• Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society
• /
• v.40 no.4
• /
• pp.93-111
• /
• 2009

This study aimed to analyze teacher librarians' perceptions of the importance and performance frequency of their roles inherent in the indicators and items for teacher evaluation and to determine their appropriateness. The results revealed that most indicators and items are appropriate for evaluating teacher librarians' job performance, but some items need to be revised to properly reflect teacher librarians' job tasks. Specific recommendations for their improvement were discussed.

• Journal of the East Asian Society of Dietary Life
• /
• v.21 no.3
• /
• pp.385-391
• /
• 2011

The purpose of this study was to analyze the importance and performance of sanitation management within childcare center foodservice facilities in Gyeongbuk province. The survey involved 248 people who participated in the food hygiene and safety education for childcare center managers in Gyeongbuk province from June to July 2010. A total of 236 survey papers were analyzed statistically by SPSS program. By the method, t-test and importance-performance analysis (IPA) was performed. Among the respondents, facility managers are 40s (41.9%) which accounted the most percentage, and for the type of facility, the largest amount was home (39.9%). The number of preschool children who are under 20 people accounted for 45.3% and food service staffs were accounted for 36.7%. No significant differences were observed for the four items on the IPA, except for the topics "the immediate deal with trash and leftover food" and "minimizing time (within 2 hours) for distribution after cooking" (p<0.001). The average score on the IPA was 4.14 points, and the average score for the importance of the evaluation was 4.49 points out of 5. Finally, childcare facility managers are aware of the importance that is lower than can be done. The results suggest that continuing education is necessary to administrators to manage the health care facility effectively.

• Proceedings of the Korean Society of Disaster Information Conference
• /
• 2023.11a
• /
• pp.103-104
• /
• 2023

본 연구는 최근 중대재해 처벌법 시행에 따라 관심이 높아지고 있는 근로자 참여형 위험성 평가를 위한 중요한 평가 요소를 확인하기 위해 수행되었다. 연구의 목적은 다음과 같다. 첫째로, 근로자 참여형 위험성 평가를 위한 관련 선행연구 및 위험성 평가 지침과 같은 관련 선행 문헌을 분석하였다. 둘째로, 위험성 평가 전문가들의 대안을 통해 위험성 평가에서 중요한 상위 개층 요인을 확인하였다. 셋째로, 위험성 평가에 대한 중요한 요인을 계층화 대안 모델을 검증하기 위해 안전관리자와 근로자를 대상으로 한 집단 간의 상대적 중요도를 측정하기 위해 계층분석(Analytical Hierarchy Process) 방법을 사용하였다. 이를 통해 건설 현장에서 근로자 참여형 위험성 평가를 수행하기 위한 이행력 관리 수단 및 위험 조치 수립을 위한 기초 자료를 제공하고자 하였다.

• Journal of the Korea Convergence Society
• /
• v.13 no.2
• /
• pp.303-312
• /
• 2022

In this study, the importance-performance analysis (IPA) of the content components of remote graduate students was conducted. To this end, an online survey of 221 remote graduate students at J University obtained the following results. First, the importance of content components by area was in the order of learning content, interaction, teaching-learning strategy, and evaluation, and the degree of execution was in the order of teaching-learning strategy, interaction, evaluation, and learning content. Second, it was found that there were significant differences between importance and performance in the four areas of content components: learning content, teaching-learning strategy, interaction, and evaluation. The importance-execution analysis (IPA) was conducted in two dimensions: region-specific and item-specific, and the results are as follows. The learning content was found to be the maintenance area, the teaching-learning strategy and interaction were the key improvement areas, and the evaluation area was the overinvestment area. The results of this study can be used as basic data to diagnose the present of remote graduate school content and to gauge what needs to be improved in the future based on it.

