• Title/Summary/Keyword: 조습제

Search Result 3, Processing Time 0.014 seconds

Analysis of Dynamic Humidity Control Characteristics of Museum Showcase with Adsorption Material (조습제 적용 박물관 전시케이스의 동적 습도조절 특성 해석)

  • 김재용;오명도
    • Korean Journal of Air-Conditioning and Refrigeration Engineering
    • /
    • v.15 no.12
    • /
    • pp.1070-1077
    • /
    • 2003
  • This study was undertaken to judge the quality of air-tightened exhibition cases and to predict the dynamic variation of the relative humidity in the showcase. We performed a lot of experiments for the a few conditions and we numerically calculated the air change rate and the relative humidity in the showcase with the Artsorb under the same conditions. In all cases we confirmed that the numerical results about the relative humidity in the showcase had a good agreement with the experimental ones. Through the experiments of humidity control, we found out that the adsorption efficiency is varied with the location and the amount of the Artsorb. And the numerical results showed that the adsorption material is always needed to keep on the appropriate humidity condition in the showcase even though any kind of the showcases are used.

The Effects of Humidity Control Capability and Removal Toxic Gases of Activated Carbon to the Display Environment of Cultural Properties (문화재 전시 공간에 대한 활성탄의 습도 제어 및 유해가스 제거 효과 연구)

  • Kang, Sae Rom;Choi, Yu Ri;Kang, Dai Ill
    • Journal of Conservation Science
    • /
    • v.30 no.2
    • /
    • pp.235-241
    • /
    • 2014
  • In this study, we are trying to verify humidity control capability of the exhibition environment of cultural property by measuring adsorption and desorption performance, the control ability of harmful substances by the adsorption experiments of harmful gases. In the experiment of adsorption and desorption performance, in the low humidity area, Artsorb desorbed overwhelmingly more than activated carbon whereas activated carbon absorbed more. Adsorption speed was faster slightly in Artsorb absorption speed was similar in both. In the middle humidity area, absorption by artsorb was slightly more and desorption was similar in both so characteristic of Artsorb didn't appear. Also, Adsorption speed was faster in activated carbon but in the process of desorption, the speed of Artsorb was faster. In adsorption experiment of harmful substances, the concentration in the environment with activated carbon was lower than one with Artsorb, but the difference appeared small. And as a result of observation of the difference in concentration due to adsorption of harmful gas by the change in the metal specimen, the most change was shown in lead specimen and the color difference between the lead specimens of the activated carbon and Artsorb appeared greatly.

Air-tightness Test by Silicagel on Museum Cases (조습제(燥濕濟)(Art-Sorb)를 이용한 벽부형진열장(壁附形陳列欌) 밀폐도(密閉度) 간접측정(間接測淀))

  • Yu, Hei-sun;Kim, Myoung-nam;Lee, Sung-eun
    • Conservation Science in Museum
    • /
    • v.3
    • /
    • pp.71-78
    • /
    • 2001
  • The airtightness of museum cases in museums was measured by using CO2 tracing gas, but it has been pointed that it has a problem with measuring the airtightness of a museum case which has a hole inside before it is used or while is being used. So studies tried to come up with alternatives which make it possible to measure the airtightness of a museum case before it is used or while it is being used if necessary by indirectly measuring the airtightness of the museum case without changing its form. Indirect measuring is done by measuring the change of Art-sorb weight and the change of temperature and humidity inside the museum case. Experiments were made for 12 days with three builtin wall case installed at the same place without turning on the lights but with Art-sorb and the data logger of temperature and humidity put into museum case. The change rate was produced with the change of temperature and humidity inside the museum case divided by that of those around museum case. As a result, the temperature change rate of museum case A(0.67) was lower than that of museum case B(0.69) or museum case C(0.79). The humidity change rate of museum case A(0.12) was lower than that of museum case B(0.19) or museum case C(0.72) showing that its airtightness was the best. Also in the direct airtightness measurement by CO2 tracing gas, the air exchange rate was compared with the humidity change rate by Art-sorb in the indirect measurement.