• The Journal of the Korea Contents Association
• /
• v.15 no.10
• /
• pp.354-361
• /
• 2015

The purpose of this study is to investigate validation of the Recovery Assessment Scale(RAS) for Korean Version using Rasch analysis. This study included 60 patients who had chronic schizophrenia and were aged 18 or older. The data were analysed using a Rasch analysis to investigate whether the persons and items fit, the distribution of item difficulty and the appropriateness of the rating scale. 1 out of 60 subjects were found to not fit. 3 out of 24 items were also found to be misfit. The misfitted items was 'I believe that I can meet my current personal goals','Even when I don't care about myself, other people do. ','Coping with my mental illness is no longer the main focus of my life.'. Of the appropriate items, the most difficult was 'I can handle what happens in my life' and the easiest was 'Something good will eventually happen'. The RAS rating scale was shown to be appropriate for patients who had chronic schizophrenia. The item separation reliability was .70, and the person separation reliability was .94. Further studies are needed to investigate validity and criterion cut-off score for many patients with chronic mental illess.

• The Journal of the Korea Contents Association
• /
• v.14 no.3
• /
• pp.269-276
• /
• 2014

The purpose of this study is to investigate validation of the School Function Assessment(SFA) for Korean Version using Rasch analysis. The subjects were recruited 98 students with disabilities in Seoul, Kyoung-Ki, Chung-cheung. The data were analysed using Rasch analysis to investigate unidimensionality and rating scale model. The 4 items out of SFA Part II were found to be misfts. The 18 items out of physical tasks, the 14 items out of cognitive/behavioral tasks in Part III were found to be misfit. All rating scale in SFA was appropriate. Further studies are needed to investigate validity and criterion cut-off score for many students with disabilities.

• Korean Journal of Social Welfare
• /
• v.59 no.4
• /
• pp.273-296
• /
• 2007

In this Study, to reconstruct the disability identity scale(Lee and Shin, 2006)), Rasch rating scale model was applied to the four sub-dimensions of the Disability Identity Scale in a sample of spinal cord injuries(N=397). The Disability Identity Scale was verified by explorative factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis. However, factor analytic procedures can't evaluate item-fit indices, item difficulty, and appropriate scale category. A number of limitations posed by confirmatory factor analytic procedures can be averted with the use of Rasch rating scale model which is in the item response theory(IRT). So in this study, Rasch model was applied to the Disability Identity Scale. Results revealed that (A) 20 items were selected from Rasch model, (B) the difficulty level of the Disability Identity Scale was the average level, (C) 4-point rating scale was appropriate for the Disability Identity Scale. Finally, we could suggest that the sub-dimensions concepts of the disability identity became clearer and items were to the good fitting.

• Proceedings of the Korea Water Resources Association Conference
• /
• 2023.05a
• /
• pp.328-328
• /
• 2023

표준강수지수(Standardized Precipitation Index, SPI)는 강수량 변동의 정도를 표준화하여 나타낸 지수로, 가뭄 평가에 적용되고 있다. 일반적으로 SPI를 산정할 때는 월 단위의 시간 척도를 적용하며, 장기간의 가뭄에 대해 평가한다. 그러나 시간 척도가 길어질수록 가뭄 발생 후 가뭄을 감지하는 데 걸리는 시간이 더 길어지기 때문에 대처가 더욱 어려워진다. 또한, 기후변화로 인해 가뭄 빈도가 증가하고, 그 정도가 더욱 심화되면서 일 단위의 적용이 필요해지고 있다. 본 연구는 한반도 남부지역을 대상으로 일 단위의 SPI 적용을 위한 최소 시간 척도를 조사하였다. 대상 지역을 강원권, 수도권, 부울경, 대경권, 호남권, 충청권의 총 6개 지역으로 분리하여, 각 지역별, 계절별 최소 시간 척도를 조사하였다. SPI 산정을 위해 후보 분포형으로 Gumbel, Gamma, GEV, Loglogistic, Lognormal, Weibull을 적용하였으며, 시간 척도는 5일부터 365일까지 총 10개로 설정하였다. 본 연구에선 크게 적합도 검정과 정규성 검정으로 진행하였다. 적합도 검정에서는 Chi-square test를 적용하였으며, 이때 일 단위의 짧은 시간 척도를 적용할 경우 누가 강수 시계열의 값이 0으로, 0값이 시계열에 포함되면 SPI의 정확도가 떨어지는 문제가 발생하는데, 이를 보완하기 위해 누가 강수 시계열의 0값을 고려하였다. 마지막으로 각 후보 분포형을 적용하여 산정된 SPI가 표준정규분포에 합당한지를 검증하기 위해 Anderson-Darling test를 수행하였다. 결과적으로 대부분의 지역에서는 봄과 여름의 경우 최소 15일 정도의 시간 척도까지는 적용할 수 있을 것으로 판단되며, 겨울의 경우는 최소 30일 정도의 시간 척도를 적용해야 함을 확인하였다. 지역별로 차이가 크진 않지만, 이러한 연구 결과를 참고하여 각 지역별로 더 나은 가뭄 대책을 마련할 수 있을 것으로 기대된다.

