• Proceedings of the Korean Society for Information Management Conference
• /
• 2006.08a
• /
• pp.135-142
• /
• 2006

인용을 통한 연구성과 지표인 h-지수는 2005년에 제안된 이후 공식의 간단명료함, 용이한 산출 방법, 지수의 강건성 등이 인정되면서 계량정보학 분야를 비롯한 학술 공동체의 활발한 후속 논의가 이례적으로 신속하게 이어지고 있다. 후속 연구는 주로 h-지수의 타당성 검토, h-지수를 이용한 특정 분야의 개인성과 측정 시도, h-지수의 타 영역에의 응용, h-지수의 보완 등을 주제로 전개되고 있다. 이 연구에서는 우선 h-지수와 이를 보완한 g-지수를 비롯한 변형 지수에 대해서 현재까지 전개되고 있는 논의를 살펴보았다. 그리고 인용빈도가 높지 않은 경우를 고려하여 개선한 지수를 제안하고 실험적인 측정을 시도하였다.

• Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society
• /
• v.51 no.2
• /
• pp.273-294
• /
• 2020

The purpose of this study is to provide an in-depth analysis on the publication patterns of the 1,029 journal articles by the Life Sciences' faculty at the K University, for the years 2004-2017 and to investigate any difference between their publication patterns and the citedness for the years 2004-2018. Among the three funding agency types, the research publications supported by foreign funding received the more citations than publications by other types of funding, and the study also found a statistical difference in the citedness (F = 10.467, p < .000***). In addition, the internationally co-authored publications received more citations than three other types of co-authored publications in terms of the immediacy index per publication and the average citations per publication.

• Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society
• /
• v.19 no.4
• /
• pp.768-798
• /
• 2016

This study started from the awareness of the issue if the citation index newly introduced to evaluate the quality of papers satisfies the proper timing matter, which is a component of performance indicators for the evaluation of government-funded R&D institutes. Accordingly, the study will propose improvement ways to shift the previous evaluation system to quality evaluation for mission-oriented R&D institutes by analysing and using the periodical characteristics such as citation half-life and immediacy index of papers. As a result, it turned out that the speed of academic change is getting faster in proportion to the dependency on the technological development but that the citation speed in the field of public technology is relatively slower and the speed of knowledge transfer in the fields related to industry is faster. In addition, the citation index among the R&D fields showed no differences, and the minimum period for citation index measurement with validity should be over 6 years. The problems of evaluation for mission-oriented R&D institutes were deducted based on the technical and statistical analysis results of the temporal characteristic of citation necessary for quality evaluation of performance among R&D fields. To solve the problems, policy alternatives for object and valid quality evaluation were proposed from the points of evaluation period and evaluation criteria.

• The Journal of the Korea institute of electronic communication sciences
• /
• v.16 no.1
• /
• pp.165-174
• /
• 2021

The purpose of this study is to compare the differences in national R&D research outcomes in science and technology according to gender. For this purpose, the analysis was conducted by mapping WoS SCI(E) papers from 1990to 2018 and NTIS R&D papers from 2007 t0 2016. As a result of examining the differences in research achievements in science and technology according to gender based on three bibliometic indicators - average Times cited, Time-lag, and Impact factor - we found that the overall topography of research achievement was still male-centered, and the differences in the main research area between male and female were also very prominent. On the other hand, in top 10 research areas, it was confirmed that female researchers' outcomes were higher in the number of Times cited and Impact factor.

• Proceedings of the Korean Society for Information Management Conference
• /
• 2005.08a
• /
• pp.357-364
• /
• 2005

저자동시인용 자료에 대한 분석 도구로 삼각매개중심성 (triangle betweenness centrality; TBC) 척도를 비롯하여 네 가지 새로운 척도를 제안하고 정보학 분야의 지적 구조 분석에 적용해보았다. 제안한 척도는 사회네트워크 분석 분야에서 사용되고 있는 여러 중심성 척도를 참고하여 동시인용 데이터에 적합하도륵 고안되었다. 검증을 위해서 이은숙, 정영미(2002)의 연구에서 수집한 1990년부터2000년까지 11년간 Journal of America Society for Information Science에 인용된 주요 저자50명의 동시인용 네트워크를 여러 중심성 척도를 사용해서 분석하였다. 전통적인 분석 도구인 다차원척도법이나 군집분석과 달리 중심성 척도를 통해서는 저작물에 반영된 개별 저자의 입지와 영향력에 대한 구체적인 분석이 가능하였다. 특히 삼각매개중심성 척도는 측정 범위의 조절이 자유로와서 지역적 중심성과 전역적 중심성을 모두 파악할 수 있는 것으로 나타났다.

