• Title/Summary/Keyword: 저자역할

Search Result 379, Processing Time 0.028 seconds

Generation of Collaboration Network and Analysis of Researcher's Role in National Cancer Center (협업네트워크 구축과 연구자 역할 분석 -국립암센터 사례 중심으로-)

  • Jang, Hae-Lan
    • The Journal of the Korea Contents Association
    • /
    • v.15 no.10
    • /
    • pp.387-399
    • /
    • 2015
  • Recently collaboration network is generated to find out experts in their field as potential collaborators in health care sector. In this paper, the co-author network of a National Cancer Center researcher was generated for identifying each researcher's role and collaborative research pattern. The co-author network of 2,437 authors was extracted from 1,194 SCI(E) publications from 2000 to 2010 and author's role was analyzed by author's centrality value. Centrality reflecting only the number of papers and centrality weighted by the paper number, impact factor, and authorship contribution was evaluated. On the comparison with simple degree centrality value and the weighted degree centrality, difference of value was statistically significant(t=11.66, p=0.00). Co-author network considering various variables of the paper provides more objective figure of researcher's role. This suggests that co-author network could be more effective in identifying potential collaborators.

Designing a FRBR Work Grouping Algorithm of Bibliographic Records using a Role Term Dictionary of Authors (저자역할용어사전 구축 및 저작군집화에 관한 연구)

  • Yun, Jaehyuk;Do, Seulki;Oh, Sam G.
    • Journal of the Korean Society for information Management
    • /
    • v.37 no.2
    • /
    • pp.197-223
    • /
    • 2020
  • The purpose of this study is to analyze the issues resulted from the process of grouping KORMARC records using FRBR WORK concept and to suggest a new method. The previous studies did not sufficiently address the criteria or processes for identifying representative authors of records and their derivatives. Therefore, our study focused on devising a method of identifying the representative author when there are multiple contributors in a work. The study developed a method of identifying representative authors using an author role dictionary constructed by extracting role-terms from the statement of responsibility field (245). We also designed another way to group records as a work by calculating similarity measures of authors and titles. The accuracy rate of WORK grouping was the highest when blank spaces, parentheses, and controling processes were removed from titles and the measured similarity rates of authors and titles were higher than 80 percent. This was an experiment study where we developed an author-role dictionary that can be utilized in selecting a representative author and measured the similarity rate of authors and titles in order to achieve effective WORK grouping of KORMARC records. The future study will attempt to devise a way to improve the similarity measure of titles, incorporate FRBR Group 1 entities such as expression, manifestation and item data into the algorithm, and a method of improving the algorithm by utilizing other forms of MARC data that are widely used in Korea.

Authorship and Inappropriate Authorship from an Ethical Publication Perspective (출판 윤리적 관점에서의 저자됨과 부적절한 저자됨)

  • Sung Hun Kim;Jung Im Jung
    • Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology
    • /
    • v.83 no.4
    • /
    • pp.752-758
    • /
    • 2022
  • Authorship is important for research integrity and publication ethics, acting as the basis for credit and academic achievement. Moreover, publication achievements have a significant impact on research grants and academic careers. Inappropriate authorship has been reported for several reasons, including complex interests and competitive environments. One form of this is representative authorship misuse, which includes honorary and ghost authorships. Kin co-authorship, such as parent-children authorship, is another form of inappropriate authorship that has recently emerged as a social problem in Korea. To address these issues, the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) has established criteria for authorship. Similarly, many journals use the Contributor Roles Taxonomy (CRediT) and Open Researcher and Contributor ID (ORCID) systems to prevent authorship misuse and systematically evaluate author credit and responsibility. Herein, this article reviews authorship and inappropriate authorship, as well as introduces methods to avoid authorship misuse.

공공도서관 비판론의 비판적 검토(2)

  • Nam, Yeong-Jun;Sin, Hye-Won
    • KLA journal
    • /
    • v.35 no.5 s.288
    • /
    • pp.34-69
    • /
    • 1994
  • 본고는 도서관정보대학의 약대 수수교수가 [현대의도서관] 30권 1호(1992)에 발표한 논문을 저자의 승인을 받아 (1994.1.23) 번역한 것으로, 원문제목은「공공도서관비판론의비판적검토」이다. 본고는 일본 내에서 제기되는 공공도서관에 대한 부정적 시각을 저자가 이론적 접근 방법으로 반박한 글이다. 이는 국내 공공도서관의 역할 공유 론에 대한 문제점을 이해하는데 좋은 자료가 될 수 있을 것으로 기대된다. <역자 주>

  • PDF

인터뷰 - '기억투쟁과 문화운동의 전개' 저자 정근식을 만나다

  • Jeong, Geun-Sik
    • KLA journal
    • /
    • v.45 no.6 s.349
    • /
    • pp.42-44
    • /
    • 2004
  • 이번 도서관문화 6월호에서는 최근 ‘기억투쟁과 문화운동의 전개’라는 책을 공동 집필하여 주목받았던 서울대학교 사회학과 정근식 교수를 만나, 사회적 기억의 중요성과 기억 보존을 위한 투쟁과정에서 전개되는 문화운동과 관련한 도서관의 역할 등을 내용으로 대화를 나누었다.

