• Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health
• /
• v.31 no.2 s.61
• /
• pp.310-322
• /
• 1998

In order to reinforce the role of primary care physician and o improve doctor-patient relationship, the Korean government tried to introduce 'Family Doctor Registration Program' into Seocho-Gu in Seoul, Ansung-Gun and Paju city in Kyunggi-Do in Oct. 1996. Community residents and doctors in those area did not show much interest in this project because of low incentives. We have done this study to see how much people know 'Family Doctor Registration Program' and what is people's real needs about 'Family Doctor Registration Program'. We selected 1,800 telephone numbers in Seoul, Chongju city, and Ansung-Gun by multi-stage stratified random sampling. Three trained survey personnels called them and got answers to the premade questionnaire until they completed the questionnaires of 200 persons in each community. The calling time was 7-9 p.m. from Monday to Friday, 3-9 p.m. on Saturday, and 9 a.m. to 9 p.m. on Sunday. We dropped out the persons who did not respond 3 times. The subjects consisted of 222 male and 367 female residents. Their ages ranged from 20 to 78: 24.8% in their 30s, 23.4% in their 20s, 22.5% in their 40s in male, and 35.2% in theirs, 22.5% in their 40s, 18.5% in their 20s in female. 9.9% of male and 13.2 % of female had their Family Doctors. The specialties of their Family Doctors were internists in 56.2%, general surgeons in 11.0%. The persons who did not have their family doctors were asked which doctors they would prefer if they had choices of family doctor. The results were internists in 50.3%, family physicians in 13.0%, pediatricians in 4.8%. Only 16.0% residents knew that government tried to introduce Family Doctor Registration Program. The 'Family Doctor Registration Program' was not well known to people. The results of our study showed that more effective incentives and public notifications are needed to activate this program.

• 월간산업보건
• /
• s.172
• /
• pp.13-16
• /
• 2002

• 월간산업보건
• /
• s.171
• /
• pp.4-8
• /
• 2002

• 월간산업보건
• /
• s.171
• /
• pp.9-12
• /
• 2002

• 월간산업보건
• /
• s.171
• /
• pp.13-23
• /
• 2002

• 월간산업보건
• /
• s.171
• /
• pp.24-36
• /
• 2002

• The Science & Technology
• /
• no.7 s.410
• /
• pp.114-116
• /
• 2003

• Proceedings of the Korean Information Science Society Conference
• /
• 2011.06a
• /
• pp.146-149
• /
• 2011

최근에 우리 사회는 급격히 증가하는 만성질환으로 위기에 처해있다. 진보된 의료기술도 여전히 만성 질환을 완벽히 진료해 주지 못하고 있다. 현대 사회의 많은 사람들은 긴 수명을 보장받는 대신에 만성질환 장애를 가지게 되었고 비싼 의료 비용은 심각한사회 문제로 대두되고 있다. IT가 발달함에 따라 병원 중심의 치료서비스에서 개인과 주치의가 상호 긴밀하게 협력하여 질병의 예방, 관리, 건강증진 등을 제공하는 u-Healthcare 시스템이 빠르게 발전하고 있다. u-Healthcare 시스템은 개인 건강 기기로부터 측정된 생체 정보 데이터가 병원과 주치의에게 전달되어 언제 어디서나 검사 및 피드백이 가능하도록 하는 것이 목적이다. 본 논문에서는 유헬스케어 시스템에 발 맞추어 스마트 폰 기반의 만성질환자를 위한 u-DailyCare 시스템의 설계한다. 스마트폰 사용자로부터 얻어진 행위 데이터 및 생체 정보 데이터를 수집하여 서버에 보내면, 이 정보들을 바탕으로 주치의 혹은 병원에서 실시간으로 데이터를 분석하여 피드백을 준다. 본 논문의 특징으로는 키넥트 카메라와 신체 활동을 측정하는 MET 단위를 사용하여 정확한 행위 데이터 측정과 분석에 도움을 주었다. 이로써 주치의는 환자에게 좀더 정확하고 정교한 피드백을 전달할 수 있다.

• Proceedings of the Korea Information Processing Society Conference
• /
• 2017.11a
• /
• pp.1176-1178
• /
• 2017

영상, 음성, 환자의 가정용 의료기기, 라즈베리파이를 이용하여 라즈베리파이 7인치 터치스크린과 카메라로 사용자의 의료진과 영상통화를 할 수 있고, 환자의 의료기기 측정을 하여 의료진과 언제 어디서든 피드백을 주고받을 수 있으며 Application을 통한 환자는 주치의, 보호자, 긴급호출 119로 자신의 위급함을 알릴 수 있으며 주치의는 환자목록[이름, 나이, 성별, 주소, 환자에 대한 정보(평소 지병, 복용중인 약)]환자의 상태 등을 관리 하며 긴급 상황 발생 시 사용자의 위치를 추적하여 지도로 표시해주며 주치의는 구급대원과 의사소통을 할 수 있는 헬스 케어이다.

• Journal of Korean society of Dental Hygiene
• /
• v.23 no.6
• /
• pp.431-439
• /
• 2023

Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate the essential services, importance, interval of examinations, and role of dental hygienists in children's family dentistry program. Methods: A total of 124 participants completed a self-administered questionnaire. The data were analyzed using independent t-test, and ANOVA, and Pearson correlation analysis. Results: All participants stated that oral examination and panoramic radiography are required; children should be educated about brushing, use of oral products, and regular check-ups; and preventive treatments such as molar sealants and prophylaxis should be offered. They stated that light-curing resins and glass ionomer fillings should be offered in treatment services. They stated that examination intervals should be shorter for education and prevention rather than treatment. Dental hygiene students were more likely than dentists and dental hygienists to say that the program was more important. There was a correlation between oral examinations and education and treatment, and between essential services and their importance. Conclusions: Services considered essential and important should be provided first, education and prevention should be provided more frequently than treatment, and their importance should be emphasized not only to dental hygiene students but also to dental hygienists and dentists who are the main providers of services.