• Journal of the Korean Society of Food Science and Nutrition
• /
• v.37 no.7
• /
• pp.942-952
• /
• 2008

The purpose of this research was to evaluate the quality of take-out services at restaurants in Chungbuk Province. A questionnaire survey by 450 customers who had experience in take-out service at the restaurants was conducted and 378 completed questionnaires were available for statistical evaluation. Statistical analyses were made of raw data by SAS V8.2. The scale for analyzing the importance and performance of the service quality was composed of 5-point Likert scales. The main results of this study are as follow: The quality attributes of take-out service were rearranged into four factors in terms of food, sanitation, access and service. The importance score was higher than performance score. IPA showed that 'freshness of food material', 'cleanliness and hygiene in food', 'sanitation of facilities', 'neatness of employees' and 'price in food' was included in 'focus here' area. There was significantly positive correlation between factors such as food, sanitation, access, service and overall customer satisfaction (p<.001); between factors and repurchasing intentions (p<.001); and between customer satisfaction and repurchasing intentions (p<.001). According to multiple regression analysis, 26.27% of the variance in respondents' overall satisfaction score and 9.21% of the variance in respondents' repurchasing intention score could be explained by factors such as food, sanitation, access and service.

• Journal of the Korean Society of Food Science and Nutrition
• /
• v.43 no.11
• /
• pp.1757-1765
• /
• 2014

The objective of this study was to explore hygiene issues by analyzing the importance and performance of personal and school hygiene in school foodservices. Questionnaires were administered to 634 students (10 high schools) in the Busan area. Exactly 29% of respondents had received hygiene education. The average score of importance of students' personal foodservice hygiene was 3.81/5.00, and the performance score was 3.48/5.00. The same scores for school foodservice hygiene were 4.37/5.00 and 3.67/5.00, respectively. Regarding importance and performance of personal foodservice hygiene, students who had received hygiene education showed significantly (P<0.01) higher scores than those without prior education. In terms of importance of school foodservice hygiene, students who had received hygiene education showed significantly higher scores for environment hygiene (P<0.05) and equipment hygiene (P<0.05). Additionally, among grid analysis in personal foodservice hygiene, the areas of high importance and low performance included 'washing hands before the meal', 'using a designated cup for the water purifier', and 'keeping clean around the leftover container'. As for school foodservice hygiene, the same area was 'cleanliness of tray'. These findings suggest that hygiene education needs to be extended to more students, and for school foodservice hygiene, a cleaner environment should be created using equipment hygiene management, including emphasis on ensuring cleanliness of tray.

• Journal of the Korean Society for information Management
• /
• v.25 no.3
• /
• pp.83-97
• /
• 2008

This thesis presents the methods and tool development of performance assessment as final stage for information literacy instruction of teacher-librarians. The evaluation is an important part in information literacy instruction of teacher-librarians in the school libraries. But until now, there is little research on evaluation methodologies in the instructional activities of teacher-librarians. There is only evaluation domain presented in the primary and secondary 'Information and the Library' curriculum. To develop an evaluation model as a base for measuring performance assessment related to teacher-librarians is important. The goal of this thesis is to provide teacher-librarians with basic principles to develop many kinds of performance assessment tools in their own instructional activities.

• 한국신재생에너지학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 2009.11a
• /
• pp.302-302
• /
• 2009

