본요소들을 Polya의 문제해결기법에서 나타나는 메타인지적 전략과 수학적 마인드를 검사하는 요소들로 구성하였다.

• Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship
• /
• v.12 no.2
• /
• pp.65-76
• /
• 2017

The purpose of this study is to promote the activation of creative problem - solving education in Korea through the case of countries leading education for creative problem solving in order to overcome the limitation of creative problem solving education in Korea. Based on 5 success factors by our cases of United States, Singapore, and Dublin City University in Ireland, we focused on the cases and extracted five key characteristics of creative problem solving education. The university should be able to provide various information gathering and theoretical knowledge for problem definition as well as continuing guidance and mentoring, rather than one-time teaching, in the form of teaching-student cooperative learning paradigm. Second, the class should be a team - based learning team which is a key factor in overseas universities' policy, so as to be able to identify differentiated, new ideas and creative problem solving methods based on knowledge and experience sharing. The creative problem solving method derived from education could be able to collect, organize, and apply to the field continuously and comprehensively about the learning process of the individual. Evaluation of curriculum should be based on characteristics of school and characteristics of students. The results of creative problem-solving education should be evaluated in order to continuously develop and create value in addition to the outcomes of the class. Therefore, it is necessary to develop an evaluation process for each university. The university should try to make creative problem solving education create value through specialization of university. Based on this, we propose a creative problem solving education framework.

• Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education
• /
• v.18 no.2
• /
• pp.149-160
• /
• 1998

The purpose of this study was to analyze the 6th national secondary science curriculum and classroom practices to collect the basic data for developing secondary science program focusing on creative problem-solving ability. The creative problem-solving ability was conceptualized as an active process of producing new solutions to problems and consisted of five components: general knowledge, domain-specific knowledge, motivation, divergent thinking and critical thinking. The research questions were generated as follows: (1) Whether creative problem-solving elements-domain specific knowledge(declarative knowledge and inquiry methods) were included or not in the 6th secondary science curriculum, textbooks and teacher's guide? If so, how are they represented? (2) Whether the teachers tried to enhance divergent and critical thinking of their students. Through content analyses, observations and interviews, these research questions were answered as follows: (1) Inquiry methods, which are important to develop creative problem-solving abilities in science, were underestimated in comparison with declarative knowledge. In other words. inquiry methods were regarded only as tools to understand the scientific concepts and principles. (2) It was hard to find the situations which teachers provided opportunities for divergent and critical thinking to their students. Based on these results, the followings were recommended: (1) Inquiry methods should be regarded as a goal not as a tool and be used to acquire inquiry methods themselves. (2) Teachers should not stick to the prescribed inquiry methods prescribed in the textbook, but to give opportunities for thinking various kinds of inquiry methods to improve divergent and critical thinking.

• School Mathematics
• /
• v.10 no.4
• /
• pp.583-601
• /
• 2008

The creative productivity is regarded as an essential factor to perform the gifted education. While it is very important to cultivate and to expand a creative productivity through mathematically problem solving in gifted education, we have difficulties in actual education of the (mathematically) gifted, even are there few researches/studies which deal with teaching and guiding the creative problem solving in mathematically gifted education, it is hard to find a guideline that provides proper ways (or directions) of learning-instruction and evaluation of the mathematically gifted. Therefore in this study, the researcher would provide a learning-instruction model to expand a creative productivity. The learning-instruction model which makes the creative productivity expanded in mathematically gifted education is developed and named MG-CPS(Mathematically Gifted-Creative Problem Solving). Since it reflected characteristics of academic- mathematical creativity and higher thinking level of the mathematically gifted, this model is distinguished from general CPS. So this model is proper to provide a learning experience and instruction to the mathematically gifted.

• Communications of Mathematical Education
• /
• v.18 no.3 s.20
• /
• pp.81-94
• /
• 2004

수학적 창의성의 개념을 과정적 정의로서 창의적 문제해결력으로 규정하여 수학적 영재의 판별을 문제 발견의 창의성과 문제해결의 창의성으로 나누고 각각에 대한 판별검사 도구에 대하여 논의하였다.

• Proceedings of the Korean Society of Computer Information Conference
• /
• 2020.01a
• /
• pp.281-283
• /
• 2020

본 연구는 2015년 교육과정에 명시된 정보교과의 운영방침과 중등학교 소프트웨어 교육 현황을 분석하고, 이에 대한 문제점을 해결 할 수 있는 방안으로 창의적 문제 해결력을 통한 소프트웨어 교육 모형을 제안한다. 창의적 문제 해결력은 확산적 사고와 수렴적 사고를 통해 학생들이 문제 해결에 필요한 사고를 키울 수 있는 모형이다. 이에 본 논문에서는 컴퓨팅 사고력을 가진 창의·융합 인재 육성이라는 소프트웨어의 교육 목표를 달성하기 위해 기존의 CPS모형과 CT의 요소간의 유사점을 확인하고 이를 바탕으로 새로운 CPS-SW 모형을 제안한다. CPS-SW 모형으로 컴퓨팅 사고력과 창의적 문제해결력을 키울 수 있으며, 이를 통해 미래 사회에 필요한 인재육성을 위한 소프트웨어 교육의 발전에 기여하고자 한다. 또한 CPS-SW 모형을 적용할 수 있는 프로그램과 학생들이 창의적 문제해결력을 키울 수 있는 학습에 대한 연구가 필요할 것으로 예상한다.

• Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education
• /
• v.33 no.1
• /
• pp.30-45
• /
• 2013

In this study, we developed a model for analyzing scientists' creative thinking processes, and analyzed Archimedes' thinking process in solving the golden crown problem. As results show, scientists' complex problem solving processes could be represented as a repeating circular model, and the fusion of processes of diverse thinking required for scientists' creativity could be analyzed from the case. Also in this study, we represented the role of experiments in scientists' creative discovery, and investigated the reasons for the difference between the viewpoints of textbooks and historic facts. We found the importance of abductive reasoning and advance knowledge in creative thinking. Archimedes solved the golden crown problem creatively by crossing the scientific thought of dynamics and the daily thought of baths. In this process, abductive reasoning and advance knowledge played an important role. Besides Archimedes' case, if we would reconstruct the creative discovery processes of diverse scientists' in textbooks, students could raise their creative thinking ability by experiencing these processes as educational steps.

• Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education
• /
• v.20 no.2
• /
• pp.307-328
• /
• 2000

The purpose of this study is to develop and implement an alternative elementary science curriculum to enhance creative problem solving abilities. The curriculum consisting of three main elements was developed. The three elements are content knowledge, process knowledge and creative thinking skills. The curriculum was validated by more than 10 science educators, scientists, and curriculum specialists. In order to implement the curriculum, three lessons for 5th grade were developed and taught by a problem-based-learning(PBL) method in an experimental group during the second semester. For the comparison group the ordinary lesson based on the 6th national science curriculum was taught by the same science teacher during the same period. Performance assessment was developed and used for the pre and post test. Two-way ANOVA, and T-test were used to check whether there are any significant differences between the gains of scores(pre-post test) of the two groups. The results of the test showed that the experimental group increased significantly in the total creative thinking problem solving skills, but the comparision group did not.