• Digital Contents
• /
• no.4 s.47
• /
• pp.62-65
• /
• 1997

JOIS(JICST On-Line Information System)은 일본의 과학기술 발전을 위해 설립된 일본과학기술정보센터(JST : Japan Science and Technology Coporation : http;//www.jst-c.go.jp)에서 일본의 과학기술, 의학 등에 관한 정보를 제공하기 위하여 1976년에 세워진 데이터뱅크이다.

• Journal of the Korean Society for information Management
• /
• v.22 no.2 s.56
• /
• pp.23-39
• /
• 2005

The purpose of this study was to analyzes the present conditions of reference databases which is constructed from Korea. The object which is used in analysis concludes on KSCI( Korean Science Citation Index) of KISTI, KCI(Korean Citation Index) of KRF, KoMCI(Korean Medical Citation Index) of Korean Academy of Medical Sciences, and reference database of KOSEF. And then, this paper proposes the activation plan for reference database construction based on this analysis result. The proposed plan will be able to apply with fundamental data of the system, policy and technical direction for reference database construction.

• Journal of the Korean Society for information Management
• /
• v.16 no.1
• /
• pp.137-156
• /
• 1999

The DIALOG's SCISearch database was searched, and the number of SCI Korean medical papers in each medical specialty was measured by document type and by publication year for the 1990-1995 period. The growth of SCI Korean medical papers was examined during this period. The percentage contribution of Korean medical papers to SCI database. and the SCI(mainstream) publication productivity ratio were analyzed for each medical specialty. The data obtained in this study for the early 1990s was compared with the data representing the 1980s. In addition, the fame research methodology was applied to the SCI Korean chemistry papers, and the result was compared with medicine. The purpose of these analysis is to investigate the extent and growth of mainstream publication activity of Korean medicine.

• Journal of Information Management
• /
• v.36 no.3
• /
• pp.183-193
• /
• 2005

Korean Academy of Medical Sciences began developing Korean Medical Citaton Index(KoMCI) database in 2002, and has announced the impact factors of Korean medical journals published since 2000. In July 2005, Korea Research Foundation also announced the KCI impact factor of journals covering all subject areas for the 2003 and 2004. We compared the impact factor(IF), impact factor excluding self-citation(ZIF), and self-citation impact factor(SIF) of KoMCI 2004 and KCI 2004 in order to disclose why there is such a great difference in the values of impact factors between two databases. Out of 72 medical journals in both database, 59 journals were compared after excluding the missing data in KCI. Mean IF of KoMCI 2004 was 0.2 and that of KCI 2004 was 0.03(p=0.0000). Mean ZIF of KoMCI was 0.06 and that of KCI was 0.01(p=0.000). Mean SIF of KoMCI was 0.139 and that of KCI was 0.02(p=0.0000). We presumed that the major difference in the impact factor values was originated from the fact that KCI does not control the authority of journal names cited in the references. We strongly recommend that it is necessary to control the authority especially if Korea Research Foundation wants to ensure the validity and reliability of KCI data in the evaluation of korean journals.

• Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society
• /
• v.36 no.2
• /
• pp.141-163
• /
• 2005

Today. the value of the references comes to be high and the reference database construction is increasing. But. the descriptive regulations of the reference which it presents from scholarly journals different with each other. Also, the researchers probably does not recognize a descriptive regulations of reference. It is likely that the effective construction of reference database is very difficult. So, the purpose of this study analyzes the differences of a descriptive regulations for reference and presents the plan for standardization of a descriptive regulations.

• Journal of Information Management
• /
• v.25 no.2
• /
• pp.31-60
• /
• 1994

General branches of science and engineering now enjoy being substantially repleted in their databases. However, comparing the databases of such branches with chemistry or medical science and pharmacology, the strata do not seem to be fully equipped yet. As a matter of fact, the variety of such databases in practical application is still somewhat limited. Moreover, these databases are, with a few exceptions, prepared abroad. In this paper varieties and features of databases now available on the market for each database service system, as well as crucial points for practical use are introduced. At present, it is focussed more or less on the application of bibliographical information. Yet, it would be inevitable to equip them with factual data in order to increase the efficiency of research and development activities. Of course, it is still not easy to solve problems for better profitability and higher technical achievement. The author wishes to emphasize the necessity to fully equip the commercial factual database for said branches as quickly as possible.

