• Korea Information Processing Society Review
• /
• v.1 no.3
• /
• pp.71-79
• /
• 1994

• Korea Information Processing Society Review
• /
• v.4 no.6
• /
• pp.156-159
• /
• 1997

• Korea Information Processing Society Review
• /
• v.4 no.6
• /
• pp.114-123
• /
• 1997

• Review of KIISC
• /
• v.1 no.1
• /
• pp.83-93
• /
• 1991

• Korea Information Processing Society Review
• /
• v.8 no.5
• /
• pp.79-86
• /
• 2001

• KSCI Review
• /
• v.3 no.1
• /
• pp.47-64
• /
• 1996

• KSCI Review
• /
• v.14 no.1
• /
• pp.33-45
• /
• 2006

• Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science
• /
• v.37 no.4
• /
• pp.241-268
• /
• 2003

The purpose of this study is to analyze use patterns of archival terms and suggests the directions for their standardization. This present paper begins with analyzing translation patterns of fundamental terminology in the area of records and archives management and compares with corresponding Chinese and Japanese words. And some problems of essential terms are discussed in the light of standardization criteria which are adjusted to archival terms. Based on these analyses, it suggests directions for standardizing archival terms.

• Journal of the Korean Society for information Management
• /
• v.16 no.3
• /
• pp.137-158
• /
• 1999

This research dealt with author production, subject production, university production, core of the majoring subject production, the multi-authors production, authors majoring in their fields production, languages and periods production for the purpose of clarifying the general research pattern of us by using the method of content analysis of 767 items of monographic which have been published in Korea between 1957 and 1997. This study was done to apprehend the general research pattern of Library and Information Science.

• Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management
• /
• v.24 no.1
• /
• pp.73-88
• /
• 2024

This study discusses the process of forming discussions on information management in the field of records management and the need to expand information management functions that promote the utilization of records as information, focusing on the thought of records disposal in the digital era. Until now, records disposal has been recognized as a concept of physical destruction aimed at reducing the cost required for management and preservation through the reduction of large numbers of records. However, records disposal provides a starting point for discussions on information management in the field of records management. It forms the central axis for debate to strengthen the role of records management as information managers in the digital era. Therefore, this study examines the thought of records disposal in the paper age, analyzes the division of the function of records management and the process of developing into discussions on information management, and examines the controversy surrounding records disposal in the digital era. Furthermore, this study suggests the need to expand information management functions that promote the utilization of records as information.