• Management & Information Systems Review
• /
• v.28 no.4
• /
• pp.45-66
• /
• 2009

This research investigates the systematic relation between corporate governance and corporate social responsibility(CSR). Based on the argument that corporate governance would play the role of mitigating conflicts between firms and society, we hypothesized that corporate governance would enhance CSR performance. Specifically, the firms with good governance are predicted to have CSR performance than those with bad governance. These hypotheses were tested using 130ce rean firms from 1998 to 2005. An index published by e rean Economic Justice mance the(KEJm) was used as the measureses wSR performance. Our empirical results suggest that the firms with good governance as measured by f reign investh bad goothshae directh bad goirdit committee exhibit better CSR performance. The primary purposeses this s tdy is to identify the determinants es the use b' satissaction and commitment in pe bn thomedia. For these purposes, we developegoi research modehobased on the literaturesreviews es pe bn tho media, pe ceived risk and interactivity, satissaction, and commitment. This study has identified four dimensions in the concept of perceived risk, such as privacy risk, social risk, time loss risk, and economic risk, and three dimensions in the concept of perceived interactivity, such as active control, two-way communication, and responsiveness.

• Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship
• /
• v.5 no.4
• /
• pp.35-49
• /
• 2010

The purpose of this study is to help the venture business innovate the purchasing process. This study reviewed the types of transaction governance structure, and researched the change of transaction governance structure, while using information technology. According to transaction cost theory, the transaction governance structure can be moved from hierarchy to market. It can be moved to the middle, because of economies of scale, incentive for supplier, and increasing search cost. And it can be moved from market exchange to relational exchange, using electronic marketplace. In order to innovate the purchasing process, the venture business can select the transaction governance structure that fits the its purchasing contexts.

• The Korean Journal of Financial Studies
• /
• v.9 no.1
• /
• pp.37-67
• /
• 2003

현재 기업지배구조의 개선은 OECD 및 세계은행, CalPERS 등의 국제기관투자자는 물론이고 각국정부의 주요 과제로 등장하고 있다. 한국의 경우 기업지배구조의 개선이 핵심적인 경제이슈로 부각된 것은 1997년말에 닥친 외환위기와 극심한 불황을 당하고 나서라고 할 수 있다. 그후 외환위기의 극복과정에서 기업지배구조 모범규준 제정, 이사회 및 감사기구의 강화, 소수주주의 권한 강화, 기관투자자(외국인투자자 포함) 및 시민단체의 활동강화, 기업지배권 시장의 활성화 등 주로 정부주도에 의한 제도변화가 급속하게 도입 시행되었다. 일본의 경우에는 기업지배구조 개선에 대한 공식적인 논의는 한국보다 앞섰으나 제도의 도입과 실행은 한국에 비하여 상당히 늦었다. 2001년 12월의 상법개정에서 감사역의 독립성 강화, 사외감사역 제도의 충실화, 취체역의 책임경감, 주주대표 소송의 합리화 등 비교적 큰 폭의 제도개선이 이루어졌다. 그러나 사외이사를 중심으로 하는 미국식 이사회 제도의 채택은 향후의 개혁방향에 포함되어 있다.

• Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship
• /
• v.10 no.2
• /
• pp.27-42
• /
• 2015

The aim of this research is to investigate the difference in the capturing opportunities for each type of venture companies in the industry undergoing competition of a dominant design and then figure out the reason why they can be successful. Existing studies on venture companies are focused on the way to enhance a firm's competencies by acquiring and combining its resources. However, it is important for startups which have a lack of resources and capabilities to capture the opportunity to survive by understanding a changing environment. This study is focused on opportunity capture and strategic response to a changing environment and attempts to select and observe startup companies which are able to capture the opportunity and enter the market in the industry undergoing dominant design competition. In order to find out its difference in different types of business, we select one case from hardware startups and the other from software startups. According to the result of this study, the hardware startup focuses on market extension by lowering their prices and the software startup strives to induce more users to participate by the universalization of enabling technology so as to extend and standardize their technology in the environment undergoing dominant design competition. This feature of environment leads the difference in the approach for successfully capturing opportunity and thus hardware firms need to recognize the opportunity with profit potential from relationship with a number of cooperative firms while software firms need to identify the opportunity for extension of enabling technology which can be used by many users.

• The Journal of Society for e-Business Studies
• /
• v.8 no.4
• /
• pp.17-32
• /
• 2003

A organization confront new information systems and technologies , they often force to make very expensive decisions on the basis of little information about the product's benefits and potential acceptance within the organization. This paper identifies trust and governance factors influencing the implementation of business-to-business electronic commerce systems. The result support between information technology governance and governance in value chain and business-to-business electronic commerce systems implementation, but there is no evidence that trust enabled implementing business-to-business electronic commerce systems.

• Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society
• /
• v.15 no.1
• /
• pp.129-136
• /
• 2014

This paper examines the effects of dominating large shareholders and foreign blockholders on credit ratings. An effective governance mechanism is expected to lead to higher credit ratings through its impact on default risk of the firm. Our results show that dominating large shareholders have an adverse impact on credit ratings of domestic firms on the level of its statistical significance. Foreign shareholders are positively associated with credit ratings, contributing to the higher credit worthness of domestic firms.

