• 대학교육
• /
• s.24
• /
• pp.136-143
• /
• 1986

• 대학교육
• /
• s.10
• /
• pp.87-91
• /
• 1984

• 대학교육
• /
• s.45
• /
• pp.81-91
• /
• 1990

• 대학교육
• /
• s.37
• /
• pp.109-112
• /
• 1989

• 대학교육
• /
• s.18
• /
• pp.65-70
• /
• 1985

• 대학교육
• /
• s.26
• /
• pp.126-130
• /
• 1987

• Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society
• /
• v.54 no.4
• /
• pp.415-436
• /
• 2023

In this study, we aimed to examine the level of implementation of the second comprehensive plan for promoting academic libraries (2019-2023) by analyzing key statistics of academic libraries and gathering perceptions from library staff. We analyzed the changes in major statistical indicators of libraries over the past five years. Additionally, we surveyed library staff to understand their overall perceptions of the plan and their attitudes towards the 17 sub-tasks outlined in it. The analysis of 369 survey responses revealed several key findings. Firstly, most respondents comprehended the plan well and frequently utilized it for developing their libraries' development and implementation plans. Secondly, the IPA results indicated that regardless of the type of university, there should be a continuous focus on facility improvement, teaching-learning support, and expanding access to academic resources. Efforts to develop library policies and strengthen human and financial resources were identified as crucial. Thirdly, four-year universities particularly emphasized the importance of expanding access to international academic resources compared to junior colleges. Conversely, junior colleges perceived foundational skill-building programs and inclusive services as more significant than four-year universities. The application of the IPA diagonal model revealed that the performance levels of all sub-tasks were lower than their perceived importance levels, suggesting the need for strategies to enhance effectiveness in future comprehensive plan formulation.

• Proceedings of the Korea Information Processing Society Conference
• /
• 2012.11a
• /
• pp.1615-1618
• /
• 2012

대학은 교육개선을 통하여 교육 수요자인 학생에게 질 좋은 교육을 제공함으로서 교육 만족도를 높일 수 있으며, 대학 경쟁력을 강화시킬 수 있다. 본 논문에서는 교육개선의 일환으로 2010년부터 시행중인 전문대학교 공학기술교육인증(ETAC) 컴퓨터공학기술 분야에서 필수 이수 교과목인 종합설계의 대학별 운영 사례 비교 분석을 통하여 졸업생역량(PO)의 산학연계형 평가 방안을 제시하였다. 연구 결과, 종합설계 교과목 운영시 담당교수 이외에 산업체 인사가 참여하는 다면평가 방법과 더 나아가 종합설계 교과목 수업 운영으로 현장 실무자가 포함된 팀티칭 방법을 제안한다.

• Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society
• /
• v.10 no.2
• /
• pp.310-333
• /
• 2007

This paper introduces a relative comparative advantage index and a composite concentration index of university research activity in science and technology. Three hypotheses were tested regarding differences of degree of concentration based on the size of government R&D fund, location of university, and source of foundation, respectively. T-test results imply that there are significant differences of concentration based on the size of R&D fund and source of foundation, while location of university does not show a significant difference. The paper generally suggests that the lesser size of government R&D fund would lead higher level of concentration, and public funded universities tend to maintain far higher concentration ratio. The paper contributes by introducing relevant indexes for analyzing university research competence, concentration and competitiveness, and hence by proposing policy direction and implication for university competitiveness policy.

• Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science
• /
• v.30 no.1
• /
• pp.19-34
• /
• 1996

This study provides an overview of the accreditation landscape in Korea, and identifies some problems in the current accrediting review program which assesses the library's achievements These are as follows: (1) The weight given to the library sector is insufficient. (2) There are no indicators to appraise the achiement of the informational and educational functions of academic libraries (3) It is completely devoted to input indicators, but not process or output indicators (4) It is impossible to evaluate the quality os library services. (5) The units of statistics are not standardised. Some alternative measures and indicators are proposed to evaluate the performances of academic libraries' services. It is suggested that an official draft should be prepared by Korean academic librarians to amend the library sector of current accrediting review program.