• 한국항해항만학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국항해항만학회 2006년도 춘계학술대회 및 창립 30주년 심포지엄(논문집)
• /
• pp.209-214
• /
• 2006

본 논문에서는 해양오염 사고 시 방제장비를 얼마나 충분히 확보하여 방제작업 수행을 하여야 하는가가 매우 중요하기에 동적 시뮬레이션을 통한 위험분석을 하여 적정 방제장비의 확보를 위한 합리적 구성과 체계화 방안을 수립하는데 도움이 되고자 한다. 한 국가의 방제능력은 단순히 보유하고 있는 유회수기의 대수나 오일펜스의 길이로만 나타내어지는 것은 아니다. 국가의 방제능력은 방제장비의 양뿐만 아니라 오염 사고시 대응의 신속성과 체계성, 효율성을 고려하여 총괄적으로 표현되는 것이다. 이러한 국가방제능력 산정은 매우 복잡하며, 서로간의 상호관계가 매우 중요시되므로 시스템 다이나믹스 이론을 활용한 파워심을 이용하여 표현하였다.

• 한국수산과학회지
• /
• 제36권6호
• /
• pp.743-748
• /
• 2003

An oil boom was set up in order to contain diffused oil from spills and for the retrenchment of damage caused by oil Pollution. Therefore, the oil boom anchor needed proper holding power to endure high resistance from flowing streams and to secure the oil boom around the spill, and must dredge directly into the seabed when it is dropped and block oil outflow immediately. This study investigated the holding power of the danforth anchor and the coastal fishing vessel anchor used for oil booms in the KMPRC (Korea Marine Pollution Response Corporation). For each type, a 30 kg and 20 kg anchor were used. The holding power of the danforth anchors were measured by dropping both weights 10 times. However the coastal fishing vessel anchors were dropped only 5 times each, because no substantial differences were found between drops. In the results of the danforth anchors, an anchor awoke occurred in 2 drops of the 30 kg anchor and in 4 drops of the 20 kg anchor, wherein there was no holding power to be measured. With exception to the anchor awoke cases, the maximum holding power of the danforth 30 kg and 20 kg anchors was 250-520 kg and 123-233 kg, respectively. In the case of the coastal fishing vessel anchors of 30 kg and 20 kg, throughout the experiment, there was no occurrence of an anchor awoke. For the 30 kg and 20 kg anchors, the maximum holding power was measured to be 209-230 kg and 155-170 kg, respectively. Therefore, the holding power of the coastal fishing vessel anchor was shown to be much poorer than that of the danforth anchor. However, the holding power of the danforth anchor was very unstable. Due to the occurrences of anchor awoke, there was no holding power and the measurement value of maximum holding power showed too much variation among the drop tests. Also, after the maximum holding power was achieved, anchor awoke occurred easily. In the case of the coastal fishing vessel anchor was much more stabile, because there was no anchor awoke and no instance where holding power failed. Also the maximum holding power was reached quickly and almost no variation occurred among the drop tests.

• 대한기계학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 대한기계학회 2001년도 춘계학술대회논문집E
• /
• pp.772-776
• /
• 2001

The flow structures of turbulent shear layer behind oil fences with different tip configurations were investigated experimentally using flow visualization and PIV velocity field measurement. An oil fence was installed in a circulating water channel and the flow structure around the fence tip was mainly analyzed in this experiment. The four tip configurations tested in this experiment are knife edge; semi-circle edge, circular edge and rectangular edge. The 300 instantaneous velocity fields were measured using the single-frame PIV system and they were ensemble averaged to give the mean velocity field and spatial distribution of turbulent statistics. Free stream velocity was fixed at 10ms/sec and the corresponding Reynolds number based on the fence height was Re=4000. As a result, for the oil fence with rectangular edge, the streamwise velocity component was decreased. On the other hand it was increased for the oil fence with circular edge. For all four fences tested in this study, general flow pattern of the lower shear layer is analogous but the upper layer shows difference depending on the tip configurations. The oil fence with circular edge has more diffusive upper shear layer than that of the others. The shear layer of the oil fence with rectangular edge has relatively thin thickness. The oil fence with circular edge was found to be proper shape for tandem fence.

• 한국수산과학회지
• /
• 제41권2호
• /
• pp.140-149
• /
• 2008

This study evaluated the efficiency of an oil fence and spreading devices for one vessel in a towing tank. A series of model experiments and numerical calculations were conducted using an existing oil fence for two vessels and a new method for one vessel. Models of the oil fence and spreading devices were constructed on $1/20^{th}$ scale from waterproofed nylon fabric and canvas. The tensions acting on the model of the oil fences and the horizontal distance between the spreading devices were calculated numerically while the oil fences were being towed. The results were extremely close to the results of the model experiments. The ratio of the opening width to the total length of the oil fence, which shows the efficiency of the oil fence for one vessel, was 49.7% in 0.4 m/sec. Therefore, the proposed oil fence system should be very useful for oil containment at sea. As the opening width of the oil fence is not proportional to the length of the towing rope, it may be reasonable to maintain the towing rope at approximately 100 m. Furthermore, a reasonable towing speed, when operating the oil fence for one vessel equipped with spreading devices, was within 0.4 m/sec.

• 한국해양환경ㆍ에너지학회지
• /
• 제6권2호
• /
• pp.3-15
• /
• 2003

해양에 기름이 유출되면 일반적으로 오일펜스를 전장하여 유출유를 포획한 후 유회수기와 유흡착재 등을 사용하여 기름을 회수하는 물리적방법과 유처리제를 살포하여 유화ㆍ분산 처리하는 화학적인 방제방법으로 구분할 수 있다. 그러나 이들 물리ㆍ화학적인 처리방법은 사고초기에는 가장 효과적인 방법이나 기름을 완전히 제거할 수 없으며 유처리제 사용은 2차 오염 우려 가능성을 제기하고 있어 습지, 갯벌, 조간대 지역 등 생물자원이 풍부한 환경민감지역에 대해 새로운 방제기법이 요구되고 있다. 우리나라의 경우 해양오염 방제방법은 물리ㆍ화학적 처리방법에 대한 자세한 적용방범 및 사용지침 등이 해당 법규정에 명시되어 있을 뿐만 아니라 이들 방법개발에 대한 연구가 활발히 진행되어 오고 있다. 또한 실제로 국내 유류오염사고의 방제에 있어서는 대부분 물리적 처리방법과 화학적 처리방법이 병행되어 실시되어 왔다 반면에 생물학적 처리방법이 실제 방제작업에 적용된 경우는 없는데, 이는 생물정화기술에 대한 이해부족 및 기술의 난이성, 기술개발의 부진 등의 원인에 기인한 것일 수도 있으나, 근본적으로 해양생태계에 생물정화기술의 적용 및 사용지침 등에 대한 어떠한 제도적 규정이나 지침 통이 명문화 된 것이 없어 현실적으로 사용에 많은 제약에 따르고 있다. 본 연구에서는 환경친화적인 처리기법인 미생물처리제의 활용 필요성, 국내외 기술개발 현황, 선진외국의 시험방범 및 검정방법 등을 연구하여 우리나라에서 미생물처리제를 사용할 수 있는 활용방안에 대하여 논하고자 한다.