• Proceedings of the Korea Water Resources Association Conference
• /
• 2017.05a
• /
• pp.179-179
• /
• 2017

우리나라는 국토면적의 약 64%가 산지로 이루어져 있으며 동고서저의 지형을 이루고 있다. 강원도 영동지방의 경우는 고도가 높으며 경사가 급한 특징을 지니고 있으며 이러한 지형적 특징으로 태풍 및 집중호우 시, 산지재해에 취약할 수밖에 없다. 더욱이 최근, 기후변화로 인한 이상기후 현상에 의해 태풍 및 집중호우가 빈번해 산지재해의 발생빈도도 높아지고 있는 실정이다. 그에 따라 대규모의 인적, 물적 등의 피해 또한 증가하고 있다. 산지재해 같은 경우, 예측이 어려우나 그러한 피해를 줄이기 위해서는 산지재해의 발생예상 지역, 피해정도 및 규모에 대한 예측 자료가 필요하다. 재해지도는 그에 따른 예측 자료로써 대상 지역의 위험요인과 잠재적인 영향 등을 표시하여 재해를 예방하는 데에 목적을 두고 있다. 이러한 재해지도를 작성하기 위해 사용되는 기법으로는 정량적 기법의 대표적인 방법으로 결정론적 기법(SHALATAB, SINMAP, GEOtop-FS), 확률론적 기법(빈도비분석법, 우도비, 증거가중법 등), 통계적 기법(로지스틱 회귀분석, 인공신경망 기법)을 사용하고 있다. 본 연구에서는 정량적 기법 중 하나인 결정론적 기법을 활용하여 위험지역을 분석하고 실제 위험지역과 비교하였다. 추후에 확률론적 기법과 통계적인 기법을 활용하여 위험지역을 분석하고자 한다.

• Economic Analysis
• /
• v.25 no.4
• /
• pp.25-57
• /
• 2019

This paper studies localization effects of knowledge spillovers in Korea using U.S. patents granted over the period 1996-2015. The "sample-matching" analysis initiated by Jaffe, Trajtenberg, and Henderson (1993) is adopted. We do not find evidence of positive localization effects in Korea. In particular, controlling for the existing geographic distribution of knowledge production, the frequency of domestic citations of Korean patents is no more than the citation frequency from overseas, and the difference is decreasing within the sample period. We also examine localization effects across regions and industries, and compare Korea with Taiwan and Japan.

• Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education
• /
• v.31 no.5
• /
• pp.694-708
• /
• 2011

In this study, we developed tasks including cognitive scaffolding for students to explain scientific phenomena using valid evidences in science classroom and sought to investigate how tasks influence the development of small group scientific argumentation. Heterogeneous small groups in gender and achievement were organized in one classroom and the tasks were applied to the class. Students were asked to write down their own ideas, share individual ideas, and then choose the most plausible opinion in a group. One group was chosen for investigating the effect of tasks on the development of small group argumentation through the analysis of discourse transcripts of the group in 10 lessons, students' semi-structured interview, field note, and students' pre- and post argument tests. The discrepant argument examples were included in the tasks for students to refute an argument presenting evidences. Moreover, comparing opinion within the group and persuading others were included in the tasks to prompt small group argumentation. As a result, students' post-argument test grades were increased than pre-test grades, and they argued involving evidences and reasoning. The high level of arguments has appeared with high ratio of advanced utterances and lengthening of reasoning chain as lessons went on. Students had elaborate claims involving valid evidences and reasoning by reflective and critical thinking while discussing about the tasks. In addition, tasks which could have various warrants based on the data led to students' spontaneous participation. Therefore, this study has significance in understanding the context of developing small group argumentation, providing information about teaching and learning context prompting students to construct arguments in science inquiry lessons in middle school.

• Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education
• /
• v.33 no.4
• /
• pp.840-862
• /
• 2013

This study undertook a methodological investigation on previous research that had proposed alternative methods for analyzing argumentative discourse in science classes in terms of collaborative construction and epistemic enactments of argumentation. The study also proposed a new way of analyzing argumentation discourse based on the achievements and limitations of previous research. The new method was applied to actual argumentation discourse episodes to examine its feasibility. For these purposes, we chose the studies employing Toulmin's argument layout, seeking for a method to analyze comprehensively the structure, content, and justification of arguments, or emphasizing evidence-based reasoning processes of argumentation discourse. In addition, we contrived an alternative method of analyzing argumentative discourse, Discourse Register on the Evidence-Explanation Continuum (DREEC), and applied DREEC to an argumentative discourse episode that occurred in an actual science classroom. The advanced methods of analyzing argumentative discourse used in previous research usually examined argument structure by the presence and absence of the elements of Toulmin's argument layout or its extension. Those methods, however, had some problems in describing and comparing the quality of argumentation based on the justification and epistemic enactments of the arguments, while they could analyze and compare argumentative discourse quantitatively. Also, those methods had limitations on showing participants' collaborative construction during the argumentative discourse. In contrast, DREEC could describe collaborative construction through the relationships between THEMEs and RHEMEs and the links of data, evidence, pattern, and explanation in the discourse, as well as the justification of arguments based on the flow of epistemic enactments of the argumentative discourse.