  • PDF

지역병원의 기술수준(V)

  • Sin, Yeong-Su;Kim, Yong-Ik;Gwon, Yeong-Dae;Seo, Jeong-Suk
    • Journal of the Korean hospital association
    • /
    • v.18 no.5 s.164
    • /
    • pp.54-61
    • /
    • 1989
  • 이 글은 최근 일차보건의료에 있어 새로운 접근방법으로 제시되고 있는 "지역의료체계"내에서, 병원이 어떠한 역할을 담당하여야 하며, 그러한 역할을 담당하기 위해서는 어떠한 변화가 필요한지를 제시하고 있다. 그러나 저자가 지적하고 있는 바와 같이 꼭 지역의료체계 개념이 아니더라도 지역사회내에서 주민의 건장증진에 기여하고자 할 때 병원이 어떠한 방향을 취하여야 할 것인가에 대해서 일반론적으로도 많은 시사를 던져주고 있다.지역의료체계에 대한 최근의 문헌들 중에서 병원에 대해 가장 상세하고 종합적 논의를 전개하고 있어, 벌리 소개하고자 한다.

  • PDF

자서전 "빈 들에서" 전3권 펴낸 강원룡목사

  • Kim, Jung-Sik
    • The Korean Publising Journal, Monthly
    • /
    • s.140
    • /
    • pp.4-5
    • /
    • 1993
  • 교회와 사회의 '인간화'를 위해 한국현대사와 희로애락을 함께 했던 이 시대의 원로 강원용목사의 자서전이 전3권으로 출간됐다. 이 책은 굴곡의 우리현대사의 이면과 비화를 증언할뿐만 아니라 저자 자신의 참회와 반성까지를 그 내용으로 하고 있어 주목된다. 정.교의 보혁갈등 속에서 '대화'를 화두삼은 가교역할의 인생이었다.

  • PDF

출판저널 창간5주년 기념세미나 제2주제 발표 및 토론-포스트모던문화의 글쓰기와 저자

  • Bok, Geo-Il
    • The Korean Publising Journal, Monthly
    • /
    • s.110
    • /
    • pp.14-17
    • /
    • 1992
  • 소설가는 지금 영화나 방속극에서 대본작가가 맡은 것과 비슷한 역할을 맡을 것이다. 이미 우리사회에서 가장 큰 영향력을 지닌 작가들은 텔레비전 연속극 작가들이라는 주장을 펼 수도 있는 상황이 되었다. 시인은 노래의 가사를 만드는 일에 힘을 쏟게 될 것이고, 평론가는 그런 예술작품들의 비평자라기보다는 소개자가 될 것이다.

  • PDF

Analysis of Co-authorship Network in the Lifelong Vocational Education and Training: An Analysis of Papers Published from 2000 to 2015 in Korea (평생 직업교육훈련 분야의 공저자 네트워크 분석: 2000년~2015년 국내 학술논문을 중심으로)

  • Park, Ji-Young;Lee, Hee-Su
    • Journal of vocational education research
    • /
    • v.35 no.6
    • /
    • pp.85-112
    • /
    • 2016
  • This study aims to identify the cooperative relations among researchers and their network structures based on the academic papers published in the field of lifelong vocational education and training from 2000 to 2015. Authors in three representative journals, 'Journal of Lifelong Education', 'Journal of Vocational Education Research', and 'Korea Research Institute for Vocational Education & Training,' during the periods, were selected and co-authorship network analysis was applied using NetMiner 4.0 in order to find the social relation among researchers and their academic influences. The results showed that the research productivity in the field of lifelong vocational education and training forms a shape of the power function where there exist components called, 'detailed research groups.' This network structure represents characteristics of a small world. In addition, the centrality analysis suggest authors with high centrality serve as co-authors who play as a central role on the network and exchange information with other researchers, while those with high betweenness centrality serve as a channel where they transfer knowledge and information among research groups. Increasing member of co-authorship has positively contributed to the opportunity and development of cooperative research among researchers in the field of lifelong vocational education and training. However it is recommended co-authorship be formed more heterogeneously instead of a few researches centrally dominate co-authorship. Various researchers should continually conduct research for good research performances.