• 공원문화
• /
• s.8
• /
• pp.24-31
• /
• 1978

• 공원문화
• /
• s.79
• /
• pp.28-34
• /
• 2001

• 공원문화
• /
• s.42
• /
• pp.5-10
• /
• 1989

• 공원문화
• /
• s.35
• /
• pp.49-50
• /
• 1987

• 공원문화
• /
• s.39.40
• /
• pp.20-25
• /
• 1988

본고는 국립공원지 35호('87. 3. 31간) 36호('87. 9. 30. 간)에 이어 현지조사로 국.도립공원별 삼림경관자원의 문제점을 지적하여 이의 관리대책을 제시한 것이므로 각급 자연공원의 관계자와 회원들의 숙독을 바란다.

• Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture
• /
• v.43 no.4
• /
• pp.75-86
• /
• 2015

The survey was taken from July to August 2012 by users who visited Gyeongju National Park to compare the perceived gap of users regarding management policy by characteristic of Gyeongju National Park district type in this study. Gyeongju National Park users' characteristic, use pattern and perception regarding park management policy were created as survey items. First, district type was classified based on use pattern of the visitor and the key resources of 8 districts in Gyeongju National Park. Tohamsan District, which has many visitors for the purpose of scenery appreciation and recreation with Bulguksa and Seokguram Grotto, is classified as tourism type, Namsan and Daebon District, which bring in many visitors seeking to learn about historical culture and environmental education, could be classified as historical culture education types, and Hwarang, Seoak, Sogeum River, Gumisan District are places residents use for physical training, hiking and walking to improve health, thus classifying them as neighborhood park types. People perceived that the tourism type is where users for historical artifact tours are concentrated, thus consideration for plans that can improve visitors' satisfaction from a user limit policy is required, and a manager's right to control use behavior must be reinforced in historical culture education types. On the other hand, users of neighborhood parks found the lowest necessity for most of the policy, and this showed that users of each of Gyeongju National Park's districts felt differently about the need for policies. This result is expected to be utilized as a database for introducing policy that reflects the perception of users in each districts of Gyeongju National Park in the future.

• Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture
• /
• v.36 no.5
• /
• pp.42-54
• /
• 2008

The objective of this study is to critically examine the result and the quality of urban park design as infrastructure by analyzing the landscape architectural design competition for Cheongna New City, which was organized by the Korea Land Corporation. This paper is meaningful in that it broadly examines several recent design competitions for urban parks, thereby discussing what the future urban park should be. This study explores the existing analysis methods of design competitions in order to establish a comprehensive method of analysis for the Cheongna competition. Through reinterpreting the concept of the urban park as infrastructure and the design strategies of landscape urbanism, nine key words and a framework for the analysis of urban park design are established. By analyzing the guidelines for the competition, five key words; networking, site, ecology, scale, and infrastructure have been selected and are used as the framework of analysis for the competition. The analysis of the contestants of the competition based on the proposed analysis method leads to a few implications for urban park design as infrastructure: networking and scale from the perspective of the development site; the creation of a sense of place and symbolism in creating the urban image; planning for an ecological urban environment; focus on the significance of the urban park as infrastructure. These implications are highlighted and discussed by the contestants through a variety of experiments. These ideas, however, are provided as a simple configuration of shapes and conceptual explanations and fail to be developed into synthetic, practical strategies.

• Korean Journal of Environment and Ecology
• /
• v.12 no.1
• /
• pp.14-21
• /
• 1998

Landscape has two side, ecological structure and visual characteristics. And Landscape evaluation should be implemented from this viewpoint. In this study, landscape of the Moodeungsan natural park was evaluated based on ecological and visual characteristics, and the results was compared with the existing zoning. And it was recognized that the areas having high preserbability are located in the nature environmental zone. For the purpose of natural park management planning, in this study, rezoning method of natural park based on landscape evaluation is proposed.

• 공원문화
• /
• s.53
• /
• pp.34-35
• /
• 1992

환경과 개발에 관한 "리우"선언은 스톡홀름선언을 재확인하고 이를 더욱 공고히 할 것을 추구하여 모든 국가와 사회의 주요분야, 그리고 모든 사람들 사이의 새로운 차원의 협력을 창조함으로써 새롭고 공평한 범세계적 동반자 관계를 수립할 목적으로, 모두의 이익을 존중하고 또한 지구의 환경 및 개발체제의 통합성을 보호하기 위한 국제협정체결을 위하여 노력하며, 우리들의 고향인 지구의 통합적이며 상호의존적인 성격을 인식하면서, 다음과 같이 선언한다.

• Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture
• /
• v.39 no.5
• /
• pp.48-56
• /
• 2011

The objective of this study is to develop quantitative criteria for setting reasonable standards and regulations for building heights in collective facility districts inside national parks or those connected to their borders. Heights of all building sin collective facility districts were simulated in order to determine heights of ridge lines of sight passing the upper parts of buildings from a main view point. Where a facility's zone is located at the inside or boundary of inland mountainous national parks, and there are coastal type national parks with mountains in the background, the study recommended assigning the maximum allowable height of a building as 8.82m if national park authorities intend to preserve the ridges at three-tenths the height of a mountain. It amounts to 3 or 3.5 stories when it is converted into the number of floors. It is desirable to apply this standard to accommodations like a hotel except lodge or cottage as the maximum allowable height of a building. Nevertheless, when there aren't back mountainous areas among coastal-type national parks, there is a need for applying a separate standard. If an equal and uniform standard is applied to all collective facility districts, it becomes difficult to address local differences when managing landscape. There must be flexibility when applying a standard, depending on variables such as location of view points, differences in the methods of selection of view points, and differences in view angles, etc. Thus, there is a need for different landscape management strategies that address the unique natural environment of different zones.