• Journal of the Korea Convergence Society
• /
• v.12 no.6
• /
• pp.91-97
• /
• 2021

This study investigated the local humanities ecosystem and the application of local humanities. A plan(measures) was suggested to vitalize the humanities ecosystem for local residents through this stduy. First, We looked at the support measures for local humanities. Second, we tried to find a measure to utilize research manpower for the development of local humanities. Third, We study ways to train researchers for the development of the local humanities ecosystem. Fourth, In this study, we analyzed the contents of the job creation plan for the development of local humanities.This analysis aims to establish a support plan for vitalizing research on the regional humanities ecosystem that reflects the local culture and regional specificity.

• Proceedings of the Korean Society for Information Management Conference
• /
• 2016.08a
• /
• pp.9-13
• /
• 2016

한국학술지인용색인 KCI의 인용지표가 본격 서비스된 것은 2008년 이후로서 최근 2014년 인용지수가 발표되었다. 7년 동안의 영향력 지수를 비롯하여 KCI가 제공하는 IF 지수와 자기인용율 등의 인용지표 변화 추세를 인문학, 사회과학, 예술체육, 복합학의 4개 인문사회 계열과 자연과학, 공학, 농수해양, 의약학의 4개 공학 계열로 나누어 분석하여 국내 학술지 생태계의 변화를 부분적으로 살펴보고자 하였다.

• Journal of the Korean Society for information Management
• /
• v.41 no.1
• /
• pp.537-560
• /
• 2024

In an academic ecosystem evolving into open science, open peer review is gaining attention as a way to enhance transparency and openness in scholarly communication. This study examines the adoption of open peer review components in 118 open access journals that have implemented open peer review, and their characteristics by publisher type, country/continent, language, and discipline. Open peer review has been implemented in a variety of ways, including making review reports or pre-prints publicly available or disclosing the identities of authors and reviewers to each other. We also found differences in the components adopted across disciplines. It appears that commercial publishers, which account for a large proportion of publisher types, have generally adopted it, and it is mainly published in English in European countries. By discipline, we find more open peer review in the medical and natural sciences, which traditionally aim for open scholarly communication and fewer journals in the multidisciplinary and humanities. This provides insights into the adoption of open peer review by journals, as well as a better understanding of the characteristics of the academic community in terms of their adoption of open peer review.