• 무역상무연구
• /
• 제54권
• /
• pp.99-122
• /
• 2012

According to the United Nations Convention on the International Sale of Goods, the Seller must deliver the goods, hand over any documents relating to the them and transfer the property the to the goods as required by the contract, and buyer must pay the price for the goods and take delivery of them as required by the contract. In particular, the seller provides the documents is important. If the documents are discrepancies in credit, the beneficiary may not receive the payment. So It is important to study on conditions of documents in international trade. Documents provided by the seller shall be determined by express terms. If there is no agreement on the express terms, it shall be determined by the implied terms or governing law terms. In practice Seller shall provide the documents are as follows, For example, transport documents, commercial invoice, certificate of origin, insurance policy, packing list, inspection certificate etc. As stated above if it can not be determined by express terms, it is determined by the implied terms. In international trade, leading to the implied terms is incoterms(R) 2010 and UCP 600. Incoterms(R) 2010 define the seller must provide the goods and the commercial in conformity with the sales contract and any other evidence of conformity that may be required by the contract and UCP 600 are rules that apply to documentary credit. This paper, the practical utility between Incoterms(R) 2010 and UCP 600 is studied.

• 통상정보연구
• /
• 제14권3호
• /
• pp.481-511
• /
• 2012

국제상업회의소에 의하여 2010년에 개정되어 2011년 1월 1일부터 시행된 Incoterms 2010의 모든 규칙의 A6조와 B6조에 각각 규정되어 있는 매도인과 매수인 간의 비용의 분배를 다루고 있는 비용분배조항이 종전의 Incoterms 2000의 비용분배조항과 비교하여 볼 때 어떻게 개정되었으며, 개정된 Incoterms 2010의 비용분배조항의 내용을 구체적으로 살펴보고 비용분배조항에서 해석상의 문제점에 대한 유의사항을 살펴보았다. 즉, Incoterms 2010의 모든 규칙의 비용분배조항의 해석에 따른 문제점으로서, 통상적인 운송계약의 조건에 따른 비용분배의 문제점, 적재비용과 양륙비용지급의 문제점, 매수인의 의무불이행에 따른 추가비용지급의 문제점 및 이에 대한 실무적용상의 유의점을 제시하였다.

• 한국중재학회지:중재연구
• /
• 제21권3호
• /
• pp.189-211
• /
• 2011

This article aims at analysing the practical problems of FOB and CIF terms relating to Incoterms$^{(R)}$2010 in case of L/C transactions and presenting the defending measures against them. According to Incoterms$^{(R)}$2010, FOB and CIF terms are to be used only for sea or inland waterway transport and require the seller deliver the goods on board the vessel nominated by the buyer at named port of shipment. So if FOB and CIF terms will be used in sea transport under L/C transaction, the seller should ship the goods on the nominated vessel and present the shipping document indicating "on board vessel" to the issuing bank but the parties agree to present the received bill of lading according to special condition on L/C which is" received bill of lading are acceptable". In practical transaction, FOB and CIF terms are usually used in aircraft cargo, container cargo or multimodal transport. these facts are a violation of Incoterms. Incoterms$^{(R)}$2010 which regulated that FOB and CIF terms may not be appropriate where goods are handed over the carrier before they are on board the vessel for example goods in container. These transactions are a temporary expedient and breach of Incoterms in the international trade which must be corrected as soon as possible.