• 대한위암학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 2003.04a
• /
• pp.19-19
• /
• 2003

• Proceedings of the Korean Magnestics Society Conference
• /
• 2003.06a
• /
• pp.80-81
• /
• 2003

• Proceedings of the Korean Powder Metallurgy Institute Conference
• /
• 2000.04a
• /
• pp.49-49
• /
• 2000

• The Korean Publising Journal, Monthly
• /
• s.226
• /
• pp.11-11
• /
• 1997

지식인들의 지식체계는 개인적 삶의 차원을 넘어서 나라 전체의 흥망성쇠를 좌우할 수 있다는 점에서 중요하다. 올해 경제학계의 '시장이냐, 정부냐'를 둘러싼 논쟁은 한국경제가 새 국면에 접어드는 이 시점에서 새로 시작돼도 좋을 중요한 사안이었다.

• Proceedings of the Korean Magnestics Society Conference
• /
• 2004.06a
• /
• pp.140-141
• /
• 2004

• Korea Petroleum Association Journal
• /
• no.8 s.78
• /
• pp.96-99
• /
• 1987

이 자료는 현재 NATO 석유계획위원회 의장인 미에너지성 소속의 Tom Cutler 씨가 Petroleum Economist사 87년 5월호에 발표한 글을 번역한 것이다. 아울러 여기에 게재된 내용은 사적인 견해이며, 미정부나 NATO의 공식입장이 아님을 밝혀둔다.

• The Korean Publising Journal, Monthly
• /
• s.252
• /
• pp.12-13
• /
• 1999

일본의 비판적 지식인들이 인문학 서가를 두텁게 하고 있다. 지금까지 일본 관련서가 주로 일본의 대중문학이나 '일본 알기'류의 표피적인 수준에 머물렀다면, 일본의 독특한 근대경험을 반성적으로 통찰하거나 한일간의 민감한 의제를 양심적인 시각에서 재조명한 책이 부쩍 늘었다. 특히 일본의 근대성을 탐구한 책이 집중 소개돼 국내 독자에게 서구와는 다른 제3의 시각을 보여줄 것으로 보인다.

• Journal of the Korea Convergence Society
• /
• v.8 no.11
• /
• pp.373-381
• /
• 2017

As the viewpoint of data evolves from business resources to value resources, the focus on the data processing is rapidly shifting from the cartesian (alphanumeric) to the contextual. In response to this trend, the government is actively promoting the utilization of public data by the private sectors. With a focus on the fact that the mainstream of public data users is the crowds, this study, therefore, seeks to identify differences between the members and the crowds from information processing view, followed by presenting directions and main points for the design of data platform. This study is perhaps to be a starting point for finding practical alternatives for creating 'collective intelligence ecosystem' and to be a basis for building a big data base in response to the opening of public data.

• The Journal of the Korea Contents Association
• /
• v.10 no.12
• /
• pp.120-128
• /
• 2010

Web development and digital technology enable users not only to consume contents but also to produce and share it through using various media. Thus, since personal needs for contents are increased, the interest in environment and technology for creating digital contents is growing. Because of existing digital contents technology such as writing tool or digital storyboard have focused on the individual creation, it is hard to induce participation and collaboration of other users and sharing and reusing contents. Therefore, we suggest a new form of collaborate digital storytelling using the concept of the collective intelligence through contest. Most of all, we develop writing tool and storyboard tool in order to facilitate participants to produce online contents. Also, distinguished from previous contest, this contest considers not only content output but also collaborative process for making it.

• Journal of Korean Philosophical Society
• /
• v.142
• /
• pp.145-164
• /
• 2017

In his Phenomenology of Perception, Merleau-Ponty raises a question of why he has to ask what phenomenology is again. This study assumes that the question can be answered in a new understanding of the "nature" concept and finds its possible grounds in the nature concepts of Schelling and Merleau-Ponty. Schelling and Merleau-Ponty develop philosophical thinking from a critical point of view on the Cartesian and Kantian philosophies "Thing-in-itself" by Kant is, in particular, one of important questions that has to be answered in the philosophy of Schelling since Kant further solidifies a dualistic world by leaving thing-in-itself. Schelling solves the question with the concept of identity and Merleau-Ponty solves the question with body-subject. What we notice in this article is the understanding of Shelling and Merleau-Ponty about nature. Schelling believes there are the creative activities of unconscious intelligence in nature, but spirit or intelligence in his nature concept cannot induce an existential being. Here we see that Schelling is still beyond the traditional epistemological framework. To restore the original nature of nature, we must begin with an understanding of the totality of nature. Nature must also be explained through relationships with humans. Merleau-Ponty shows the entanglement of nature and spirit through the body-subject. In Merleau-Ponty's phenomenology, the body is the equivalent of nature. Understanding the forces of nature that Schelling and Merleau-Ponty are trying to show, and at the same time explaining the problem of how the mind or human beings emerge from nature, we will be able to discover the true nature of nature.