• Journal of Food Hygiene and Safety
• /
• v.19 no.1
• /
• pp.38-48
• /
• 2004

This study was performed to investigate knowledge, attitudes and related behavior on the food hygiene and safety management of school food-service programs among mothers and to find factors affecting their knowledge, attitudes and behavior. A self-administered questionnaire was offered to a random sample of 301 mothers who have children attending elementary schools in one region of Korea. The survey was carried out over a two-month period (April-May,2001). They had lower behavior scores compared to the scores of knowledge and attitudes (p〈0.05). The micro levels of the knowledge, attitudes and behavior scores also showed the same tendency. Logistic regression analysis showed that mothers' education level affected their knowledge and attitudes, while the participating activity in school food-service programs affected their behavior the most frequently. Pearson's correlation analysis confirmed that the knowledge and attitude scores were significantly correlated (r=0.61404, p〈0.001). The results indicate that the knowledge and attitude levels of mothers regarding the food hygiene and safety of school food-service programs were good, however, their behavior levels were not satisfactory. The findings highlight the importance of participating programs in school food-service programs to close gaps between the behavior and knowledge or attitudes of mothers and to improve their behavior levels.

• Korean Journal of Culture and Social Issue
• /
• v.11 no.spc
• /
• pp.133-161
• /
• 2005

The present paper examines trust, interpersonal relationship, and civil society in Scandinavia and East Asia. In the first section, the concepts of trust and democracy are defined. In the second section, the cultural transformations that paved the way for the development of democracy in the West and Scandinavia are reviewed. In the third section, the basis of trust and democracy in East Asia, focusing on Confucianism, is reviewed. In the fourth section, a review of an empirical study conducted with a national sample in Denmark, Sweden, Japan, and Korea is presented. The results indicate that both the Scandinavian and East Asian respondents support the basic ideas of liberal democracy and trust close ingroup members. East Asian respondents are less likely than Scandinavian respondents to trust their colleagues and outgroup members and much less likely to trust political and government institutions. Scandinavian respondents prefer tolerant leaders who lead by ideas, while Koreans prefer strong paternalistic and moral leaders. Japanese respondents are less supportive of paternalistic leaders. Overall, results indicate that in Scandinavia and East Asia, although the basic ideas about democracy and human rights are similar, the methods of implementing these ideas are different. When compared with Scandinavia, there is much lower transparency and accountability in East Asia. In the final section, the challenges that the modern democracies face are discussed.

• Proceedings of the Korean Association for Survey Research Conference
• /
• 2001.11a
• /
• pp.111-122
• /
• 2001

본 논문에서는 기업 등에서 사원이나 고객을 대상으로 민감한 정보를 얻기 위한 조사에서 응답자들이 정직하게 응답하기를 거리는 질문들에 대하여 응답자의 비밀을 노출시키지 않고서 보다 정확한 정보를 얻을 수 있는 방안으로 간접응답기법인 확률화응답기법을 인터넷 상에서 사용할 수 있도록 구현하고자 한다. 본 시스템은 DB 환경에 바탕을 두어 기존의 온라인 설문조사 시스템과 연계하여 자료를 공유할 수 있을 뿐만 아니라 독립된 스팟 서베이(spot survey)가 가능하도록 구현하고자 한다.

• 한국데이터정보과학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 2001.10a
• /
• pp.79-86
• /
• 2001

본 논문에서는 민감한 양적 정보를 얻기 위한 조사에서 응답자들이 정직하게 응답하기를 꺼리는 질문들에 대하여 응답자의 비밀을 노출시키기 않고서 양적 정보에 대한 보다 정확한 정보를 얻을 수 있는 양적 확률화응답기법을 인터넷 상에서 사용할 수 있도록 구현하고자 한다. 본 시스템에 DB 환경에 바탕을 두어 기존의 온라인 설문조사 시스템 및 질적 확률화응답기법과 연계하여 자료를 공유할 수 있을 뿐만 아니라 독립된 스팟 서베이(spot survey)가 가능하도록 구현하고자 한다.

