• Journal of Science and Technology Studies
• /
• v.6 no.2 s.12
• /
• pp.131-183
• /
• 2006

The Korean genetics and genomics reveal a firm willingness to participate in and contribute to the production of creative scientific knowledge at a world level at present, though they have short past histories of introduction from the Western counterparts and those of education for the next generations. But the Korean genetics and genomics have been developed in a fragmented and biased manner. By reconfiguring the various research projects of genomics into the Genome Project of Korea, which reflect a worldly trend in life science, but have been established in a scattered fashion in Korea, and incorporating some neglected areas of genetics, such as human genetics and theoretical and population genetics which can be reconstructed in a new way, a genetics-genomics research system can be formulated on the multi-tiered perspective of concept, knowledge, and institution, while the system being a subsystem of the national research system of life science in Korea. Innovation can be pursued in the systematic practice through a culturalist strategy. The culturalist strategy with the practice based on the research system consists of 1) intensification of fundamentalness of genetics and genomics, 2) advancement of communitarianism in geneticist-genomicist community, 3) research on the cultural bio-species along with the promotion of scientific arts and culture, and 4)formation of the Korean science studies of genetics-genomics and the diffusion of the knowledge produced. The first two strategy components are the ones that intends to bring out changes in the structural aspect of the scientist community in Korea. The third is the one that attempts to magnify the interface between the scientist community and the Korean society at large and increase its connectivity between both, while the fourth is the one that has an intentionality toward the Korean society outside of the scientist community. This culturalist strategy is intended to increase the cultural constructivity of the genetics-genomics research system in Korea.

• 한국과학기술학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 2006.10a
• /
• pp.239-252
• /
• 2006

• KOGO NEWS
• /
• v.6 no.3
• /
• pp.8-9
• /
• 2006

• KOGO NEWS
• /
• v.6 no.4
• /
• pp.8-13
• /
• 2006

• Journal of Science and Technology Studies
• /
• v.5 no.1 s.9
• /
• pp.55-92
• /
• 2005

The factors contributing to the formation of an important scientific concept in South Korea and its circulation in the society are the scientific knowledge that had been already formed, matured, and established in the U.S.A, Europe and Japan and has been introduced into Korea, and the institutions that have been formed during the recent modernization in South Korea. The concept of 'genetic information' cannot be an exception in this context. The concept of genetic information is the one that has been extended and intensified by the genomics and bioinformatics formed and matured through the Human Genome Projects from the former concept of inheritance or heredity within the framework of classical and molecular genetics. The purpose of this study was to find out 'how the production structure of genetic information in South Korea has been formed', under the perspective of the conceptual, epistemic, and institutional holisticity or integratedness in the concept and knowledge production structure idealized in Western advanced nations. The discourse of genetic engineering popular in the mid 1980's in South Korea has catalyzed the development of molecular biology. However, the institutional balance that had been established for the biochemistry departments in Natural Science College and Medical College was not formed between the genetic engineering and genetics departments in South Korea. Therefore, they were unable to achieve the more integrative and macro-level disciplinary impact on life sciences, largely due to institutional lack of the capable (human) genetics departments in some leading Korean colleges of Medicine. In genomics, the cutting-edge reprogramming and restructuring of the traditional genetics in the West, South Korea has not invested, even meagerly, in the infrastructure, fund, and research and development (R & D) for the Basic or First Phase of the research trajectory in the Human Genome Project. Without a minimal Basic Phase, the genomics research and development in Korea has been running more or less for the Advanced or Second Phase. Bioinformatics has started developing in Korea under a narrow perspective which regards it as a mere sub-discipline of information technology (IT). Having developed itself in parallel with genomics, bioinformatics contains its own unique logics and contents that can be both directly and indirectly connected to the information science and technology. As a result, bioinformatics reveals a defect in respect of being synergistically integrated into genetics and life sciences in Korea. Owing to the structural problem in the production, genetic information appears to be produced in a fragmented pattern in the Korean society since its fundamental base is weak and thin. A good example of the conceptual and institutional fragmentedness is that 'the genetics of individual identification' is not a normal integrated part of the Korean genetics, but a scientific practice exercised in the departments of legal medicine in a few Medical Colleges. And the environment contributing to the production structure of genetic information in South Korea today comprises 'sangmyung gonghak'(or life engineering) discourse and non-governmental organization movement.

• Journal of Science and Technology Studies
• /
• v.19 no.2
• /
• pp.117-167
• /
• 2019

Since a working draft sequence mapping of the human genome was published in 2001, the variety of the national genome projects has been initiated in South Korea. One of the rationales for such projects is that "the Korean genome database" will be used for "the personalized medicine for Asians." By focusing on the development of human genomics in this country, this paper examines how the discourse has emerged as a strategy for commercializing the national genome. The paper argues that Korean genomicists developed this strategy under the influences of the global "genome sovereignty" policy and local "Asian regionalist" science policy. It will contribute to the literature of the "Asian" race and genomics by shedding new light on the historical formation of the Pan-Asian Single Nucleotide Polymorphism(PASNP) consortium beyond the Singaporean experience.

