• 한국전자파학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국전자파학회 2001년도 종합학술발표회 논문집 Vol.11 No.1
• /
• pp.300-303
• /
• 2001

개방단말 동축선 프로브는 임의의 매질에 접촉하여 복소 유전율을 구하므로 사용이 용이한 측정법이다. 복소 유전율의 측정 과정은 두 단계로 구성된다. 먼저 프로브의 개구면을 미지의 매질에 접촉시켜서 반사계수를 측정한다. 다음에는 반사계수를 환산모델에 대입하여 복소 유전율을 구한다. 그러나 실제 측정시 발생하는 오차들에 대해 취약하다는 단점을 가지고 있다. 정확성을 떨어뜨리는 주요 오차 요인으로는 프로브의 개구면과 측정매질 사이의 공극으로 인한 불완전 접촉오타와 프로브의 제작 한계로 인한 오차를 들 수 있다. 본 논문에서는 이런 오차상황에서 유한 차분 시간영역법으로 반사계수를 계산하고나서 환산모델에 의해 복소 유전율로 환산함으로써 오차에 대한 환산모델들간의 안정성을 살펴보고자 한다.

• 한국소음진동공학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국소음진동공학회 2012년도 춘계학술대회 논문집
• /
• pp.763-768
• /
• 2012

Active window system which can reduce the environmental noises, such as traffic noise and construction noise, from an open window into a room was proposed in the previous works. The key idea of the proposed active window system was that the control sources are approximately collocated with the primary noise source in terms of the acoustic power for global noise reduction throughout the interior room. Moreover, because it is important not to intrude into the living space in the building environment, no error sensors were used and an open-loop control method using control sources at the window frame and the reference sensors outside the room was used for the proposed system. The open-loop control gain was calculated by the interior room model assumed as the semi-infinite space, and the interior sound field was estimated by Rayleigh integral equation under the baffled window model assumption. However, windows with a finite thickness should were considered for the calculation of the open-loop control gain of the active window system since these are representative of most window cases. Therefore, the finite thickness window model based on the Sgard's model was derived and the open-loop control gain using the interior sound field estimated by that model was calculated for active window system. To compare the performance of these two models, a scale-model experiment was performed in an anechoic chamber according to noise source directions. Experimental results showed that the performance for the thickness window model is better than the baffled window model as the angle with respect to the perpendicular direction is larger.