• Korean Security Journal
• /
• no.31
• /
• pp.25-45
• /
• 2012

Based on the results of preceding researches that the uncertainty perceived by the private security guards about their roles exerts direct effects on the business performance of the security industry, it needs to preferentially examine the degree of authority that the private security guards have. The suitability of the psychological empowerment criteria for measuring this for private security guards, however, has not yet been established up to the present, so it can be said that the validity of the information has not yet been established. Accordingly, as the psychological empowerment criteria of private security guards, this research examined the suitability of items, reliability of items, the level of difficulty of items, and the item goodness of fit from the viewpoint of the appropriateness of category of responses, and it is summarized as follows. First, in the self-determinism factor of the psychological empowerment criteria, Item 11 was found to be an unsuitable item, so it is proper that Item 11 should be deleted when examining the psychological empowerment of private security guards from now on. Second, the item reliability of the psychological empowerment criteria was high, so the consistency of the results is shown even if the data are collected from the other private security guards. Third, they feel that it is hard to respond to Item 12 while they perceive that Item 1 is the easiest, and the level of items of the psychological empowerment criteria is evenly distributed. Fourth, it was established that the 5-point categories of the psychological empowerment criteria were suitable to the private security guards.

• Journal of Gifted/Talented Education
• /
• v.21 no.2
• /
• pp.449-463
• /
• 2011

The purpose of this study was to examine the validity of Multiple Intelligence Scales for Young Korean Children (MIS-YKC). Participants of this study were 357 children's parents and teachers from Seoul, Gyeongdo, Jeonlado & Choongchungdo. Data were analyzed by confirmatory factor analysis, Pearson's r and Cronbach's ${\alpha}$. Results are as follows. (1) Confirmatory factor analysis of MIS-YKC for parents MIS-YKC revealed that fit indices such as $X^2$=365.712 (df=168, p=.000), RMSEA=.057, SRMR=.047, NNFI=.935, CFI=.948. and MIS-KYC by teacher's evaluation $X^2$=436.765 (df=168, p=.000), RMSEA=.066, SRMR=.051, NNFI=.917, CFI=.934. (2) Correlations between multiple intelligence scales and IQ were significant. (3) Cronbach's ${\alpha}$ ranged from .80 and .86 for seven intelligence scales and .95 for the total scale by parents' evaluation. Cronbach's ${\alpha}$ is ranged from .76 and .91 for seven intelligence scales and .95 for the total scale by teacher's evaluation. All these results show that the multiple intelligence scales for young Korean children parents and teachers are quite reliable and valid.

• Journal of Families and Better Life
• /
• v.13 no.1
• /
• pp.145-156
• /
• 1995

본 연구의 목적은 우리나라 가족 연구와 가족생활교육 및 가족상담 장면에서 활용될 수 있는 가족의 건강도 척도를 개발하는 것이다. 선행연구 및 관련 척도 고찰을 통하여 하위 요인 및 문항을 구성하였고, 문항의 적합도와 안면 타당도 검증 과정을 거쳐 예비조사 도구 100문항이 구성되었다. 가족생활주기별로 344명의 어머니를 대상으로 하였으며, 문항양호도를 파악하기 위하여 X^2$ 값과 Cramer의 V계수를 산출하였고, 척도의 구인타당도를 검증하기 위하여 요인분석을 실시한 결과, 4개 요인(가족간의 의사소통, 가족간의 몰입, 가족원의 적응력, 가족 가치관)이 추출되었으며, 이들은 전체적으로 57%의 설명력을 갖는다. 또한 회귀분석을 실시하여 각 요인별 문항을 선정함으로서 최종적으로 34문항이 구성되었다. '가족 건강도' 척도 및 그 하위 요인과 ${\ulcorner}Family\;Adaptability\;and\;Cohesion\;Evaluation\;Scale{\lrcorner}$, ${\ulcorner}Family\;Stengths\;Scale{\lrcorner}$과의 상관계수는 .25에서 .56사이로 나타나 본 척도의 공인타당도가 입증되었다. 척도의 신뢰도는 Cronbach의 a계수 .94로 나타났으며, 하위요인별로는 .80에서 .91로 만족스럽게 나타났다.