• Journal of the Korea Institute of Information Security & Cryptology
• /
• v.29 no.1
• /
• pp.77-91
• /
• 2019

Recent Linux operating systems having been increasingly used, ranging from automotive consoles, CCTV, IoT devices, and mobile devices to various versions of the kernel. Because these devices can be used as strong evidence in criminal investigations, there is a risk of destroying evidence through file deletion. Ext filesystem forensics has been studied in depth because it can recovery deleted files without depending on the kind of device. However, studies have been carried out without consideration of characteristics of file system which may vary depending on the kernel. This problem can lead to serious situations, such as those that can impair investigative ability and cause doubt of evidence ability, when an actual investigation attempts to analyze a different version of the kernel. Because investigations can be performed on various distribution and kernel versions of Linux file systems at the actual investigation site, analysis of the metadata changes that occur when files are deleted by Linux distribution and kernel versions is required. Therefore, in this paper, we analyze the difference of metadata according to the Linux kernel as a solution to this and recovery deleted file. After that, the investigating agency needs to consider the metadata change caused by the difference of Linux kernel version when performing Ext filesystem forensics.

• Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society
• /
• v.21 no.12
• /
• pp.456-468
• /
• 2020

This exploratory study, related to the introduction of Western-style family doctors, was conducted based on a comparative survey of medical care satisfaction in foreign residents of the U.S. and Canada based on a consumer-centered perspective. As a result of statistical analysis based on 493 collections of empirical data from 2016 to 2018, the main conclusions of this study are as follows. First, there was no evidence that satisfaction with US and Canadian family doctors was higher than the satisfaction with Korean primary care physicians. Second, satisfaction with Korean primary care physicians was high with regard to treatment, promptness, etc., and there was no evidence that foreign family doctor systems were better in terms of sufficient counseling and explanation. Third, overseas Koreans in the United States showed less satisfaction with their family doctors than Koreans in Canada. Fourth, overseas Koreans preferred to visit a hospital directly, without a referral from the family doctor. In conclusion, there is insufficient evidence showing that satisfaction with family doctors in the U.S. and Canada is higher than satisfaction with primary care doctors in Korea. Therefore, a more in-depth, additional analysis on the Western-style family doctor is needed before introducing such a system in Korea.

• Proceedings of the Korean Society of Computer Information Conference
• /
• 2013.01a
• /
• pp.81-83
• /
• 2013

절도란 경제적 이익을 꾀하려는 목적으로 타인 소유의 재물을 그의 허락 없이 가져가 본인이나 제삼자의 것으로 만드는 것을 말한다. 현재 엘리베이터 내에서 자주 발생하는 범죄 중의 하나가 바로 절도이다. 본 논문에서는 절도 범죄를 장면 전환 검출 방법인 컬러 히스토그램을 이용하여 추출한다. 추출된 키 프레임들은 범죄의 주요 장면들이다. 여기서 추출된 영상은 법원에 절도죄의 중요한 증거자료로 제출된다.

• Proceedings of the Korean Society of Computer Information Conference
• /
• 2013.01a
• /
• pp.75-77
• /
• 2013

엘리베이터 내에서는 흡연이 금지되어 있으며 엘리베이터 내에서 흡연을 하는 것은 매우 잘못된 일이다. 흡연은 우리 청소년과 여성들에게 매우 좋지 않다. 본 논문에서는 엘리베이터 내에서 흡연을 하는 사람을 추출하여 포렌식 증거 자료로 법원에 제출하기 위해서이다. 추출을 위하여 엘리베이터에 탄 사람의 얼굴 주위를 부분적으로 장면 전환 검출하여 추출한다. 얼굴 주변에 흰색 막대를 검출하는 방법으로 흡연 여부를 결정한다. 연기를 내뿜는 것에 관한 연구는 나중에 할 것이다. 장면 전환 검출은 컬러히스토그램으로 추출하도록 한다.

• Proceedings of the Korean Society of Computer Information Conference
• /
• 2013.01a
• /
• pp.95-97
• /
• 2013

현재 엘리베이터 내에서는 수많은 범죄들이 발생하고 있으며, 그 대담성 또한 날로 증가하고 있다. 본 논문에서는 불법한 유형력의 행사인 폭행과 이러한 폭행에 동반되는 물리적인 행사인 폭력에 대하여 의미를 알아본다. 그리고 엘리베이터 내에서 발생하는 폭행과 폭력을 추출하는 방법을 제시하도록 한다. 장면 전환 검출 방법 중의 하나인 컬러히스토그램 기법을 사용하여 키프레임을 추출한다. 추출된 키 프레임들은 영상 포렌식에서 범죄 현장을 담은 장면의 증거자료인 프레임이 된다.

• The Korean Journal of Financial Management
• /
• v.14 no.3
• /
• pp.231-261
• /
• 1997

본 연구는 우리나라 상장기업에서 만연하고 있는 대주주와 소액주주간의 차등배당이 결정되는 배경을 이해하기 위하여 투자재원가설, 이익가설 및 특권적소비가설의 세가지 가설을 설정하고 상장기업 191개사에 대하여 1987년부터 1996년까지 10년간을 자료를 이용하여 실증분석을 실시하였다. 실증분석은 균등배당업체와 차등배당업체간의 기업 특성의 평균차이분석과 차등배당여부를 종속변수로 하고 기업특성변수를 독립변수로 한 Logit 분석의 두 가지를 실시하였는데 실증분석결과를 요약하면 다음과 같다. 먼저 이익가설은 전반적으로 지지되었으나 이익가설의 핵심인 배당감소의 역정보효과가설은 지지하는 뚜렷한 증거를 발견할 수 없었다. 투자 재원가설은 재벌기업과 비재벌기업간에 큰 차이를 보였는데 비재벌기업은 투자재원의 크기가 차등배당가능성에 유의적인 부의 영향을 주는 반면 재벌기업은 투자재원의 크기가 차등배당에 유의적인 영향을 주지 않는 것으로 나타나 재벌기업에는 내부자본시장이 존재함이 간접적으로 입증되었다. 끝으로 특권적소비가설은 제2대주주의 존재여부가 차등배당 가능성에 부의 유의적인 영향을 주는 것으로 나타나 부분적으로 지지되었다.