• Korean Medical Education Review
• /
• v.24 no.3
• /
• pp.179-179
• /
• 2022

• Korean Medical Education Review
• /
• v.8 no.1
• /
• pp.35-54
• /
• 2006

의사에게 있어 자신의 적성과 능력에 부합하는 세부 전공을 선택하는 것은 자신의 자아실현뿐만 아니라 환자들에게도 중요한 의미를 갖는다. 이것은 의과대학생들의 전공 선택을 위해 의과대학 재학 중에 이루어지는 진로개발의 중요성을 시사한다. 이 글은 의과대학생 개개인의 적성과 소질에 따른 전공 선택을 어떻게 지도할 수 있는지 단계별 진로지도 전략에 대해 고찰하였다. 전공 선택 지도의 첫 번째 단계는 자기평가이다. 자기평가는 자신의 적성과 능력에 맞는 전공을 선택하기 위해 스스로에 대한 정보를 모으고 이해하는 과정이다. 두 번째는 전공탐색 단계이다. 이 단계는 자신의 적성과 능력에 부합할 가능성이 높은 전공과목에 대한 정보를 수집하는 것이다. 세 번째는 전공 선택 단계이다. 이 과정은 학생 스스로에 대한 자기평가 결과 및 전공에 대한 탐색 결과에 기초하여 자신이 어떤 분야에 더 적합한가에 대한 의사결정을 하는 과정이다. 전공 선택을 위한 접근 방법의 마지막은 전공 영역의 수련을 위해서 자신이 결정한 전공 선택을 이행하는 단계이다. 이 단계에서는 자신이 선택한 전공영역, 그리고 전공의 수련교육과정을 제공하는 교육기관에 응시원서를 제출하고, 면접을 실시하는 과정이 포함된다. 의과대학생들이 자신의 적성과 소질에 따른 전공 선택과 의과대학생 개개인의 선택의 문제를 넘어 의료 인력의 수급, 의료서비스의 질적인 수준과 밀접하게 관련되어 있다. 그러므로 의과대학은 대학의 책무성 수행차원에서 학생들의 가치관 확립과 진로지도를 위한 체계적인 학생 진로지도 프로그램을 개발하고 학생들을 적극적으로 지원해야 한다.

• Korean Medical Education Review
• /
• v.25 no.2
• /
• pp.83-83
• /
• 2023

• Journal of Digital Convergence
• /
• v.14 no.8
• /
• pp.363-370
• /
• 2016

This study aimed to evaluate correlation between self-evaluation factors and academic achievement of medical students according to introduction of explanation meeting in cadaveric dissection. The students explained cadaveric structure to health allied sciences students and discussed with each other. Just after the meeting, 102 medical students filled out a self-reported questionnaire on impact of self-evaluation factors and communication. The data were analyzed by frequency analysis, t-test and analysis of variance. Regardless of their gender, age, previous experience, the majority of the students gave high scores in all of self-evaluation factors. Among them, linkage with major and verbal communication factor were closely related to their academic achievement(p<0.05). The verbal and non-verbal communication factors also had a high correlation of 0.580(p<0.01). The explanation meeting provided a chance to learn further with positive attitude to medical students and motivated them academically.

• The Journal of the Korea Contents Association
• /
• v.22 no.4
• /
• pp.547-557
• /
• 2022

Online learning at a medical school was evaluated and improved based on the results of the evaluation and the principles of online learning environments design. The purpose of this study was to compare the results of online learning satisfaction between semesters from medical students and professors. To evaluate online learning, satisfaction surveys for an online learning platform, student participation, learning methods, learning contents, student assessments, and learning supports were developed and distributed to research participants. 223 students and 37 professors participated for the 1st semester, and 218 students and 49 professors participated for the 2nd semester, and paired t-tests were used for the analysis. Student satisfaction for the online learning platform, learning methods, learning contents, and learning supports were positively changed. However, the differences in the satisfaction for the student participation and student assessments were not statistically significant. In particular, students' satisfaction in basic medical sciences and clinical medicine periods decreased, whereas students' satisfaction in preclinical medicine and clinical clerkship periods increased. Based on the results, this study will contribute to the improvement of online learning at medical schools.