• Journal of the Korean Data and Information Science Society
• /
• v.24 no.6
• /
• pp.1319-1329
• /
• 2013

The purpose of this research was to develop and validate the coach-athlete relationship scale suitable to amateur golf players by applying the Rasch rating scale model. As the coach-athlete relationship scale, the Korean form of scale developed by Kim and Park (2008), which was revised based on the evidence on the basis of inspection contents, was used to conduct a survey on 217 amateur golf athletes. And the unidimensionality, which is the basic assumption of the Rasch model, was verified using the WINSTEPS program, and the appropriateness of the item category was established through the step calibration. The goodness of fit of each question was tested through the goodness-of-fit index and the differential item functioning (DIF) was estimated according to the golf career. When the goodness-of-fit index estimated for each question was 1.30 or more it was judged unfit and the significance level in the analysis was all set as.05. The results of the analysis showed that the measures variance explained by the Rasch measurement model was more (33.7%) than 20%, so the unidimensionality assumptions of the 11 questions (..hospitable posture when my coach is teaching) were satisfied. The result of analyzing the item category (7 scale) with step calibration was found to be unfit, but in the result of reanalyzing by rescoring into a 5-point scale, it was found to be fit. Particularly, in the result of estimating the goodness-of-fit using the systematized item category (5 scale), Question 10 (...my best when my coach is teaching) and Question 11 were found to be unfit, and as a result of estimating the differential functioning item according to golf career, Question 11 was found to be unevenly differentiated according to golf career. So the 5-point scale of Question 9 after eliminating the two questions which were unfit and differentiated was validated to be the coach-athlete relationship scale suitable to amateur golf athletes.

• Journal of the Korean Data and Information Science Society
• /
• v.22 no.3
• /
• pp.487-494
• /
• 2011

The purpose of this study was to investigate self-esteem item goodness-of-fit in sports talented children with socio-psychological aspect, which may be a basis of developing global sports leaders. Fifty children who were selected by 2010 sports talent identification program at Korea National Sport University participated in this study. All participants were asked to answer the questionnaire using Rogenberg (1965) self-esteem scale. Total 8 questions were used with 4 point Likert scale and high point stands for higher self-esteem status. Reliability of Cronbach's ${\alpha}$ was.785 in this study. Frequency analysis, descriptive statistics, and reliability analysis were conducted with SPSS 18.0. WINSTEPS 3.70 (Linacre, 2010) was used for calculating item goodness-of-fit and subject reliability, scale propriety, item goodness-of-fit and item level of difficulty, and level of difficulty were calculated. Statistical analysis showed results as follows. First, it was reported to be suitable for subject reliability in self-esteem as 1.01~1.03 and item reliability as 1.01~1.01. Second, 4 scale was suitable for scale propriety resulting from stage index judgment. Third, 2,7,8 and 3 question showed problems in item goodness-of-fit and item level of difficulty. Finally, scale propriety was reported to be inappropriate for considering sports talented children's ability distribution and scale level of difficulty.

• Korean Journal of Child Education & Care
• /
• v.19 no.1
• /
• pp.117-127
• /
• 2019

Objective: The purpose of this study was a teacher efficacy scale for pre-service teacher and to examine the reliability and validity of the scale. Methods: Participants for this study were 428 pre-service teachers from G region. the data were analyzed using correlation, Cronbach's ${\alpha}$, Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA). Results: The pre-service teacher efficacy scale was consisted of 3 factors, 'efficacy for instructional strategies', 'efficacy for student engagement' and 'efficacy for classroom management' with 12 items. Cronbach's ${\alpha}$ was ranged from .72 to .82. The confirmatory factor analysis revealed that CMIN/DF = 1.59, RMSEA = .05, SRMR = .05, TLI = .96, CFI = .97. Conclusion/Implications: In conclusion, all these results show that the pre-service teacher efficacy scale is quite a reliability and validity.