• Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society
• /
• 제12권3호
• /
• pp.662-686
• /
• 2009

Lately innovation is perceived as a systemic, horizontal phenomenon and requires a new governance for innovation. Subsequently, broader societal questions enter the domain of innovation policy and coordination and integration between innovation policy and various other policy domains, such as economic, educational, social, regional and environmental policies become crucial. Definitions of policy integration include terms such as coherence, cooperation, coordination and put great emphasis on joint working to promote synergies among policies and reduce duplication and the use of the same goals to formulate policy. As innovation capabilities of the private sector have improved and it has become unclear who to catch up with, the Korean government, a leading player in the process of "catch-up," is likely to have more difficulties in maintaining the old way of planning and executing policies. The Korean government is now under the pressure of planning technologies and policies that do not allow any easy imitation or copy of other advanced countries longer, which in turn reveals various limits of the existing policy framework. Policy integration involves a continual process demanding changes in political, organizational and procedural activities. To ensure long term and cross sectoral innovation policy, overall change and improvement in policy and its implementation needed in terms of political commitments, governance systems, policy instruments and monitoring, and evaluation systems.

• Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship
• /
• 제6권4호
• /
• pp.153-171
• /
• 2011

The welfare system and the direction of the welfare policy have been unable to escape greatly from the frame of the past against the facts that the external environments of the national economy of the world including Korea have been changing in quick and rapid speed. Such results have caused the issues related with the welfare, economy and society ended in the ideological collision in connection with the goals of the policy, the right agreement between the policies lacked, and the intervention and conflict between the interest group concerning the policy continued. Social policy of Korea in the past had the level of complementing the parts which could not be solved through the growth. Employment creation had been achieved continuously backed up by the high rate of growth. And the low aging level, the young population structure, and the high rate of childbirth had been the structures that made such achievement possible. New economic, social and welfare environment at home and abroad has been requesting new change in welfare policy. Goal of the economic and social policy is to construct the safe economic and social system. And what has been requested has been the formation of the economic and social policy orienting the welfare nation in form of social investment and welfare expansion. Also the direction in strengthening the welfare system of Korea shall have the balance between the protection and activation strength with the necessity of converting to the prevention welfare from the post welfare. Also the public part, market, the 3rd sector and the share of the role of an individual shall be achieved. And what is needed is the achievement of the transfer from the paradigm of residual welfare to the universal welfare. And such improvements of the welfare system will be able to elevate the possible continuity of the system in long term basis through the improvement of the welfare system.

• 한국사회정책
• /
• 제20권2호
• /
• pp.69-96
• /
• 2013

This paper is to critically review the economic reasoning of non-sustainability of welfare state due to its intrinsic incentive problems and to see how the nordic welfare state responds to them. The welfare state as a political design of state to pursue equality has social insurance as its main economic function. It survives market failure of private insurance to contribute to human capital investment and industrial restructuring. The universal tax-financed welfare state, however, has the problem of tragedy of commons such as reduced work incentive and work ethics. But, the existing nordic welfare state overcomes it through employment-focused policy arrangements, maintenance of work ethics and benefits moral, incentive mechanism of wage-compression, public educational investment and its complementation with social security. The Nordic model shows that problems of incentive and moral are not about those of theory and reasoning, but about their reality which policies and institutions could respond to.

• Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society
• /
• 제10권3호
• /
• pp.555-579
• /
• 2007

This study analysed theory and application of holistic innovation policy in the 3rd generation innovation policy with cases of Finland and Korea. Innovation policy areas of both countries are expanding from simple goal of economic development to extensive goals such as sustainable development, quality of life, balanced growth etc. Also administrative system changed in order to let technical innovation on the center of national operation and reorganized relation and structure of relative policies like manpower, education, region policy. Particularly, Korea is in embryo standing for S&T driven society since Noh's government. But, there are differences in embodiment degree and feature between both countries. Finland reinvigorate field of public opinion due to corporatism tradition as a Scandinavian institution. Government support system developed co-program and co-policy beyond territory of individual ministry to raise policy effectiveness. However, concept of the Korean innovation policy is ahead of the times but maintained framework of developing country. And there is no active participation of private sector and civil society because transition process accomplished on the top-down method, It could hardly progress toward transition in spite of various efforts to carry out a reform.

