• 지역과문화
• /
• v.8 no.1
• /
• pp.25-53
• /
• 2021

Based on the assumption that understandings and practices have been shifted in accordance with the historical context, this study aims to propose future policies to localize cultural diversity. First, in this study, it is necessary for the concept of cultural diversity, which came from political struggles, to understand and practice cultural diversity in the historical context by analyzing the multilayer aspects of policy practices. Second, through the case study of Jeonlabuk-do, by reviewing the discrimination experienced by social minorities and the perception of professionals related to culture policies in the region, this study represents to understand and practice of cultural diversity in the multi-layed way, even in the local. Lastly, it suggests some specific future policies to be considered when implicating the policies of culture diversity in respond to the limits of current government policies, including: decentralization of policies, enhancing local policies, transition from 'politics of distribution' to 'politics of recognition', an interculturalist approach that promotes contact rather than separation

• Journal of Korean Philosophical Society
• /
• v.139
• /
• pp.23-45
• /
• 2016

This paper analyzes Paul Ricoeur's theory of mutual recognition with the concern for the establishment of a desirable relationship between cultures. Ricoeur tries to construct his own theory via Hegel and Honneth. He thinks, according to their theory, the state of being recognized could not arrive eternally. This means that the struggle for recognition could continue permanently. To put an end to the struggle for recognition, Ricoeur introduces the state of peace made possible by the exchange of ceremonial gifts. In other words, the struggle could be eliminated symbolically thorough the exchange of gifts. The mutuality established by this process however, can not accomplish its meaning without overcoming the original dissymmetry between one and the other in which phenomenology has a keen interest. To integrate the dissymmetry into mutuality, Ricoeur gives attention to 'between' the giver and the receiver in the system of gift exchange. He carries out this task by securing a just distance, or a distance in proximity.

• 한국만화애니메이션학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 2011.05a
• /
• pp.66-77
• /
• 2011

1895년 영화가 탄생하면서부터 영화가 예술로서 인정받기까지 오랜 시간이 걸렸듯이 영화가 그 교육적 가치를 인정받기까지도 상당히 오랜 시간이 걸렸다. 즉, 영화가 소비 지향적이라는 비판에서부터 영화는 집에서만 봐도 충분하다는 식의 편견까지 이러한 오해를 불식시키기까지 짧지 않은 시간이 흘렀다. 영화 자체가 교육적 대상으로 인정받기 시작한 것은 1964년 영국영화연구소에서 나온 "영화교육(Film Teaching)"에서 영화교육의 필요성이 논의된 이후에 자연스럽게 그 가치를 인정받기 시작했다. 한편 2004년부터 예술강사 지원사업에 의해 영화교육의 대중화가 본격적으로 이루어졌고, 한 해 뒤인 2005년 만화애니메이션교육이 대중화시대를 열었다. 이렇듯 만화애니메이션교육과 영화교육은 그 교육적 접근은 오래되지 않았지만, 교육과 관련해서 전문적인 동시에 대중적인 측면도 함께 지니고 있다. 다시 말해서, 대학교육에서 이론적이고 실제적인 교육이 이루어지고 있지만, 대중적인 영향력을 통해서 초 중등학교에서 많은 관심을 가지고 있는 교육영역이다. 이렇게 다양한 층위에서 진행되고 있는 만화애니메이션교육과 영화교육을 문화예술교육이라는 범주에서 살펴볼 것이다. 이는 전문예술인 양성을 위한 전문교육인 아닌 초 중등학교에서 이루어지고 있는 문화예술교육이라는 관점에서 바라볼 것이다. 특히 한국문화예술진흥원의 예술강사 지원사업을 중심으로 현재 진행되고 있는 만화애니메이션교육과 영화교육을 점검할 것이다. 그리고 영화교육에서 진행되고 있는 교직과정을 살펴봄으로써 만화애니메이션교육도 이러한 제도적 뒷받침의 필요성을 밝힐 것이다.

• Korean Journal of Heritage: History & Science
• /
• v.44 no.4
• /
• pp.18-41
• /
• 2011

The Safeguarding of Intangible Cultural Heritage in Korea has begun since1962 when the Cultural Properties Protection Act was established. Korean ICH Safeguarding system is initially derived from Cultural Properties Protection Act in Japan. Japan has started Important ICH Designation System in 1954 to concede the skills and artistic talents holders, thus it could implement the multilateral system management for adopting different ICH protection systems such as Important Intangible Folklore Properties, Selection and Preservation Techniques, and Documenting Records. However, Korea has solely adopted Important ICH Designation System since Cultural Properties Protection Act was introduced. Korean ICH Safeguarding System represented by the Certification System of ICH Skill Holders is to ensure skills and artistic holders who perform the elements of Intangible Cultural Heritage, and manage the safeguarding of intangible cultural heritage in order to let the skills and artistic holders instruct inheritors. As a result, it could build up the internal foundation for the diffusion of inheritors and established the related organizations. However, the inheritor-centered protection system has caused many problems as it is being lasted for more than fifty years. Fragmented designation measures, the cultural power of skill holders, and the research and evaluation methods have pointed out the difficulties of safeguarding and preservation measures of ICH. Moreover,the legitimacy of safeguarding system related in the authenticity of transmission in ICH has emerged to review the safeguarding system of ICH with diverse viewpoints. Therefore, this paper will review the implementation process and achievement of ICH safeguarding system to examine the problem and causes of the safeguarding system. The conference records of Cultural Property Association and articles of cultural properties policies directors, Cultural Property Association members, and professional experts are being used for the initial materials of this paper, and it is examined for the contents of designation system of Important Cultural Heritage, rather than overall cases. Thus such problems the limitation of expansion in ICH lists as inheritor-centered designation system, hierarchical and exclusive transmission system, inappropriate concept of archetype as the principle of ICH transmission are derived from the root of Important ICH designation system. Thus this paper demonstrates that this system must be revised for the expansion of ICH safeguarding system in Korea and points out multilateral protection system should be established as well as Certification System of Important ICH skill holders.

• Journal of the Korean association of regional geographers
• /
• v.15 no.5
• /
• pp.635-654
• /
• 2009

Recently, concepts of multicultural society and/or multiculturalism have been not only widely discussed across several disciplines, but also actively promoted in government's policy, as the in-flow of foreign immigrants has increased rapidly. This paper suggests the term 'multicultural space' instead of multicultural society in a sense that both international migration of immigrants and their accommodation to a certain locality presuppose a spatial dimension. This paper also points out that the term multiculturalsim should be used very carefully, because this term includes a normative character implied in a sense of recognition of ethnic and cultural diversity and difference on the one hand, and an ideological one reflected on strategic policies of capital and the state on the other. On the basis of recognition of these problems, this paper tries to reformulate spatially the concept of muticultural society which has been supposed to be constructed due to rapidly increasing foreign immigrants, emphasizing some usefulness of multi-scalar approach. It then analyzes economic and political contexts of transnational migration, providing a criticism of multiculturalism as an ideological logic of capital and the state in transnational captialism. Finally it put a stress upon importance of struggle for spaces of recognition as a new glocal ethics in the age of post-globalization.

• KLA journal
• /
• v.51 no.3
• /
• pp.2-3
• /
• 2010

• The Korean Publising Journal, Monthly
• /
• s.359
• /
• pp.31-33
• /
• 2005

• 프린팅코리아
• /
• s.68
• /
• pp.68-71
• /
• 2008

• The Korean Publising Journal, Monthly
• /
• s.284
• /
• pp.14-15
• /
• 2000

• The Korean Publising Journal, Monthly
• /
• s.148
• /
• pp.14-15
• /
• 1994