• Title/Summary/Keyword: 전달불균형 검정법

Search Result 2, Processing Time 0.014 seconds

Transmission and Disequilibrium Tests Based on Sibship Data (형제 및 자매의 유전자형 자료에 기초한 전달불균형 검정법에 관한 연구)

  • Kim, Jin-Heum;Jang, Yang-Soo
    • The Korean Journal of Applied Statistics
    • /
    • v.21 no.1
    • /
    • pp.81-94
    • /
    • 2008
  • Family-based tests such as the transmission and disequilibrium tests(TDT) have proved to be powerful tools in the search for disease genes. Unlike case-control studies, the tests are not affected by population admixture, which can lead to spurious association of multiple highly linked makers with disease-susceptible genes. Those tests have largely required knowledge of parental marker genotypes. However, parental data are often not available for late-onset diseases. In this article we propose sib-TDTs that overcome this problem by use of marker data from unaffected sib(s) instead of parents. To do this end, we fist defined a Mantel-Haenszel-type statistic for each haplotype and then proposed two tests based on this statistic. Simulation studies suggest that the proposed tests are robust to population admixture and are monotone increasing as a relative risk increases irrespective of mode of inheritance. We also illustrated the proposed tests with data adopted from Yonsei Cardiovascular Genome Center.

Comparison of the Family Based Association Test and Sib Transmission Disequilibrium Test for Dichotomous Trait (이산형 형질에 대한 가족자료 연관성 검정법 FBAT와 형제 전달 불균형 연관성 검정법 S-TDT의 비교)

  • Kim, Han-Sang;Oh, Young-Sin;Song, Hae-Hiang
    • The Korean Journal of Applied Statistics
    • /
    • v.23 no.6
    • /
    • pp.1103-1113
    • /
    • 2010
  • An extensively used approach for family based association test(FBAT) is compared with the sib transmission/disequilibrium test(S-TDT), and in particular the adjusted S-TDT, in which the covariance among related siblings is taken into consideration, can provide a more sensitive test statistic for association. A simulation study comparing the three test statistics demonstrates that the type I error rates of all three tests are larger than the prespecified significance level and the power of the FBAT is lower than those of the other two tests. More detailed studies are required in order to assess the influence of the assumed conditions in FBAT on the efficiency of the test.