• 한국사회정책
• /
• v.20 no.3
• /
• pp.9-46
• /
• 2013

The degree of delegation related to the social security acts is involved in the candidate selection methods and the standing committee system. The social security acts with a small amount of delegation have an affinity with the bottom-up selection methods and the standing committee to guarantee long term in office. In Germany, the bottom-up selection method which guarantees the right of party members to nominate candidates and the standing committee to guarantee long term in office have an affinity with the Social Acts with less delegation. But the social security acts with a large number of delegation have an affinity with the top-down selection methods and the standing committee not to guarantee long term in office. In Korea, the top-down selection method in which the central headquarter of the party dominates the selection process, and the standing committee whose members are to be selected every two years have an affinity with the Social Security Acts with the excessive delegation.

• Proceedings of the Korea Contents Association Conference
• /
• 2006.11a
• /
• pp.382-386
• /
• 2006

본 연구에서는 지방의회 재출범 15년을 평가해 보고 충청지역(대전,충남,충북) 전문가그룹의 인식을 토대로 지방의회의 발전방안을 정책기능강화 측면과 주민참여활성화 측면으로 나누어 모색하였다. 정책기능의 강화를 위해서 본 연구에서는 전문 위원실 역할강화, 정책관련부서의 신설, 지방의원의 외유내실화, 상임위원회의 기준완화 등을 제안하였다. 그리고 지방의정에의 시민참여 활성화방안으로는 인터넷이나 케이블TV를 통한 의회활동중개, 의사일정의 고정과 적극적인 홍보, 주요의사 결정과정에 자문위원회 및 심의위원회의 대폭확대, 유급시민모니터링제도의 도입, 상임위원회에 민간위원의 참여(결정권 없이) 필요성 정도, 휴일의회 및 야간의회 개최 등의 방안을 제안하였다.

• Korean Journal of Legislative Studies
• /
• v.15 no.2
• /
• pp.159-185
• /
• 2009

This study aims to examine whether committee preference and negotiation group affiliation have an effect on proposals and passages of legislators' bills. Previous studies points out predominances and reflections of partisan interests, but analytic result shows legislators' preferences work on introductions and passages of bills through committee and negotiation group as assembly institutions. The rates of proposals and passages were high in the committee that legislators would like to belong to. The same result was found in negotiation group affiliation. However, active activities of legislators works in only their committees, not in a general meeting. This result shows that committee and negotiation group are significant institutions of national assembly.

• Korean Journal of Legislative Studies
• /
• v.24 no.2
• /
• pp.67-99
• /
• 2018

This study analyzes the revision bills of the National Assembly Law in the 19th National Assembly in which the National Assembly Advancement Act was enacted, with the question "who are involved in the revision of the procedural rules, and what motivates them?" The cosponsor network analysis focusing on primary sponsors of the revision bills shows that the network was constructed by party affiliations. A small number of members with high degree centrality attempted to cooperate with each other at the cosponsoring stage, but the legislation did not pass through the related committee. In addition, this study tests the four competitive hypotheses (the committee hypothesis, the distributive politics hypothesis, the ideological distance hypothesis, and the partisan affiliation hypothesis) about the motivation to propose amendments by using the regression models which include newly measured variables. Only the committee hypothesis and the partisan affiliation hypothesis are empirically supported. This implies that partisan consideration is still significant in amending the National Assembly Law even after the National Assembly Advancement Act, and thus party leaders' willingness to seek bipartisan compromises is at the heart of problem-solving.