• Title/Summary/Keyword: 유/무기 복합 발수제

Search Result 1, Processing Time 0.019 seconds

Material Properties Evaluation of Cement Mortar Mixed with Organic/Inorganic Combined Water-repellent (유/무기 복합 발수제를 혼입한 모르타르의 재료특성 평가)

  • Kim, Wan-Su;Yoon, Chang-Bok;Cho, In-Sung;Lee, Han-Seung
    • Journal of the Korea institute for structural maintenance and inspection
    • /
    • v.24 no.6
    • /
    • pp.50-58
    • /
    • 2020
  • When the concrete surface layer is damaged, The method of impregnating the concrete surface with a water repellent cannot secure the expected durability. Recently, various waterproofing and water-repellent materials were mixed into concrete or mortar to secure water repellency even inside cracks, but compressive strength was greatly reduced. In order to overcome the decrease in compressive strength, there has not yet been a study using the merits of organic and inorganic materials at the same time, so in this study, the physical properties and water repellency performance were evaluated by mixing an organic/inorganic composite water repellent appropriately mixed with an organic and inorganic material into the mortar. When mixed with organic/inorganic water repellent, the flow and air content were reduced by about 10% and 50% compared to the Liquid specimen. In the case of the P6L1 specimen, it was confirmed that the compressive strength decreased by about 3.5% compared to the non-mixed mortar at 39.5 MPa, the same as the existing water repellent, Powder. Water-repellent performance The organic-inorganic composite water repellent mixture specimen confirmed higher water repellency than the existing water repellent mixture powder, and the chloride penetration resistance evaluation result showed that the organic-inorganic composite water repellent mixture specimen reduced the passing charge by about 45% compared to the non-mixed mortar. In summary, it is judged that the P5L1 organic/inorganic composite water repellent mixed with a powder water repellent and a liquid water repellent in a ratio of 5:1 is the most reasonable to prevent the decrease in compressive strength and secure water repellency.