• Communications for Statistical Applications and Methods
• /
• v.3 no.2
• /
• pp.139-150
• /
• 1996

확률화응답기법은 민감한 사항에 대한 모비율의 효율적인 추정과 응답자에 대한 충분한 보호수준 제공이라는 두 가지 측면을 동시에 추구하는 통계조사기법이다. 본 연구에서는 기법에서 적용된 질문선택확률이 이와 같은 두 가지 측면에 미치는 영향을 정리하고, 이런 관점에서 최근에 제시된 2단계 확률화응답 기법들은 기존의 기법에서 단순히 질문선택확률구조만을 수정한 것으로 해석될 수 있으며, 따라서 효율성 측면에서 본질적으로 기존의 방법과 동일한 기법임을 보였다.

• Journal of the korean veterinary medical association
• /
• v.24 no.7
• /
• pp.401-406
• /
• 1988

• Korean Business Review
• /
• v.21 no.1
• /
• pp.19-36
• /
• 2008

This study examines respondents' perception of influence of corporate social responsibility on the corporate effectiveness. Also it investigates the relationship between Machiavellianism and corporate social responsibility. Survey data were collected from undergraduate business students, Advance Management Program attendants and business professors of Hallym University. The results show that they perceive corporate social responsibility's positive contribution to profitability and success. Older respondents thought more positively about contributions of corporate social responsibility to short-run success than younger ones. Also Machiavellian scores of older ones were lower than those of younger ones. The findings indicate that Machiavellianism influences directly respondents' perception of corporate social responsibility. It implies that understanding of human nature is important to induce corporate managers to be socially responsible.

• Journal of the Korean Institute of Gas
• /
• v.13 no.2
• /
• pp.36-40
• /
• 2009

In this study, we surveyed 544 drivers, who had taken the education course for autogas car drivers, to figure out their safety awareness status including the recognition of hazards of gas leaking from autogas cars and response attitude toward them. As a result of the survey, we found out that 63% of the responders recognized the hazards of gas leakage and 79% preferred parking in the aboveground areas. For the necessity of introducing restrictions on autogas cars parking in underground lots, 58% of all responders answered yes while 71% of the responders aged over fifties and 73% of them who responded to have known the hazards of parking in underground answered in the affirmative. Furthermore, we found out that responders who had recognized the hazards preferred aboveground parking areas, and the responders who had preferred the aboveground recognized the hazards of parking autogas cars underground and felt the necessity of restricting them from parking in underground relatively high. Through the analysis of these results, we can analyse that the drivers who are aware of the hazards of gas leakage have higher safety attitude for hazards than the other drivers who are not aware of them.

• Korean Journal of Environment and Ecology
• /
• v.8 no.2
• /
• pp.160-166
• /
• 1995

Visitors to Chuwangsan National Park were survayed from August 3 to 5 n 1994. During this time, 346 visitors were contacted. Of those individuals, 65% were males. 63% of respondents reported that they had gone as far as college. 48% were 20 years of age. 97% of the survey respondents had experience to visit other national parks. The largest percentage of respondents were reported that they visited Chuwangsan Nat'1 Park for enjoying natural landscape. In group type, 50% were traveling with their family and 36% with their friends. In activity characteristics, 51% were day-time visitors, and 18% mentioned carrying in their on food. Generally most respondents were very interested in the environmental problem in national parks. The majority of visitors perceived that the environment of Chuwangsan Nat'1 Park were good enough. In six types of normative violations, the major reasons of littering were unintentional violation and releaser-cue violation. Most respondents were not likely to intervene to stop other visitors' depreciative behavior (Bystander intervention behavior). In two dilemmas, the more likely the intention to obey a regulation the less likely the intention to disobey a regulation, and vice-versa.

• The Journal of the Korea Contents Association
• /
• v.20 no.2
• /
• pp.435-450
• /
• 2020

How do Korean people recognize major welfare policies of the Moon Jae-in government? Using a survey of 1,000 adults conducted in December 2018, this study examines what the public thinks about major issues related to welfare policies and what factors are related to variations in their opinions regarding the welfare policies. Results show that the public recognized the roles of government in providing welfare in a positive way. The positive opinion on expanding the coverage of National Health Insurance was the highest. Regarding the resolutions of fiscal problems of the National Pension Plan, there were substantial oppositions to reforms such as insurance premium increase, benefits cut, and increase in the age of receipt of pension benefits. Both efficiency and equality were perceived as important when government makes decision for allocating budgets. Only one-third of respondents agreed Korean government contributed to promoting the happiness of Korean people. Based on these findings, implications for developing welfare policies were discussed.