• Cross-Cultural Studies
• /
• v.52
• /
• pp.111-132
• /
• 2018

The way of approaching 'the relationship between love and justice' varies from person to person. We can argue for superiority of love or for superiority of justice by understanding the relationship between the two as conflicting. We can also argue that we need each other by understanding each other as a complementary relationship rather than an oppositional relationship. Hegel, however, sees love and justice as independent constitutive principles valid in different areas and does not regard the two as opposing nor complementary. This can only be understood when the structure of Hegel's theory of recognition is properly assumed. The relationship between love and justice will be considered mainly in Hegel's theory of recognition. Key philosophical points of Hegel's theory of recognition and consequences drawn on the relationship between love and justice on the basis of the theory will be examined. This can be summarized in the form of a thesis, roughly as follows. - Hegel presents love, justice and solidarity, that are various forms of recognition, to a family, a civil society and a state, that are three forms of social relations, as their constitutive principles. He does not grasp the relationship between love and justice as oppositional nor as complementary, that is different from many people's general perspective on the relationship of the two. - In Hegel's theory of recognition, love and justice differ in the areas in which they are valid. Love is a valid principle in the intimacy, and justice is a valid principle in non-intimacy. So, if justice and rights are asserted in intimacy, the area of intimacy is destroyed. Conversely, if love is asserted in non-intimacy, it cannot exercise real influence. - In the political community such as a state, where intimacy and non-intimacy overlap each other, the principle of solidarity is needed as a new constitutive principle, since a state does not stand on the principle of love as in a family nor on the principle of justice as in a civil society.

• 대학교육
• /
• s.37
• /
• pp.117-119
• /
• 1989

• Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics
• /
• v.20 no.4
• /
• pp.529-546
• /
• 2010

This study aims to analyze and criticize the definition of the similarity concept in mathematical texts by investigating mathematical history. At first, we analyzed the definition of Pythagoras, the definition of Euclid's ${\ll}$Elements${\gg}$, the definition of Clairaut's ${\ll}$Elements of geometry${\gg}$, the postulate of Brkhoff's postulates for plane geometry, the definition of Birkhoff & Beatly의 ${\ll}$Basic Geometry${\gg}$. the definition of SMSG ${\ll}$Geometry${\gg}$. and the definition of the similarity concept in current mathematics texts. Then we criticized the definition of the similarity concept in current mathematics texts based on mathematical history. We critically discussed three issues and gave three suggestions.

• Cross-Cultural Studies
• /
• v.52
• /
• pp.53-78
• /
• 2018

In the moral culture of the West, love and justice are two commands with roots in ancient times. One is the heritage of Hebraism, and the other belongs to the tradition of Hebraism and Hellenism. The two concepts are the most important virtues required for preserving stability in society. These two commands are compatible, in an exclusive relationship to each other. To ultimately seek their reconciliation, the precise concept analysis and understanding of each of them should be premised on, due to the multi-layered meaning of implications of the two concepts. To this end, we first have started with a lexical meaning and have done a conceptual analysis of what these two concepts are expressing. We have looked at Paul $Ric{\oe}ur$ in his interpretation of the discourse of love and justice. Finally, we looked at how these two concepts are narrated in literature. Through the literary works of Stendal, Albert Camus, and Dostoevsky, we have seen examples of literary configurations that have been embodied in life. In this way, through conceptual analysis, discourse analysis, and narrative analysis of the two concepts, the following conclusions were drawn. Love and justice were not a matter of choice. We could see coldness and unrealism of a society lacking love or with a problem of unclean love, through Stendhal's and Albert Camus' novels and their actual debate. In addition, in unclean paternalism, risk of the power of love blocking certain a certain touch of justice was also confirmed. So, it was necessary for a healthy future society to explore the possibility of the coexistence of love and justice. We confirmed the possibility of compatibility in a 'considerate balance' wherein the 'moral judgment in situation' is required, as Paul $Ric{\oe}ur$ expressed. This ideal situation may be realized when forms of love involving solidarity, mutual care, and compassion with pain like Dostoevsky are combined with the principle of distributional justice. When Albert Camus pursued justice and eventually faced reality and mentioned the need for mercy, he could have made a moral judgment based on this situation. In the end, love protects justice, and justice contributes to the realization of love. Justice reduces super-ethical love to moral categories, and love plays a role in enabling justice to exert its full force.

• Proceedings of the Korea Water Resources Association Conference
• /
• 2012.05a
• /
• pp.371-371
• /
• 2012

연속된 강우 관측 자료로부터 강우사상을 분리하는 것은 수문 분석에서 매우 기초적인 부분이다. 하지만 이를 분리하는 표준적인 방법은 아직 정해진 것이 없다. 보편적으로 강우사상의 분리에 강우사상간 (무강우)시간정의(IETD; Inter-event Time Definition)을 사용하고 있으며, 이는 강우사상간 최소 (무강우)시간(MIT; Minimum Inter-event Time, 이하 '강우사상간 최소 무강우 시간' 이라고 함.)이라고도 한다. 강우사상간 최소 무강우 시간을 결정하기 위해 사용되는 방법으로는 자기 상관계수를 이용하는 방법과 순위상관계수를 이용하는 방법, 강우사상간 무강우시간에 대한 변동계수를 이용하는 방법, 연간 호우 발생수를 이용하는 방법 등이 있다. 본 연구에서는 한강수계 강우의 강우사상간 최소 무강우 시간을 고찰하기 위해 한강수계 국토해양부에서 운영 중인 한강수계 강우관측소의 자료를 대상으로 앞서 제시한 4가지 방법을 적용하여 각 방법 간의 차이를 비교하여 보았으며, 더불어 개별 강우관측소의 자료와 티센망을 이용한 유역평균강우량을 사용했을 때 강우사상간 최소 무강우 시간의 차이를 비교하여 보았다.

• Korean Architects
• /
• s.483
• /
• pp.45-70
• /
• 2009

건축이 최근 지식경제부의 영역으로 편입되면서, 건축은 새로운 국면을 맞게 되었다. 그간 국토해양부와 문화체육부 산하에서만 다루어지던 내용위에 지식이란 측면의 중요성이 추가로 얹어지게 되었다. 따라서 그간 문화 예술, 기술 산업분야로 정의되었던 건축이 지식분야를 포함하면서 건축의 본질적 정의에 많이 가까워진 것으로 판단된다.

• Korean Architects
• /
• no.8 s.126
• /
• pp.57-58
• /
• 1979

동력자원부는 현하 국제적 에너지 위기에 대처하여, 이를 슬기롭게 극복하고 더 나아가 새로운 에너지원의 개발 및 그 활용책으로 태양열주택의 설계ㆍ시공을 적극적으로 권장,실천하기 위한 초지로서 79년8월13일 태양열 주택의 정의를 확정하였으며 한국과학 기술연구소 부설 태양에너지 연구소에서는 태양의 집 추천 기준을 제정하였다. 그 주요 내용을 게재하면 다음과 같다.

• KOREAN POULTRY JOURNAL
• /
• v.55 no.2
• /
• pp.126-129
• /
• 2023

• Korean Architects
• /
• s.473
• /
• pp.96-99
• /
• 2008

• Korean Architects
• /
• no.9 s.341
• /
• pp.70-73
• /
• 1997