• Proceedings of the Korea Water Resources Association Conference
• /
• 한국수자원학회 2016년도 학술발표회
• /
• pp.129-129
• /
• 2016

기후변화의 영향으로 인한 자연재해의 대규모화에 따라 가뭄재해가 농촌지역에 중대한 피해를 끼칠 수 있는 여지가 확대되고 있다. 그러나 4대강 살리기 사업으로 인하여 대하천의 정비가 강화되었지만 농촌지역 주변의 중소하천은 여전히 기후변화에 취약한 현실이다. 농촌지역의 가뭄재해에 대하여 국가 및 지방자치단체, 공공기관이 효과적으로 대처하기 위해서는 농촌의 특성을 충분히 고려한 대응책을 마련하는 것이 중요하며, 이에 본 연구에서는 "자연재해대책법 시행규칙" 및 "재난 및 안전관리 기본법 시행령", 그리고 "농어업재해대책법 시행규칙"에 있어서 가뭄관련 조항의 개정을 제안하였다. "자연재해대책법" 제2장(자연재해의 예방 및 대비)에서는 풍수해(제2절), 설해(제4절) 에 이어 가뭄에 대한 예방 및 대비를 규정(제5절 29조-33조)하고 있다. 제29조는 가뭄방재를 위하여 필요한 조사 및 연구를 수행하여야 함을 규정하고 있는데, 여기서 '필요한' 조사 및 연구는 시행령 혹은 시행규칙 등을 통해 명확히 할 필요가 있으며, 제30조는 가뭄재해 극복을 위해 제한 급수 및 제한 발전 등의 조치를 취할 수 있다고 규정하고 있으나, 조치를 취함으로써 발생하는 손해 배상 규정의 삽입이 필요하다. "재난 및 안전관리 기본법" 제8조(다른 법률과의 관계 등) 2호에서 제3조1호 가목의 규정에 해당하는 재난(가뭄 포함)의 예방 복구 등에 관해서는 '자연재해대책법'이 정한 바에 따르도록 규정하고 있기는 하지만, 자연재해로 인한 재난에 대해서는 소극적 규정으로 판단된다. 그리고, 제4장(재난의 예방)에 있어서 재난은 제3조1호의 가목(자연현상으로 발생하는 재해), 나목(사회적 재해), 다목(국가기반체계와 관련된 재해) 각각의 경우에 따른 예방대책의 수립이 필요하다. 각 조항의 개정은 농촌지역 가뭄재해에 대한 정책활용을 염두에 두고 개정안을 제시하지만, 법령 자체의 목적 및 타법과의 정합성 등 대한민국 법체제의 통일성 및 안정성을 최대한 반영하였다. 해당 조항의 개정으로 농촌 및 농업지역의 특성을 반영한 다양한 가뭄대응 정책의 활용을 도모하고 가뭄재해로부터 안전한 영농환경이 구축될 수 있을 것이 기대된다.

• Proceedings of the Korean Statistical Society Conference
• /
• 한국통계학회 2005년도 춘계 학술발표회 논문집
• /
• pp.65-71
• /
• 2005

지역소득통계는 경제${\cdot}$사회${\cdot}$복지의 종합적인 지역정책 수립을 위한 핵심 자료로 이용되고 있다. 지역소득통계의 수준을 보다 높이기 위해서는 현재 작성하고 있는 생산 및 지출측면의 지역소득통계 뿐만 아니라 분배측면의 소득에 대한 통계도 함께 조속히 작성되어야 한다. 국민소득통계는 한국은행에서 작성하고 있으나 16개 시도별 지역내총생산(GRDP)통계는 통계청에서 별도 추계하여 작성하고 있다. 이에 지역내총생산(GRDP)과 국내총생산(GDP)의 상호간 차이를 최소화하기 위하여는 유기적인 협력관계가 필요하다. 또한 기초자치단체(시군구)별 지역내총생산(GRDP)통계는 시도에서 작성하고 있다. 현재 6개 시도에서 작성되고 있는 기초자치단체별GRDP의 작성 확산을 위한 노력과 아울러 이들 자료와 통계청에서 작성한 시도별 GRDP자료와의 정합성 유지방안에 대한 대책도 요구되고 있다.

