• Title/Summary/Keyword: 우선신호 경고시간

Search Result 3, Processing Time 0.021 seconds

Study of Effectiveness of Signal Preemption Strategy Depending on Train Speed at Intersections Near Highway-Railroad Grade Crossings (철도건널목 인근 신호교차로에서의 우선신호 전략 비교분석(열차속도를 중심으로))

  • Jo, Han-Seon;Kim, Won-Ho;O, Ju-Taek;Sim, Jae-Ik
    • Journal of Korean Society of Transportation
    • /
    • v.25 no.2 s.95
    • /
    • pp.17-26
    • /
    • 2007
  • Because the prime objective of the current preemption methods at signalized intersections near highway-railroad grade crossings(IHRGCs) is to clear the crossing, secondary objectives such as safe pedestrian crossing time and minimized delay often are given less consideration or are ignored completely during the preemption. Under certain circumstances state-of-the-practice traffic signal preemption strategies may cause serious pedestrian safety and efficiency problems at IHRGCs. An improved transition preemption strategy(ITPS) that is specifically designed to improve intersection performance while maintaining or improving the current level of safety was developed by Cho and Rilett. Even if the new transition preemption strategy improved both the safety and efficiency of IHRGCs, the performance of the strategy is affected by train speed. Understanding the impact of this factor is essential in order to implement ITPS. In this paper, the effects of train speed were analyzed using a VISSIM simulation model which was calibrated to field conditions. It was concluded that the delay is affected more by train speed than the transitional preemption strategy and the safety of the intersection is not affected by train speed once an advanced preemption warning time(APWT) is equal to or greater than 90 seconds.

Study of Effectiveness of Signal Preemption Strategy using VISSIM (VISSIM을 이용한 Signal Preemption 전략도입 및 효과분석)

  • Jo, Han-Seon;O, Ju-Taek;Lee, Jae-Myeong;Park, Dong-Ju
    • Journal of Korean Society of Transportation
    • /
    • v.24 no.4 s.90
    • /
    • pp.93-101
    • /
    • 2006
  • The signalized intersections near highway-railroad grade crossing are operated without signal preemption in Korea when trains are approaching the crossing. This signal operation is very dangerous because queues from the intersection can extend back over the track, thereby creating the Potential for a serious vehicle-train accident. And the queues from the crossing can extend to the intersection with the normal signal operation while trains Pass the crossing. In this case the intersection is disrupted, and delay and the Potential for vehicle accident increase highly In order to improve the intersection performance and Protect the accident the crossings and intersections. signal Preemption designed to provide a special control mode should be implemented. In this study it was shown that intersection Performance near highway-railroad grade crossing improved using signal preemption. When signal Preemption is implemented at the test site, the delay was reduced by about 9sec/veh. Even though there were vehicle-train accidents at the crossing in all 30 simulations without signal preemption. there was no vehicle-train accidents at all when signal preemption is used.

A Study on the Introduction of Bus Priority Signal using Deep Learning in BRT Section (BRT 구간 딥 러닝을 활용한 버스우선 신호도입 방안에 관한 연구)

  • Lim, Chang-Sik;Choi, Yang-Won
    • KSCE Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering Research
    • /
    • v.40 no.1
    • /
    • pp.59-67
    • /
    • 2020
  • In this study, a suitable algorithm for each BRT stop type is presented through the network construction and algorithm design effect analysis through the LISA, a traffic signal program, for the BRT stop type in the BRT Design Guidelines, Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs, 2010.6. It was. The phase insert technique is the most effective method for the stop before passing the intersection, the early green technique for the stop after the intersection, and the extend green technique for the mid-block type stop. The extension green technique is used only because it consists of BRT vehicles, general vehicles and pedestrians. Analyzed. After passing through the intersection, the stop was analyzed as 56.4 seconds for the total crossing time and 29.8 seconds for the delay time. In the mid-block type stop, the total travel time of the intersection was 40.5 seconds, the delay time was 9.6 seconds, the average travel time of up and down BRT was 70.2 seconds, the delay time was 14.0 seconds, and the number of passages was 29.