• Korean Medical Education Review
• /
• v.24 no.3
• /
• pp.205-214
• /
• 2022

The purpose of this study was to analyze the results of a study on the psychological state, lifestyle, self-management ability, and academic adaptation of medical students, and to present examples of improvement of a student support center based on the results. A medical school in Daegu has been surveying the living conditions of students every year for 6 years since 2016. More than 60% of medical students experienced depression and more than 70% experienced stress, but these rates have significantly improved over the past 5 years. There were many cases of drinking or smoking to relieve stress, but the frequency of drinking recently decreased substantially. Some students had difficulties in emotional regulation (11.5%) and time management (16.6%), and challenges in planning and self-management increased significantly during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. The satisfaction and adaptability of medical students are high, but the number of students who are not satisfied with but negative response rate is 2%-3% in every year. However, satisfaction has significantly increased in tandem with curriculum changes and COVID-19. Based on these data, the counseling system was reorganized to support psychological stability, the medical humanities curriculum was improved, and changes in actual quality of life were induced by developing and operating non-curricular programs. Furthermore, standardized questionnaires will be developed and data from many medical schools will be shared, which is expected to support medical students more effectively.

• Korean Medical Education Review
• /
• v.17 no.1
• /
• pp.1-4
• /
• 2015

• Korean Medical Education Review
• /
• v.8 no.1
• /
• pp.23-33
• /
• 2006

의학교육은 학생들에 대한 교육과 평가만으로 구성되지 않는다. 학생들이 그러한 교육을 모두 잘 이수하고 졸업할 수 있도록 잘 지도해 주는 것까지를 포함한다. 의학교육에 있어 이러한 지도가 필요한 이유는 의대생들의 학습과 생활에 문제가 자주 발생하기 때문이다. 이에 본 연구에서는 2005년도에 본 의과대학에서 이루어진 총104건의 상담사례를 분석하여 그 문제와 대안을 제시하였다. 나타난 문제로는 불완전한 교육과 극단적 내부경쟁, 학생들의 집단 학습적 행동, 시간 관리 및 학습방법의 문제, 불안과 우울의 문제, 열등감의 문제, 자기개발과 자기실현에서의 불안, 삶의 다양한 문제들과 가치관 형성의 어려움(이성교제, 가족관계, 학교 내 대인관계 등) 등이었다. 이에 대한 해결방안으로 다음과 같은 다섯 가지가 제안 되었다. 즉 학생들에 대한 "의대에서 공부하는 방법" 교육, 새로운 의대 학습 문화의 창출지원, 전공의 선발에 있어 다면적 평가 시스템의 도입, 상담을 담당해 주시는 교수들과 멘토(mentor)의 필요, 가치관 지향적인 의학교육의 필요이다.

• Korean Medical Education Review
• /
• v.25 no.2
• /
• pp.174-183
• /
• 2023

Educational evaluation involves data collection and the analysis of various education-related factors to make decisions that improve educational quality. Systematic educational evaluation is essential for enhancing the quality of education. This study reports a case of student-conducted process evaluation of a medical school's student support system and the procedure for devising improvement plans. Sixteen Inje University College of Medicine students participated in the Education Evaluation Committee (IUCM-EEC) to understand the educational improvement process as learners and actively achieve improvement. The Quality Improvement Committee of the Inje University College of Medicine (IUCM-QIC) decided to reform its student support system based on a previous educational evaluation in 2019. The evaluation of the student support system was conducted for 10 months in 2021 by the student subcommittee, under the guidance of the IUCM-EEC. The CIPP (context-input-process-product) evaluation model was used for a systematic evaluation. Accordingly, the subcommittee developed evaluation criteria and indicators, and analyzed relevant data collected from surveys and the previous literature. For further recommendations and revision ideas, the student subcommittee members interviewed faculty members from six other medical schools and also conducted a focus group interview with the dean and vice deans of IUCM. Finally, the student subcommittee submitted a report to the IUCM-QIC. Communication with various stakeholders is essential for a successful evaluation process. In this case, students, as key stakeholders in education, evaluated the student support system. Their active participation helped improve their understanding of the evaluation process.

• Journal of Korean Academy of Rural Health Nursing
• /
• v.14 no.1
• /
• pp.1-7
• /
• 2019

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to describe nursing students' perception of well-dying and knowledge for Advanced Directives. Methods: Nursing students from one university were selected for the research and a survey was carried out during March and April, 2019. A total of 133 nursing students participated in this study. Data were analyzed using t-test, ANOVA, $x^2$ test with SPSS statistics 21.0. Results: According to the results, the mean score for perception of well dying was $3.00{\pm}0.31$, and knowledge for Advance Directives was $9.05{\pm}2.20$. Perception of well-dying was significantly different by grade group. Knowledge for Advance Directives was significantly different by pre-education experience. Conclusion: In order to improve the nursing students' knowledge for advanced directives, it is necessary to develop education program and provide them through the total school years.