• Journal of Cadastre & Land InformatiX
• /
• 제45권1호
• /
• pp.1-15
• /
• 2015

Korea's Spatial Information Policy has been institutionalized based by "National Spatial Data Infrastructure Act", "Act on Land Survey, Waterway Survey and Cadastral Records", "Spatial Data Industry Promotion Act". In year 2015, These acts were modified with new names and contents. It is critical that the definition of spatial information ought to be generalized. In addition, it is of paramount importance to review factors those contribute to the systematic development on coherent relation between Spatial Information Act and other acts. Examples of improvement area may include: Categorization of Spatial Information Concept, Systematization of Spatial Data Related Legislation, and Enhancement of Organization Specializing in Spatial Information. Furthermore, Legislation & Policy case of Germany, France and the United States were used as a basis for improvement.

• Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society
• /
• 제11권3호
• /
• pp.352-375
• /
• 2008

Recently policy coordination and integration have emerged as core challenges as complexity and uncertainty of policy. Especially as innovation and environment policy is expanding and its position is being further elevated within policy hierarchy, policy integration has emerged as core governance challenges for nation states. OECD countries emphasized the need of coordination and integration of policy by introducing concepts such as 'Environmental Policy Integration', 'the Third generation innovation policy', 'integrated innovation policy'. This study analysed the background, concepts, objects, mechanisms, and major issues of integrated innovation policy and various attempts for integrate innovation policy by policy level and cycle. Developing integrated innovation policies has become increasingly important for the EU and OECD countries in recent years. OECD countries including Finland have developed broader policy agendas for balancing policy objectives and aims of other policy sectors and horizontal relationships with other policy sectors. Policy integration helps to reorient policies where related policies are in conflict and to ensure coherence across different policy areas. Policy integration emphasizes long-term policy adjustment and adaptation based on social agreement and common vision.

• Journal of Convergence for Information Technology
• /
• 제9권5호
• /
• pp.201-209
• /
• 2019

The purpose of this study is to analyze whether parents with developmental disabilities are well represented by the persons with developmental disabilities. Analysis data is based on the data from the Survey on Disability Survey in 2014. We analyzed the consistency and biases of the parent's proxy respondents' opinions by the degree of agreement between the contents of the person with developmental disabilities and the value of items that the parents answered on behalf of the development disabled. First, the parents' proxy respondents responded well to the actual situation such as life satisfaction for the developmental disabled, while the parental proxy respondents showed the positive bias to overestimate the cost items and the negative bias to recognize the discrimination. Second, in relation to independent living, the majority of the parents of the developmental disabled respondents had a high agreement with the developmental disabled person. However, about 5 ~ 10% of the parents' proxy respondents seem to have a tendency to distort the independent living policy by preferring non-standard housing types, unlike those with developmental disabilities. Based on this, it was proposed that the respondents should be able to receive the answers of the possible parties in the future research on desire and independent living related intention toward the developmental disabled, and the research on the matching of the proxy response is needed in a multidimensional manner.

• Proceedings of the Korea Technology Innovation Society Conference
• /
• 한국기술혁신학회 2017년도 추계학술대회 논문집
• /
• pp.49-79
• /
• 2017

본 연구는 2011년 "원자력안전법" 제정 사례에 있어 정책의제 설정 과정을 동태적으로 이해하기 위해 다중흐름모형을 활용하여 분석을 수행하였다. 연구범위는 이명박 정부와 제18대 국회임기가 겹치는 기간인 2009년부터 2011년 간 기간으로서, 동 기간은 UAE 원전수출과 후쿠시마 원전사고라는 정 반대의 초점사건이 발생하면서 두 차례 의제설정 여부를 결정하는 정책의 창이 개방되었다. 분석결과, 문제의 흐름 영역에서는 정부의 원자력 정책에 있어 진흥과 규제기능을 별도 법령으로 분리하고 독립된 예산 및 전담조직을 구성하는 체계를 구축해야 한다는 문제는 장기간 존재해왔다. 1990년대부터 소수의 법학자들을 중심으로 문제인식과 대안제시가 이뤄지는 정책의 흐름이 발전되어 왔는데, 이후 UAE 원전수출 이후 2010년에 이르러서야 본격적으로 표출집단인 관료와 국회의원을 통해 구체적 대안이 제시되었고, 2011년 후쿠시마 원전사고 직후인 5월 원자력안전법이 제정되었다. 분석결과, 2009년 UAE원전수출 이후, 수출 확대 목적으로 제시된 원자력 규제 독립 법안이 통과되지 못했던 것에 반해, 2011년 후쿠시마 이후 원자력안전법이 통과 된 이유는 대안의 가치정합성, 사회여론, 정치환경 등 정치의 흐름이 크게 작용한 것으로 분석되었다.