• Journal of Information Management
• /
• v.43 no.1
• /
• pp.159-185
• /
• 2012

The purposes of this study were to identify core journals for pharmaceutical researches in Korea and to examine the research domains of Korean pharmaceutical researchers. Journal citation frequency analysis and journal co-citation analysis were performed on the research papers of Korean pharmaceutical researchers. Korean researchers' citation data were gathered from SCOPUS for foreign journals and KSCD for domestic journals. 116 core journals were identified through citation frequency analysis and journal relationships were suggested as a pathfinder network of journals. Factor analysis on journal correlation matrix resulted in 18 subject domains and related journal lists were also given.

• Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society
• /
• v.12 no.3
• /
• pp.471-498
• /
• 2009

The ability to judge a country's scientific standing is vital for the governments and businesses that must decide scientific priorities and funding. In this paper, we analyze the output and outcomes from research investment over the recent years, to measure the quality of scientific research on national scales and to set it in an international context. There are many ways to evaluate the quality of scientific research, but few have proved satisfactory. To measure the quantity and quality of science in different nations, we analyzed the numbers of published research papers and their citations. The number of citations per paper is a useful measure of the impact of a nation's research output. Essential at a were acquired from SCI database by Thomson Scientific, which indexes more than 8,000 journals, representing most significant materials in science and engineering. The purpose of this paper is to evaluate and compare the output and outcomes among nations in a variety of viewpoints and criteria. One of the implications in response to the result of analysis is that sustainable economic development in highly competitive world markets requires a direct engagement in the generation of knowledge. Even modest improvement in healthcare, clean water, sanitation, food, and transport need capabilities in engineering, technology, and medicine beyond many countries' reach. Nations exporting natural resources such as gold and oil can import technology and expertise, but only until these resources are exhausted. For them, sustainability should imply investment in alternative agricultural and technological capabilities through improvements in their skills base. A strong science base does not necessarily leat to wealth generation. However, strength in science has additional benefits for individual nations, and for the world as a whole.

• Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society
• /
• v.44 no.3
• /
• pp.405-428
• /
• 2013

This study tried to explore the relation between research networks(coauthor network, author co-citation network, author bibliographic coupling network) and research performance of Records and Archives Management study in Korea. For the analysis, three basic types of network centrality and three indicators of research performance are used. The summary of this study is as follows: Firstly, there are relations between three centralities and three indicators of research performance in the coauthor network. Secondly, there are relations between betweenness centrality and research performance in the author co-citation/author bibliographic coupling networks. Thirdly, there are relations between three centralities in the each research network. Fourthly, there are not high relations between all centralities of the three research networks.

• Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science
• /
• v.50 no.1
• /
• pp.513-532
• /
• 2016

The purpose of this study is to gain a better understanding of undergraduate citation behavior and to measure the contribution which an academic library makes in the academic writing of students. Citations in 80 student papers submitted in the academic paper competition was analyzed for types of items cited and the number of items in the library collection, etc. The findings indicate: 1) the level of undergraduates' citation knowledge is very low, 2) undergraduates prefer web resources (44.9%) to such academic resources as books, journal articles, theses or dissertation, and 3) undergraduates find academic resources in their academic library. Upon these findings, this study suggests that academic library staff should intervene to enhance undergraduate academic writing skills and to develope of educational material, including how to search for and cite reliable resources.

• Journal of the Korean Society for information Management
• /
• v.28 no.2
• /
• pp.97-115
• /
• 2011

A large and reliable citation database is necessary to identify and analyze citation behavior of Korean researchers in science and technology. Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information (KISTI) built the Korea Science Citation Database (KSCD), and have provided Korea Science Citation Index (KSCI) and Korea Journal Citation Reports (KJCR) services. In this article, citing behavior of Korean scientists on Korean journals was examined by using the KSCD that covers 459 Korean core journals. This research dealt with (1) statistical numeric information of journals in KSCD, (2) analysis of document types cited, (3) ratio of domestic to international documents cited and ratio of citing different disciplines, (4) analysis on immediacy index, peak time, and half-life of cited documents, and (5) analysis on impact of journals based on KJCR citation indicators. From this research, we could find the immediacy citation rate (average 2.36%), peak-time (average 1.7 years) and half-life (average 5.2 years) of cited journals in Korea. We also found that the average journal self-citation rate is more than 50% in every field. In sum, citing behavior of Korean scientists on Korean journals was comprehensively identified from this research.