• Journal of Digital Convergence
• /
• v.10 no.11
• /
• pp.279-285
• /
• 2012

This study classified the categorization process of convergence products as a rule-based and a similarity-based categorization process. And we examined that how the categorization process was determined according to information types(visual vs. visual + verbal) about the components of two prototypes before convergence and thinking styles(holistic vs. analytic). The result of this study showed: (1) The rule-based categorization process appeared more in case of visual information with verbal information than only visual information. (2) Analytic thinkers chose a rule-based categorization process more than holistic thinkers. These findings provide the theoretical and practical implications to comprehend the categorization process of convergence products and the judgement for consideration set from various convergence products.

• Journal of the Korean Home Economics Association
• /
• v.47 no.5
• /
• pp.23-34
• /
• 2009

The purpose of this study was to e${\times}$amine the effect of visual imagery stimulated by product information on consumer responses in online shopping conte${\times}$ts. Dual coding theory provided the theoretical framework of the study. The proposed model of the study was e${\times}$amined by conducting an e${\times}$periment using mock apparel websites with a between-subject factorial design: [2 (pictorial information: detailed views vs. no detailed views) ${\times}$ 2 (verbal information: detailed descriptions vs. abstract descriptions)]. A total of 439 female college students participated in the e${\times}$periment, and 433 responses were ultimately used to test the hypotheses. The findings from the results revealed: (1) the main effects of the pictorial and verbal information on visual imagery, and (2) positive relationships between (a) visual imagery and mood, (b) visual imagery and perceived product quality, (c) mood and perceived product quality, and (d) perceived quality and purchase intentions.

• The Journal of the Korea Contents Association
• /
• v.21 no.9
• /
• pp.1-11
• /
• 2021

The domestic content market has grown continuously. Furthermore, content consumption has rapidly increased in the COVID-19 era. For these reasons, it is necessary to investigate consumer behavior related to content business. This study focuses on content names as a key factor that induces consumers' interest in the content. In particular, this research examines if the conceptual fluency of the content name affects consumers' liking for the content. In addition, it explores the moderating effect of style of information processing (verbalizer vs. visualizer). The results of an experiment shows that the conceptual fluency on the content name is positively influential for liking content. Also, there was a significant interaction effect between verbalizers and conceptual fluency on content name. This study has important findings in terms of content marketing strategies. Above all, it has strong points because this research examines the style of information processing as an important consumer characteristic variable.

• Korean journal of communication and information
• /
• v.47
• /
• pp.96-119
• /
• 2009

Although there ate many studies on cross-cultural comparison of advertising appeals, very little is known about how receivers from different cultures process visual images in global advertising. The purpose of this study is to examine how cultural differences between East Asians and Westerners influence the cognitive process of visual images from standardized global advertising by employing the Nisbett's framework of holistic/analytic thought. Nisbett contends that East Asian tend to attend to the context and the relations between objects and contexts as holistic thinkers while Americans tend to see the worlds analytically. The results of a experimental study conducted using 80 subjects from Korea and the United States suggest that Korean participants are more likely to mention relatively peripheral, nonsalient, or background information than are American participants. Thus, this study support the Nisbett's notion that East Asians are more sensitive to contextual information than are Westerners and challenge the belief that standardized visual images are part of a "universal language".