미국 DOE(Department of energy) 산하 EERE(the office of energy efficiency and renewable energy)에서는 시행되고 있는 일반 프로그램 평가(General Program Evaluation) 중 하나인 과정 평가(Process Evaluation)는 프로그램의 수행의 효율성과 유효성을 평가하기 위해 수행된다. EERE에서는 프로그램 별로 매 2~3년에 한번, 프로그램의 진행에 장애요인을 시행하기 위해 부정기적으로 과정평가를 수행하여 프로그램의 진행과정을 개선할 것을 제안하고 있다. 과정평가의 방법론으로는 사례연구(case study), 내용분석(content analysis), 메타평가(meta evaluation), 델파이분석(delphi-analysis), 외부 동료평가(peer review) 등의 방법론이 사용될 수 있다. 특히, EERE는 "Peer Review Guide(2004)"을 발간하여 과정평가에서 있어 외부 동료평가의 방법론을 정리하였다. 과정평가를 통해 프로그램 수행결과의 중간점검과 동시에 프로그램의 발전을 위하 전문가의 제언을 수집할 수 있다. 따라서 과정평가의 결과는 프로그램의 개선에 도움을 줄 수 있으며, 장기 과제인 경우 프로그램 관리에 효과적으로 사용될 수 있다. 우리나라의 경우, 사업 수행 시 '진도보고'나 '중간결과 발표' 등을 통하여 동일한 내용의 평가를 시행하고 있으나, 평가의 항목.시기.예산 등에 대한 지침(guideline)이 구축되었다고 볼 수 없는 상황이다. 한국의 신재생에너지 보급사업은 국가적인 중요도, 투입예산의 규모 및 수행기간 등을 고려할 때 과정평가를 통해 정기적으로 사업의 진행과정을 점검할 필요가 있다 하겠다. 따라서 신재생에너지 분야의 사업의 관리에 적용될 수 있는 EERE의 과정평가를 한국의 상황에 맞게 수정하고 이를 정규적으로 시행하는 방안에 대한 논의가 필요하다 하겠다.

• Journal of Korean Society of Transportation
• /
• v.15 no.2
• /
• pp.35-48
• /
• 1997

항법장치 인간-기계 인터페이스(HUMAN-Machine Interface)는 운전자의 편안함과 안전, 수행도 및 시스템의 사용성, 도로, 안전의 향상 등을 위한 중요한 요소로 인식되고 있 다. 그러므로 항법장치 인간-기계 인터페이스 체계가 운전자와 교통에 미치는 영향은 직접 적인 항법장치의 시장성 확보와 첨단교통체계의 전개와 성공에 영향을 미치는 중요한 기술 로 떠오르고 있으며, 특히 선진국의 인간-기계 인터페이스 표준의 연구 및 제정의 노력으로 인해 항법장치의 인간-기계 인터페이스 설계 및 평가를 위한 가이드라인과 효율적인 평가 방법의 개발이며, 이들의 데이터베이스화 역시 설계 및 평가 효율향상을 위한 기본적으로 중요하게 여겨지는 연구과제이다. 본 논문은 기존 항법장치 인간공학적 평가 방법들의 비교 평가를 통해서 적합한 항법장치의 평가방법론과 추출된 항법장치 인간-기계 인터페이스 설 계 변수를 제시하며, 이들을 가이드라인화하여 데이터베이스화 할 수 있도록 설계된 Navi HEGS(Navigation HMI Evaluation & Guideline System)에 대하여 기술한다. 또한 실험을 통하여 본 논문에서 제시된 주관적 평가 방법인 RNASA-TLX(Revision of NASA-Task Load Index)와 운전자의 시각분석의 결과를 본 시스템을 사용하여 분석 제시하며, 이들을 통해 국내 항법장치 인간-기계 인터페이스 연구의 기반을 제시하고자 한다.

• The Journal of the Korea Contents Association
• /
• v.2 no.2
• /
• pp.53-63
• /
• 2002

As the microelectronics technology is developed, new types d smart intelligent produce are being emerged. OSD user interface is one of the critical factor in this kind of product, especially brown goods and information devices, as it is responsible for input and output function. OSD is being treated as accompaniment to hardware in spite of its importance, and therefore is developed from only simple and separate usability testing based on performance measurement. This study propose a usability evaluation method of OSD based on subjective preference to support existing usability testing. The purpose of this analysis is to make dear what is important factor and how its preference level is from the user's viewpoint. The various attributes of OSD are clarified from user's questionaire and interview, and orthogonal array is generated with specifed factor levels. The prototypes are generated from rapid prototyping tool and tested in natural simulation environment. The preference data which collected in this usability testing is analyzed with conjoint analysis module. This usability evaluation is not the final stage in user interface design process but the early famed and circulated stage.