• Journal of Digital Convergence
• /
• v.16 no.9
• /
• pp.125-132
• /
• 2018

Despite the fact that corporate real estate ratio accounts for a considerable proportion of the assets, such researches and studies are lacking and there is not enough such policies to utilize real estate more effectively in Korea. In particular, after IFRS adoption, the owner and manager needs to utilize corporate real estate assets as the assets are revalued. In this study, we analyzed the relationship between corporate governance, corporate real estate holding policies and firm value based on financial data from 2010 to 2016. As a result of regression analysis, this study showed that more Dictatorship Portfolio, the higher proportion of corporate real estate holdings. Next, the higher proportion of corporate real estate holdings, the lower the firm value. This study suggests that corporate real estate is recognized an important factor and should have proper holding ratio. I will continue my research to show that the corporate holding policies are an important asset impact by verifying the mediating effect between corporate governance and firm value in the future.

• 한국벤처창업학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 2019.11a
• /
• pp.165-170
• /
• 2019

본 논문은 매출액대비연구개발비비중과 배당성향이라는 두 지표를 사용하여 IPO 전후 기업 경영의 변화를 관측하고, 이 같은 변화가 장기적인 기업 발전을 위한 창업자의 지배권 보장이라는 차등의결권 주식 발행의 필요성을 입증하는지 검토한다. 매출액대비연구개발비와 배당성향은 각각 장기적인 목적과 단기적 목적의 현금흐름 사용의 대표적 지표로서, 두 지표는 현금흐름의 처분에 대한 주주의 압력을 간접적으로 측정하는 지표이다. 두 지표가 IPO를 전후하여 크게 차이를 보이며, 또 그 차이가 단기적 이익보다 장기적 성과를 중시하는 방향으로 나타난다면 장기적 기업 가치 제고를 위해 차등의결권의 유용성을 방증할 수 있으나, 반대의 경우에는 차등의결권 도입의 실증적 근거가 미약하다고 할 수 있다. 본 논문의 분석 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 2000년부터 2016년까지 유가증권시장과 코스닥시장, 코넥스시장에 상장한 기업 중 IPO 전후 3년 간, 즉 t-3년 ~ t+3년에 각각 연구개발비비중과 배당성향을 공시하고 있는 278개 기업과 37개 기업을 조사한 결과, 매출액대비연구개발비 비중이 IPO 이후 반드시 감소하였다고 판단할 수 없었다. 둘째, 배당성향은 일관되게 IPO 이전 수준이 IPO 이후 수준보다 높았다. 이 같은 결과는 기업의 장기적 발전을 위하여 창업자의 지배권을 보장하기 위해 차등의결권이 필요하다는 주장의 실증적 근거가 명확하지 않음을 의미한다. 단기적 시각의 주주에 대항하여 현금흐름과 지배권이 분리된 주식을 발행할 필요가 있다는 주장보다는 차등의결권이 지배주주의 경영권 영속화의 수단으로 활용될 수 있다는 비판이 보다 설득력이 있을 수 있다.

• The Korean Journal of Financial Management
• /
• v.16 no.2
• /
• pp.119-156
• /
• 1999

본 연구는 우리나라 기업지배권 시장에서 합병이 과연 새로운 부를 창출하는가를 상장기업들 간의 합병사례를 이용하여 실증적으로 분석한다. 이를 위해, 우리나리 증권시장에서 1980년에서부터 1997년까지의 기간동안 성공적으로 이루어진 상장기업 간 합병사례 중에서 34개 합병기업 및 합병대상기업을 표본기업으로 선정하여, 공시일과 최종 합병일을 전후로 한 합병절차의 전과정에서 발생하는 합병의 가치효과를 추정한다. 실증분석 결과, 합병기업 및 합병대상기업의 주주들은 선행연구의 결과와는 달리 합병절차의 전과정을 통해 새로운 부의 창출에 기여하지 못하는 것으로 나타났다. 합병대상기업의 경우에는 오히려 합병 공시일에서 최종 합병일까지의 중간기간 동안에 유의적인 음의 초과수익률을 얻는 것으로 나타났다. 특히, 합병대상기업의 규모가 합병기업에 비해 상대적으로 작을수록, 합병대상기업의 경영부실화가 심할수록, 공시일-합병일 중간기간에서 발견되는 합병대상기업의 주주 부의 감소가 더욱 확대된다는 것을 발견하였다. 이러한 연구 결과는, 우리나라 기업지배권 시장에서 합병기업이 주주의 부를 극대화시키는 동기에서 합병을 추진하고 있지 않다는 것을 시사해 주고 있다.

• Journal of Korea Society of Industrial Information Systems
• /
• v.24 no.1
• /
• pp.81-94
• /
• 2019

The corporate social responsibility has become an industry norm, and the majority of companies have adopted corporate social responsibility (CSR) activities due to institutional pressure. This paper suggests that chief executive officer (CEO) characteristics and governance mechanisms such as CEOs hubris, outside directors, and foreign ownership can influence a managerial decision of following the norm in adopting CSR. This paper argues that a CEO with hubris carry out CSR considerably less or more than a CEO without hubris because a CEO with hubris are known to have a tendency to refuse to follow the norm from institutional pressure. On the contrary, corporate governance mechanisms can guide a CEO to follow the industrial norm related to CSR because governance mechanisms tend to control CEO to reduce managerial uncertainty. The results show that CEO with hubris has a positive relationship with the degree of CSR deviation while governance mechanisms have a negative relationship. In addition, governance mechanisms negatively moderate the relationship between CEO with hubris and with the degree of CSR deviation.