• Journal of Biomedical Engineering Research
• /
• v.23 no.6
• /
• pp.431-436
• /
• 2002

The purpose of this study was to develop an integration protocol of Nuclear Medicine image with a commercial PACS. Two independent local networks. PACS network and Nuclear Medicine network, were connected using a Nuclear Medicine DICOM gateway A DICOM converter Program was developed to convert Interfile 3.3. which is used in nuclear medicine scanners in our hospital. to DICOM 3.0. The Program converts Interfile format images to those of DICOM format and also transfers converted DICOM files to PACS DICOM gateway. PACS DICOM gateway compares and matches the DICOM image information with patient information in Hospital Information System and then saves to PACS database. The transfer protocol was designed to be able to transfer Interfile. screen dumped file. and also scanned file. We successfully transferred Nuclear Medicine images to PACS. Images transferred by Interfile transfer protocol could be further processed using various tools in PACS. The graphs, numerical information and comments could be conveniently transferred by screen dumped file. The image in a hard copy can be transferred after scanning using an ordinary scanner. The developed protocol can easily transfer Nuclear Medicine images to PACS in various forms with low cost.

• Journal of the Korean Society for information Management
• /
• v.17 no.1
• /
• pp.49-65
• /
• 2000

The availability and use (citedness) of Korean medical journals are measured based on the bibliometric data of 82 journals evaluated by the Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors between 1997 and 1999. A Korean medical journal is held on the average by one half of Korean medical libraries investigated. Only 10 journals (12.2%) are covered in any of 36 abstract and index databases in the field of medicine searchable through DIALOG. The journal self-citation rate is 3.402%. 1.092% of papers are cited at least once by SCI journal papers within 3 years after publication. The average SCI impact factor of Korean medical journals is 0.111, However, the impact factor of MEDLINE or SCISearch journals is 10 times higher. The results show that the Korean medical journals are not easily available domestically and internationally. They are hardly cited by Korean colleagues or by foreign scholars either.

• 대한핵의학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 1997.05a
• /
• pp.190-190
• /
• 1997

• Proceedings of the Korean Society of Medical Physics Conference
• /
• 2003.09a
• /
• pp.57-57
• /
• 2003

목적 : 미국 NRC 의 위험도 평가 방법론(NUREG/CR-6642)에 국내에서 시행되는 고선량율 근접치료의 표준입력 자료를 대입하여 고선량율 근접치료시 위험도를 정량적으로 산출하고 그 값을 비교하고자 한다. 대상 및 방법 : 고선량율 근접치료 시스템에 대한 위험도 평가를 위해 국내에서 고선량율 근접치료를 시행하고 있는 17개 의료기관으로부터 방사성동위원소의 설치와 폐기시의 방사능, 선원의 유형, 연간 총 치료회수 등 기초 자료를 수집하였다. 이로부터 방사성동위원소의 평균세기 연간 치료회수 등을 미국 NRC의 위험도 평가 방법론의 데이터베이스에 입력하여 고선량율 근접치료의 직무별, 피폭인의 종류, 정상상태와 사고 등의 형태에 따라 그 위험도를 구하였다. 결과 : 국내 고선량율 근접치료의 위험도는 미국 NRC의 위험도 평가 방법론에 따른 데이터베이스의 입력 결과 일반인의 정상상태와 사고 그리고 방사선종사자의 정상상태와 사고 시에 따라 그 위험도가 1.52-01, 2.96-03, 8.64-01, 3.32-02 rem/yr로 산출되었고 그 값을 미국 NRC의 값과 비교하였다. 결론 : 고선량율 근접치료 시 미국 NRC의 위험도 결과보다는 국내의 경우 수배 정도 높게 계산되었고 일반인과 방사선종사자, 정상상태와 사고, 직무별 패턴 등은 동일한 것으로 간주된다.