• Annual Conference on Human and Language Technology
• /
• 2006.10e
• /
• pp.189-196
• /
• 2006

본 논문은 시맨틱 웹 응용 서비스를 구현함에 있어 필수적으로 요구되는 온톨로지 인스턴스 구축을 효율적으로 처리하는 데 있어 텍스트 처리 기술이 어떤 역할을 수행할 수 있는 가를 $OntoFrame-K^{(R)}$라는 시맨틱 웹 기반 정보 유통 체계에의 적용 사례를 통해 살펴본다. 본 논문에서 소개하는 텍스트 처리 기술은 개체 확인물 통한 개념 사례화, 주제 분야 할당을 통한 메타데이터 확장에, 그리고 인용 정보 추출 및 인용 관계 구축을 통한 객체 관계속성 구축에 적용된다. 개체 확인에서는 메타데이터 비교 잊 병합을 사용하였으며 이를 기반으로 한 수작업 구축을 통해 8,543명의 인력 URI를 확보하였다. 주제 및 분야 할당에서는 색인어와 분야분류명이 매핑된 시소러스 개념어의 매칭을 통해 색인어 별 TF (Term Frequency), 색인어와 매칭된 개념어 별 TF, 색인어와 매칭된 개념어 별 시소러스에서의 깊이, 색인어와 매칭된 개념어 별 개념 패싯, 색인어와 매칭된 각 개념어에 부착된 분야분류명 목록 등 할당을 위한 다양한 자질을 확보 적용하였다. 인용 정보 추출과 인용 관계 구축에서는 객체 URI와 인력 URI를 기반으로 하여 자동 추출된 인용 정보를 반영하는 방식으로 7,237개 문헌으로부터 총 135개의 인용 네트워크 그룹을 자동으로 확보하였다. 본 연구를 통해 제시된 텍스트 처리 기술의 활용 방안이 향후 시맨틱 웹 응용 서비스 및 인프라 구현에서 다각적으로 활용될 수 있기를 기대한다.

• The Korean Society of Law and Medicine
• /
• v.20 no.3
• /
• pp.143-174
• /
• 2019

Our Constitution obliges the state to protect the health of the people, and the Medical Law, which embodied Constitution, sets out in detail the matters related to open the medical institution, and one of them is to prohibit the operation of multiple medical institutions. By the way, virtually multiple medical institutions could be opened and operated because the Supreme Court had interpreted that several medical institutions could be opened if medical activities were not performed directly at the additional medical institution which was opened under the another doctor's license. However, some health care providers opened the several medical institutions with another doctor's license for the purpose of the maximization of profit, and did illegal medical cares like the unfair luring of patients, over-treatment, and commission treatment. Also, realistic problems such as the infringed health rights have arisen. Accordingly, lawmakers had come to amend the Medical Law to readjust the system of opening for medical institution so that medical personnel could not open or operate more than one medical institution for any reason. For this reason, the Constitutional Court recently declared a constitutional decision through a long period of in-depth deliberation because the constitutional petition and the adjudication on the constitutionality of statutes had been filed on whether Article 33 paragraph 8 of the revised medical law is unconstitutional. The Constitutional Court acknowledged the "justice of purpose" in view of the importance of public medical institutions, of the prevention from seduction of for-profit patients and from over-treatment, and of the fact that health care should not be the object of commercial transactions. Given the risk that medical personnel might be subject to outside capital, the concern that the holder of the medical institution's opening certificate and the actual operator may be separated, the principle that the human body and life should not be just a means, and the current system's inability to identify over-treatment, it also acknowledged the 'minimum infringement'. Furthermore, The Constitutional Court judged it is constitutional in compliance with the principle of restricting fundamental rights, such as 'balance of legal interests'. In this regard, legislative complements are needed in order to effectively prevent the for-profit management and the over-treatment the Constitutional Court is concerned about. In this regard, consumer groups actively support the need for legislation, and health care providers groups also agree on the need for legislation. Therefore, the legislators should respect the recent Constitutional Court's decision and in the near future complete the complementary legislation to reflect the people's interests.