• Title/Summary/Keyword: 웹탐색행위

Search Result 2, Processing Time 0.015 seconds

A Comparison of web Searching and Library System Searching: Perceived Difficulty, Self-Efficacy, and Effort (웹과 도서관 시스템에서 이용자 정보탐색 비교연구)

  • Rieh, Soo-Young
    • Journal of the Korean Society for information Management
    • /
    • v.24 no.2
    • /
    • pp.29-44
    • /
    • 2007
  • The purpose of this study was to explore whether the concept of amount of invested mental effort (AIME) developed in the field of educational psychology can help explain why people put so little effort into online searching. In this experimental study, two information retrieval systems - a web search engine and a university library system - were used to make a comparison. The data were collected from 15 undergraduate students through background questionnaires, think-aloud protocols, search logs, post-search questionnaires, and post-task interviews. The findings indicate that perception of the web's "easy-ness" and high levels of self confidence in searching capability led the subjects to put less effort into web searching than they do into library system searching. In addition, the perceived difficulty of search task influenced the extent of mental effort invested. The AIME proved a useful framework for understanding search behavior and user experience for both web search engines and library systems.

Judgment Decision, and Choice in Web Searching Behavior - Information Quality and Cognitive Authority - (웹 탐색과정에서 이용자들의 정보의 판단과 선택 -정보의 질 및 권위를 중심으로 -)

  • Rieh, Soo-Young
    • Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science
    • /
    • v.36 no.2
    • /
    • pp.119-138
    • /
    • 2002
  • This study examines the effects of the judgment of information quality and cognitive authority on Web searching behavior. Sixteen scholars from diverse disciplines participated in the experiments, and the data were collected combining search logs, think-aloud during the searches, and post-search interviews in the laboratory setting. The results identified two distinct kinds of judgment, predictive judgment and evaluative judgment. The facets of judgment and criteria used for making Judgments of quality and authority were analyzed associated with the types of task, status of users, and discipline areas of users.