• Asian Oncology Nursing
• /
• v.12 no.4
• /
• pp.267-273
• /
• 2012

Purpose: The purpose of this review article is to introduce how the Korean Society of Genetic Nursing (KSGN) has evolved and tried to translate genomic knowledge to nursing practice, and then to suggest the future role of genetic nurses in Korea. Methods: A literature review was performed and the current status of genetic counselling in Korea was explored. Then the educational and clinical experiences of the authors were incorporated. Finally, the main activities of Korean nursing for genetics were identified. Results: Two types of genetic counsellor certification have been issued in Korea: one is issued by the Korean Society of Genetic Medicine, another by the Korean Society of Breast Cancer since June 2011. A few Korean nursing researchers have continuously performed research related to genetic nursing and undertook several research projects funded by the government since 2003. In February 2011, KSGN was established and is now trying to establish further international networks. Conclusion: Nursing genetic experts should be trained to integrate all specialties for genetic counselling, so they can provide holistic genetic services including ethical, legal, and social issues (ELSI).

• Proceedings of the Korea Information Processing Society Conference
• /
• 2007.11a
• /
• pp.262-263
• /
• 2007

유전체학 (genomics)의 가장 기초적인 기반이 되는 것은 염기서열을 정확하게 결정해 내는 것이다. 많은 진핵생물들 (eukaryotes)은 두개의 상동염색체를 가지며 두개의 염색체의 염기서열에는 차이가 존재한다. 현재의 유전체 염기서열 결정방법으로는 염기변이가 많이 존재할 경우 유전체의 염기서열을 결정하기 어렵다. 특정한 장소에 서식하는 무수히 많은 미생물들의 유전체의 염기서열을 동시에 결정하는 문제도 미생물학에서 중요성을 인정받는 문제이지만, 미생물들간의 염기변이의 정도는 단일개체의 경우보다 복잡하며 염기서열을 효과적으로 결정하기 힘들다. 따라서 염기변이가 많은 생물들과 미생물들 집합의 염기서열을 결정할 수 있는 방법론의 개발이 시급한 실정이다. 본 논문에서는 조립된 다염기변이 유전체및 메타유전체의 염기서열의 정확성을 평가하기 위한 유전체 서열과 시뮬레이션에 기반한 read 들을 생성하는 도구를 개발하는 것을 목표로 한다.

• Korean Journal of Biological Psychiatry
• /
• v.8 no.2
• /
• pp.196-202
• /
• 2001

The completion of the rough draft of the human genome is a remarkable achievement. It provides the overall structures of huge DNA molecules that constitute the genome and an outline of the information needed to create a human being. This paper reviewed new ideas, projects, and scientific advances made by the Human Genome Project. We also discussed the future of medicine and biomedical research in postgenomic era.

• Proceedings of the Korea Information Processing Society Conference
• /
• 2007.11a
• /
• pp.272-273
• /
• 2007

현대 유전체학 기술의 진보는 생물학적으로 중요한 의미를 갖는 생물들의 유전체 서열의 규명 genome sequencing)에 힘입은 바 크다. 기존의 유전체 서열결정법은 주로 염기변이율이 낮은 생물들에 초점을 맞추어 왔다. 하지만 염기변이율이 높은 생물들의 유전체 염기서열을 결정할 필요가 높아짐에 따라 이를 위한 방법론에 대한 연구가 활발히 진행되고 있다. 염기변이율이 높은 생물들의 이배체 (diploid) 유전체 서열이 효과적으로 결정될 수 있을 경우 기존의 유전체 서열비교의 방법론에도 변화가 요청되고 있는 실정이다. 기존의 유전체 서열비교 (whole-genome alignment) 방법론은 반수체 (haploid) 유전체들의 서열비교을 위해 개발되었지만, 염기변이율이 높은 생물들의 유전체 서열비교에는 반수체 유전체들 비교에 특화된 도구들이 필요하다. 또한 현재 서열비교를 시각화하는 소프트웨어들도 반수체 유전체 비교를 위해 개발된 실정이다. 본 논문의 목표는 이배체 유전체 서열을 비교하는 방법론을 개발을 용이하기위해 이배체 유전체의 서열을 생성하는 도구를 개발하는 것이다. 개발된 도구는 실제 일어날 수 있는 염기변이와 genomic rearrangement를 사용자의 입력을 받아 다수의 생물들의 유전체 서열을 생성해 낸다. 이를 통해 이배체 유전체 서열을 비교하는 도구의 개발을 용이하게 하는데 초첨을 맞추고 있다.